Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An analysis on satisfaction level of clinicians on implant surgical guidance system based on computed tomography

컴퓨터 단층 촬영을 기반으로 한 임플란트 가이드 시스템에 대한 임상가의 만족도 분석

  • Hong, Min-ho (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Jin, Ming-Xu (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Du-Hyeong (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Kyu-Bok (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry and Advanced Dental Device Development Institute, Kyungpook National University)
  • 홍민호 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실, 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소) ;
  • 김명욱 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실, 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소) ;
  • 이두형 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실, 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소) ;
  • 이규복 (경북대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실, 첨단치과의료기기개발연구소)
  • Received : 2015.05.26
  • Accepted : 2015.07.27
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparative assessment on the satisfaction level for the two interfaces of surgical guide system (SimPlant and R2GATE), the design and convenience of manufactured surgical guides and the importance of using the surgical guides thereof by means of survey. Materials and Methods: Hereupon, they simulated the implant surgical process by mounting the two manufactured systems of surgical guide on a dental mold, respectively. The study subjects were instructed to complete the questionnaire as to the satisfaction level upon completion of the simulated surgery. This study summarized the data of each question after collecting the completed questionnaires. Then, this study analyzed the summarized data by utilizing statistical program SPSS 20.0 (IBM). Results: R2GATE had a higher value of the satisfaction level on the design and convenience of manufactures surgical guides. R2GATE group ($7.33{\pm}1.26$) was found to have a higher value in terms of the overall satisfaction level compared to SimPlant group ($6.67{\pm}1.26$) (${\alpha}$ = 0.05). Conclusion: The user satisfaction level on the surgical guide manufactured for R2GATE system was to such an extent as it can be widely used in clinical environment. Moreover, the surgical guide manufactured as R2GATE system can guide both the length and direction of a drill simultaneously. As a result, it is highly recommended for those beginners who do not have a lot of experience in implant placement.

목적: 본 연구에서는 Simplant와 R2GATE 두 가지 수술용 가이드 시스템의 인터페이스(interface)에 대한 만족도, 제작된 수술용 가이드의 디자인과 편의성, 수술용 가이드 활용 시 중요도에 대한 만족도를 설문조사하여 비교평가 하고자 하였다. 연구 재료 및 방법: 두 가지 시스템으로 제작된 수술용 가이드(surgical guide)를 치아모형에 각각 장착한 상태에서 임플란트 수술 과정을 모의하였다. 모의 수술이 끝난 뒤 연구대상에게 만족도에 관한 설문지를 작성하도록 하였다. 작성된 설문지를 회수하여 각 문항에 대한 데이터를 정리하고 통계 프로그램 SPSS 20.0 (IBM)를 이용하여 분석하였다. 결과: 전체적인 만족도는 R2GATE 군($7.33{\pm}1.26$)이 SimPlant 군($6.67{\pm}1.26$)보다 더 높은 것으로 나타났다(${\alpha}$ = 0.05). 결론: R2GATE 시스템으로 제작된 수술용 가이드는 임상에 널리 사용 할 만 한 사용자의 만족도를 나타내었다. 또한, R2GATE 시스템으로 제작된 수술용 가이드는 drill의 길이와 방향을 동시에 guide할 수 있어 임플란트 식립 경험이 부족한 초심자에게 적극 추천된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography). 1. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973;46:1016-22. https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-46-552-1016
  2. Schmuth GP, Freisfeld M, Koster O, Schuller H. The application of computerized tomography (CT) in cases of impacted maxillary canines. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:296-301. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/14.4.296
  3. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, Adam G. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33:83-6. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/28403350
  4. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83:248-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)80018-9
  5. George FM, Chan HL, Razzoog ME, Oh TJ. Fabrication of a cast-based implant surgical guide using guide sleeves. J Prosthet Dent 2011;106:409-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60156-X
  6. Valente F, Schiroli G, Sbrenna A. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2009;24:234-42.
  7. Ruppin J, Popovic A, Strauss M, Spüntrup E, Steiner A, Stoll C. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 2008;19:709-16.
  8. Park JM, Heo SJ, Park EJ. Comparative study on clearance between drilling and bushing of various implant guide systems. Implantology 2014;18:194-202.
  9. Lee DH, Lee KB. The comparative study of user satisfaction on various implant engine system. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci 2014;30:9-15. https://doi.org/10.14368/jdras.2014.30.1.9
  10. Lijphart A. II. The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research. Comparative Political Studies 1975;8:158-77. https://doi.org/10.1177/001041407500800203