DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Appraising the Worth of Ecosystem Services of Rice-fields in Chungcheongnam-do Region

충청남도 논습지의 생태계서비스 가치 평가

  • 사공정희 (충남발전연구원 환경생태연구부) ;
  • 정옥식 (충남발전연구원 환경생태연구부) ;
  • 여형범 (충남발전연구원 환경생태연구부)
  • Received : 2015.02.06
  • Accepted : 2015.07.03
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

The value of rice-fields is being graded down in Korea because it has been estimated only from the size. The purpose of this study is to suggest a management plan in which the location and the size of valuable rice-fields for conservation are based on the results of appraising the worth of ecosystem services of rice-fields in Chungcheongnam-do region. The study is as follows; (1)selecting the indicators for evaluating the ecosystem services of rice-fields considering both general functions and special functions in the regional environment conditions, (2)classifying the grades of rice-fields in ecosystem service values, (3)suggesting the location and the size of valuable rice-fields for conservation, (4)calculating the total economic value of the ecosystem services of rice-fields. The results of this study are that the valuable rice-fields' locations for conservation are the grade I rice-fields and their total area is 100,000ha. Also, the value of the ecosystem services of rice-fields in Chungcheongnam-do region was equivalent to 32.8 trillion won. This amount is over 18 trillion won more than the amount obtained if the total rice-fields in Chungcheongnam-do region were to be transformed to other land-use types. The value of ecosystem services should be considered in the future when appraising the worth of rice-fields, and methods of estimating the ecosystem services of rice-fields need to be developed with a more objective and suitable index.

