Journal of Dental Rehabilitation and Applied Science (구강회복응용과학지)

Korean Academy of Stomatognathic Function and Occlusion (대한턱관절교합학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implant overdenture treatment using several solitary attachment systems on mandibular edentulous patients

하악 무치악 환자에서 수종의 어태치먼트를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 수복 증례

  • Park, Mid-Eum (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University) ;
  • Shin, Soo-Yeon (Department of Prosthodontics, College of Dentistry, Dankook University)
  • 박믿음 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실) ;
  • 신수연 (단국대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실)
  • Received : 2015.06.12
  • Accepted : 2015.06.28
  • Published : 2015.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Implant overdenture treatment using several solitary attachment systems on mandibular edentulous patients. Most patients with severe residual ridge resorption report significantly more problems adapting to their mandibular denture due to a lack of comfort, retention, stability and to the inability to chew and eat. Recent scientific studies carried out over the past decade have determined that the benefits of a mandibular implant overdenture are sufficient to get retention and stability. Therefore, overdenture with implants on the mandible and attachments are considered as a treatment of choice as a favorable treatment. In this cases, with consideration for jaw relation, level of bone loss, facial support and economic factor, edentulous patients with severe residual ridge resorption are rehabilitated by complete denture on maxilla and two-implants overdenture using several solitary attachment systems on mandible.

무치악 환자에서는 치아가 상실되면서 주위 치조골의 개조와 흡수가 일어나고, 이에 따라 총의치의 유지력 감소, 저작 효율의 저하와 통증으로 인해 의치 사용에 어려움을 겪게 된다. 이를 개선하기 위해 하악에 2 - 4개의 임플란트를 식립하고 어태치먼트에서 유지 또는 지지를 얻는 피개의치가 바람직한 치료 방법으로 고려되고 있다. 본 증례들은 하악 완전 무치악 환자들을 악간 관계, 골흡수 정도, 안모지지 등을 평가하여 하악에 2개의 임플란트 식립을 고려하고, 다양한 종류의 어태치먼트를 이용한 임플란트 피개의치 수복을 계획하여 치료하였다. 주기적인 경과 관찰 결과 심미적, 기능적으로 만족할만한 결과를 얻었기에 이를 보고하는 바이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, Head T, Lund JP, MacEntee M, Mericske-Stern R, Mojon P, Morais J, Naert I, Payne AG, Penrod J, Stoker GT Jr, Tawse-Smith A, Taylor TD, Thomason JM, Thomson WM, Wismeijer D. The McGilll consensus statement on overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:413-4.
  2. Rissin L, House JE, Manly RS, Kapur KK. Clinical comparison of masticatory performance and electromyographic activity of patients with complete dentures, overdentures and natural teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:508-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(78)80181-4
  3. Kapur KK, Soman SD. Masticatory performance and efficiency in denture wearers. J Prosthet Dent 1964;4:687-94.
  4. van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Callberson L, Demanet M. A prospective evaluation of the fate of 697 consecutive intraoral fixtures ad modum Branemark in the rehabilitation of edentulism. J Head Neck Pathol 1987;6:53-8.
  5. Narhi TO, Geertman ME, Hevinga M, Abdo H, Kalk W. Changes in the edentulous maxilla in persons wearing implant-retained mandibular overdentures. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:43-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2000.107113
  6. Kapur KK, Garrett NR, Hamada MO, Roumanas ED, Freymiller E, Han T, Diener RM, Levin S, Wong WK. Randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant supported overdentures and conventional dentures in diabetic patients. Part III: comparisons of patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:416-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70028-4
  7. Geertman ME, Van Waas MA, van’t Hof MA, Kalk W. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a ramdomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1996;11:194-200.
  8. Gotfredsen K, Holm B. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or bar attachments: a randomized prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:125-30.
  9. Bakke M, Holm B, Gotfredsen K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. Int J Prosthdont 2002;15:575-81.
  10. Thiel CP, Evans DB, Burnett RR. Combination syndrome associated with a mandibular implantsupported overdenture: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:107-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90084-0
  11. Maxson BB, Powers MP, Scott RF. Prosthodontic considerations for the transmandibular implant. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:554-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90075-N
  12. Barber HD, Scott RF, Maxon BB, Fonseca RJ. Evaluation of anterior maxillary alveolar ridge resorption when opposed by the transmandibular implant. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1990;48:1283-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(90)90483-I
  13. Schneider AL, Kurtzman GM. Bar overdentures utilizing the Locator attachment. Gen Dent 2001;49: 210-4.
  14. Heckmann SM, Winter W, Meyer M, Weber HP, Wichmann MG. Overdenture attachment selection and the loading of implant and denture-bearing area. Part 2: a methodical study using five types of attachment. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001;12:640-7. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120613.x
  15. Sadowsky SJ. Mandibular implant-retained overdentures: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2001;86:468-73. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.119921
  16. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemi T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302.
  17. Nissan J, Oz-Ari B, Gross O, Ghelfan O, Chaushu G. Long-term prosthetic aftercare of direct vs. indirect attachment incorporation techniques to mandibular implant-supported overdenture. Clin Oral Implants Res 2011;22:627-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2010.02026.x
  18. Bilhan H, Geckili O, Mumcu E, Bilmenoglu C. Maintenance requirement associated with mandibular implant overdentures: clinical results after first year of service. J Oral Implantol 2011;37:697-704. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-10-00096