DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The user-friendly, ergonomic design aspect of recent intraoral scanners: a literature review

사용자 친화적 인체공학에 따른 구내스캐너 디자인에 대한 고찰

  • Park, Hye-Nan (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Won-Hee (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lim, Young-Jun (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Won-Jin (Department of Oral Maxillofacial Radiology, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Jung-Suk (Department of Prosthodontics and Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Seung-Pyo (Department of Oral Anatomy, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University)
  • 박혜난 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강해부학교실) ;
  • 김원희 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강해부학교실) ;
  • 임영준 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이원진 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강악안면방사선학교실) ;
  • 한중석 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 이승표 (서울대학교 치의학대학원 구강해부학교실)
  • Received : 2015.05.08
  • Accepted : 2015.07.27
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Recently, traditional impression has been rapidly replaced by digital impression using intraoral scanning. There are more than 7 types of intraoral scanners available in the dental market. It is difficult to make effective strategic choices due to a lack of standards and guidelines for optimal intraoral scanning devices. So far, little has been reported about evaluating the ergonomic aspect of these scanners. This literature review compares current intraoral scanning systems based on different types of handles and suggests the most comfortable, user-friendly intraoral scanners from an ergonomic standpoint.

최근 치과 인상 채득법은 인상재를 사용하는 전통적 방법에서 구내스캐닝을 이용한 디지털 인상방법으로 빠르게 발전하고 있다. 현재 치과시장에는 적어도 10개 이상의 구내스캐너가 있다. 하지만 기술과 디자인이 빠르게 발전하는 가운데 다양한 제품들 중 사용자가 합리적인 선택을 할 수 있는 기준이 명확하지 않다. 이 문헌고찰에서는 다양한 인체공학적 디자인 관련 논문을 토대로 한 근거자료를 통하여 사용자의 입장에서 가장 사용이 편리하고 알맞은 인체공학적 디자인을 제안하고자 한다. 이를 통하여 구내스캐너의 인체공학적 디자인의 중요성을 한번 더 확인하고 알맞은 인체공학적 구내스캐너의 제시를 통하여 사용자(치과의사)들의 근골격의 질환과 장애를 예방하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Marmaras N, Poulakakis G, Papakostopoulos V. Ergonomic design in ancient Greece. Appl Ergon 1999;30:361-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(98)00050-7
  2. Gupta A, Bhat M, Mohammed T, Bansal N, Gupta G. Ergonomics in Dentistry. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7:30-4.
  3. Gopinadh A, Devi KN, Chiramana S, Manne P, Sampath A, Babu MS. Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal disorder: as an occupational hazard in dentistry. J Contemp Dent Pract 2013;14:299-303.
  4. 3Shape. Available from: http://www.3shapedental.com/restoration/dental-clinic/trios-scanner/triosscanner/(updated 2014 Nov 24).
  5. iTero. Available from: http://www.itero.com/whyitero (updated 2014 Nov 24).
  6. 3D Progress. Available from: http://www.3dprogress.it/product/3d-progress/ (updated 2014 Nov 24).
  7. Orchestrate Orthodontic Technologies. Available from: http://orchestrate3d.com/index.php/iosfastscan-3d-scanner/ (updated 2014 Nov 24).
  8. Stephen Lim D.D.S. & Associates. Available from: http://www.stephenlimdds.com/general-dentistrynew-york-ny/technology-e4d-new-york.html (updated 2014 Nov 24).
  9. Schrijf je nu in. Available from: http://www.thcc.nl/site/pages/behandelingen/kronen-en-bruggen/digitale-scanner.php (updated 2014 Nov 24).
  10. Summit Dental Group. Available from: http://boise-dentists.com/service/introducing-cerec-digitalimpression-technology-at-summit-dental/ (updated 2014 Nov 24).
  11. $TRIOS^{(R)}$ 3Shape $TRIOS^{(R)}$ Product Catalog. Copenhagen, 3Shape; 2014. p. 18.
  12. Pawley JB. Handbook of biological confocal microscopy. 3rd ed. New York; Springer; 2006.
  13. Brooks R. Ergonomics Make Welders More Productive. Weld Design Fabr 2013.
  14. iTero. iTero HD2.9 Operation Manual. Yehuda;CADENT LTD; 2012. p. 24.
  15. 3D Progress. Available from: http://www.vatechkorea.com/cadcam/01_01.asp(updated 2014 Nov 24).
  16. IOS Fastscan. Available from: http://orchestrate3d.com/index.php/ios-fastscan-3d-scanner/(updated 2014 Nov 24).
  17. Ali P, Behrai T. A reliable 3D laser triangulationbased scanner with a new simple but accurate procedure for finding scanner parameters. Am J Sci 2014;6:80-5.
  18. El-Hakim SF, Beraldin JA, Blais F. Comparative evaluation of the performance of passive and active 3D vision systems. Proc. SPIE 2646 1995 doi:10.1117/12.227862.
  19. Patkin M. A check-List for handle design. Ergonomics Australia On-Line. 1997.
  20. Patkin M. Ergonomic aspects of surgical dexterity. Med J Aust 1967;2:775-7.
  21. Jonathan W, Choi YH. Ergonomic handle for grooming brush. US Patent 2003/6213055 B1.
  22. Majid M, Alireza C, Mohammad AM, Shirazeh A. Ergonomic design of carpet weaving hand tools. Ini J Ind Ergonom 2007;37:581-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2007.03.005
  23. $Lava^{TM}$C.O.S. $Lava^{TM}$ chairside oralscanner C.O.S. technical data sheet. St. Paul, MN; 3M ESPE; 2009. p. 8.
  24. E4D Dentist. E4D dentist the difference in dentistry. Richardson, TX; D4D Technologies. Lls; 2011. p.4.
  25. Patkin M. Ergonomics and the operating microscope. Adv Ophthalmol 1978;37:53-63.
  26. Heber S. 3D image reconstruction using active wavefront sampling. Available from: https://rvlab.icg.tugraz.at/project_page/project_wavefront/project_wavefront.htm (updated 2014 Nov 25).
  27. Derek T. Dental Handpiece. US Patent 2010/7677890B2.
  28. Colin R, Robert R. Ergonomic Device. US Patent 2007/0196158 A1.
  29. Drury CG. Handles for manual materials handling. Appl Ergon 1980;11:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-6870(80)90120-9
  30. Robert Bosch GmbH. Produktwissen-Reload. Available from: http://www.baumarktwissen.eu/Medien/mdb/data/de/24063/24069/23679/ergonomie.html (updated 2014 Nov 25).
  31. McCormick EJ. Human factors in engineering and design. 5th ed. New York; McGraw Hill; 1982.