DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Prosthetic rehabilitation for a patient with CO-MI discrepancy

비생리적인 최대교두감합위의 교합재구성을 통한 수정

  • Choo, Seung-Sik (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Heo, Yoon-Hyuk (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Cho, Lee-Ra (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Park, Chan-Jin (Department of Prosthodontics and Research Institute of Oral Science College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 추승식 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 허윤혁 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 조리라 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소) ;
  • 박찬진 (강릉원주대학교 치과대학 치과보철학교실 및 구강과학연구소)
  • Received : 2015.06.29
  • Accepted : 2015.07.14
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Centric occlusion-maximum intercuspation (CO-MI) discrepancy is one of main causes of evoking premature contact and resultant mandibular shift. These non-physiological conditions can induce temporomandibular disease, periodontitis, and non-carious cervical lesion. Therefore, if CO-MI discrepancy exists in patients who need extensive prosthetic rehabilitation, it must be corrected and then physiological occlusion must be restored. This report describes the treatment procedure of removing CO-MI discrepancy and prosthetic rehabilitation in a patient with 3.5 mm discrepancy, multiple caries and periodontitis. Proper mandibular position and modified opening & closing movement were confirmed by ARCUSdigma II and transcranial radiograph.

중심위에서 벗어나 있는 최대교두감합위는 상하악 치아의 조기접촉 및 사면활주의 직접적인 원인이며, 악관절 내장증, 치아마모, 치주질환 등을 일으킬 수 있다. 그러므로 광범위한 보철수복이 필요한 환자에서 중심위와 최대교두감합위의 불일치가 존재하는 경우 반드시 이를 제거하여 생리적인 교합양식을 회복해야 한다. 본 증례의 환자는 초진 시 약 3.5 mm의 사면활주와 다수의 우식 및 중등도의 치주질환을 앓고 있었다. 보철수복을 통해 기능 및 심미성을 회복하는 동시에 중심위와 최대교두감합위를 일치시켜 사면활주를 제거하였으며, ARCUSdigma II와 경두개 방사선 사진을 이용하여 생리적인 위치로 수정된 하악위와 변화된 개폐구 경로를 관찰하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:10-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013
  2. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Gornbein JA. A multiple logistic regression analysis of the risk and relative odds of temporomandibular disorders as a function of common occlusal features. J Dent Res 1993;72:968-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345930720061301
  3. Landi N, Manfredini D, Tognini F, Romagnoli M, Bosco M. Quantification of the relative risk of multiple occlusal variables for muscle disorders of the stomatognathic system. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:190-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.05.013
  4. Branschofsky M, Beikler T, Schäfer R, Flemming TF, Lang H. Secondary trauma from occlusion and periodontitis. Quintessence Int 2011;42:515-22.
  5. Harrel SK, Nunn ME. The association of occlusal contacts with the presence of increased periodontal probing depth. J Clin Periodontol 2009;36:1035-42 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2009.01486.x
  6. Brandini DA, Trevisan CL, Panzarini SR, Pedrini D. Clinical evaluation of the association between noncarious cervical lesions and occlusal forces. J Prosthet Dent 2012;108:298-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(12)60180-2
  7. Troeltzsch M, Troeltzsch M, Cronin RJ, Brodine AH, Frankenberger R, Messlinger K. Prevalence and association of headaches, temporomandibular joint disorders, and occlusal interferences. J Prosthet Dent 2011;105:410-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(11)60084-X
  8. Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: from TMJ to smile design. St. Louis; CV Mosby; 2007. p. 4-9.
  9. Ehrlich J, Hochman N, Yaffe A. The masticatory pattern as an adjunct for diagnosis and treatment. J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:393-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1992.tb01581.x
  10. Yoshida E, Fueki K, Igarashi Y. Association between food mixing ability and mandibular movements during chewing of a wax cube. J Oral Rehabil 2007;34:791-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2007.01743.x
  11. Park JM, Kim HJ, Park EJ, Kim MR, Kim SJ. Three dimensional finite element analysis of the stress distribution around the mandibular posterior implant during non-working movement according to the amount of cantilever. J Adv Prosthodont 2014;6:361-71. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2014.6.5.361
  12. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Brägger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, Salvi GE. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:441-51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01706.x
  13. Zurdo J, Romao C, Wennstrom JL. Survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed partial dentures with cantilevers: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20 Suppl 4:59-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01773.x
  14. Salama MA, Salama H, Garber DA. Guidelines for aesthetic restorative options and implant site enhancement: the utilization of orthodontic extrusion. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2002;14:125-130.
  15. Hellsing G. Occlusal adjustment and occlusal stability. J Prosthet Dent 1988;59:696-702. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(88)90385-X
  16. Kirveskari P. Assessment of occlusal stability by measuring contact time and centric slide. J Oral Rehabil 1999;26:763-6. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00483.x