Keywords

References

  1. Daeseok Kang, 2013, Emergy-Based Value of the Contributions of the Youngsan River Estuary Ecosystem to the Korean Economy, The Sea Journal of the Korean Society of Oceanography, 18(1) : 12-20.
  2. Sinkyu Kang. John Tenhunen(2010) Complex Terrain and Ecological Heterogeneity (TERRECO):Evaluating Ecosystem Services in Production Versus water Quantity/quality in Mountainous Landscapes, Korean Journal of Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 12(4) : 307-316. https://doi.org/10.5532/KJAFM.2010.12.4.307
  3. Hyejung Kang, 2007, OECD, Discussion Trend About Multifunctionality of Agriculture, KREI World Agricultural Information, 1-24.
  4. Relevant Ministry joint, 2014, The 3rd National biodiversity strategy(NBSAP).
  5. Gongju-si, 2010, Construction of Gongju Biotope Map.
  6. Gyeryong-si, 2010, Construction of Gyeryong Biotope Map.
  7. Geumsan-gun, 2013, Construction of Geumsan Biotope Map.
  8. Meehyun Koo. Dongkun Lee. Taeyong Jung, 2012, A Study on the Contexts of Ecosystem Services in the Policymaking Process, The Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology, 15(5) : 85-102.
  9. K-water, 2013, 2013 Groundwater annual report.
  10. Yongryeol Kim. Hakgyun Jung. Jahyeo Min, 2013, Assesment of Willing to Pay for Nonmarket Agriculture. Rural Resources, Korea Rural Economic Institute.
  11. Korea Forest Research Institute, 2010, Quantification of the Valuation of Public-Good Functions of the Forest.
  12. Sooseok Kim. Seik Oh, 2003, Estimation of the Economic Value of the Multifunctionality of Agriculture, Journal of Rural Development, 26(2).
  13. Nonsan-si, 2010, Construction of Nonsan Biotope Map.
  14. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, 2013, Construction of smart farm map
  15. National Academy of Agriculture Science, 2008, Valuation of Agricultural Multifunctionality.
  16. Dangjin-si, 2009, Construction of Dangjin Biotope Map.
  17. Daeho Ryu. Dongkun Lee, 2013, Evaluation on Economic Value of the Greenbelt's Ecosystem Services in the Seoul Metropolitan Region, Journal of Korea Planners Association, 48(3) : 279-292.
  18. Buyeo-gun, 2010, Construction of Buyeo Biotope Map.
  19. Boryeong-si, 2011, Construction of Boryeong Biotope Map.
  20. Seosan-si, 2010, Construction of Seosan Biotope Map.
  21. Seocheon-gun, 2011, Construction of Seocheon Biotope Map.
  22. Asan-si, 2014, Construction of Asan Biotope Map.
  23. Hyejung Oh. Doojin Lee, 2010, A Study of efficient rain water management in Chungnam region, Chungnam Development Institute.
  24. Seunghoon Yoo, 2007, Measurement of the Environmental Value of the Seomjin-River Estuary, Korea Environment Institute, Environmental policy, 6(2) : 1-25.
  25. Seunghoon Yoo. Joosuk Lee, 2008, Assessment of Environmental Value of Garorim Gulf, Journal of Economy studies, 56(3) : 5-28.
  26. Seunghoon Yoo. Joosuk Lee, 2011, Assessment of Economic Value of Yongsan River Estuary, Journal of Korea Water Resources Association, 44(8) : 629-637. https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2011.44.8.629
  27. Gunhyeong Yuk. Mingoo Kang. Whoanmo Kang. Insoo Go. Soyoun Bae. Mingyu Lee. Goanghoon Choi. Jinook Heo. Dowon Lee, 2010, Ecosystem Service and Biodiversity and Threat Factor, Journal of environmental studies, 49 : 1-25.
  28. Enggyung Lee. Sooyoun Lee. Changro Lee. Heesun Jo. Kyunga Kim. Soojin Park, 2013, Comparison of Regional Ecosystem Services Values and Land value, The Korean Geographical Society conference collected papers, 172-175.
  29. Jaehwoan Im, 2002, Consideration of the Socio-economic effect on the Public-Good Functions of rice-fields, Korea Rural Community Corporation.
  30. Yesan-gun, 2010, Construction of Yesan Biotope Map.
  31. Dajung Jung. Kyungho Kang. Joon Heo. Minsoo Sohn. Hongsuk Kim, 2011, Valuation of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Using National Forest Inventory Data, Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment, 20(5) : 615-625.
  32. OkSik Jung. Hyoungbeom Yeo. NamHyuk Hur. Hyejeong Oh. JungHee Sagong, 2013, A study on biodiversity conservation and sustainable agriculture, CDI report 2013-11.
  33. HakKyun Jeong. ChangGil Kim. Jongin Kim, 2014, Reorganizing direct payment program for environment-friendly agriculture, KREI report.
  34. HakKyun Jeong. ChangGil Kim. JaeHwan Han. Jongin Kim, 2014, A study on the economic valuation of environmental functions of environmentalfriendly farming, Proceedings of KAEA & KAAFP 2014 summer co-conference.
  35. Cheongyang-gun, 2011, Construction of Cheongyang Biotope Map.
  36. Chunam-do, 2013, A study on the measures of reorganizing agricultural direct payment program.
  37. Chungnam-do, 2014, A study on the effective measures for financial resources of reorganizing agricultural direct payment program.
  38. Taean-gun, 2011, Construction of Taean Biotope Map.
  39. Statistics Korea, 2011, 2010 Agriculture, forestry and fishery census.
  40. Hongseong-gun, 2010, Construction of Hongseong Biotope Map.
  41. Ministry of Environemnt, 2004, The National census of wintering waterbirds.
  42. Ministry of Environemnt, 2010, Study on Ecological Site Development of Saemangeum
  43. Ministry of Environemnt, 2011, Study on policy for rice peddy wetland.
  44. Ministry of Environemnt, 2014, About the operation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme, Environmental Policy Briefs.
  45. Ministry of Environemnt, 2007, Technology for utilization and control of ecosystem - Development and Practical Application of Socioeconomic Valuation Methods for Biodiversity in Korea. .
  46. Jeongim Hwang. Eunja Kim. Sangyoung Rhee. Seongwoo Lee, 2009, Valuting Sociocultural Multifunctionality of Rural Areas in Korea, 16(3) : 643-669.
  47. IEEP, 2014, Policy Options For an EU No Net Loss Initiative.
  48. TEEB-The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity, 2011, TEEB Manual for Cities: Ecosystem Services in Urban Management.
  49. Smyth, Paul B., 2014, Application of an Ecosystems Services Framework for BLM Land Use Planning: Consistency with the Federal Land Policy and Management Act and Other Applicable Law, Federal Resource Management and Ecoystem Services Guidebook.
  50. 桐谷圭治編, 2010, 田んぼの生きもの全種リスト, 農と自然の研究所.
  51. (株)三菱総合研究所, 2001, 地球環境. 人間生活にかかわる農業及び森林の多面的な機能の評価に関する調査研究報告書.
  52. https://www.kais.kr/realtyprice
  53. http://www.nheri.re.kr
  54. http://www.kostat.go.kr
  55. http://aglook.krei.re.kr/jsp/pc/front/trend/wholesaleTrend.jsp
  56. http://www.krei.re.kr
  57. http://www.ytn.co.kr/_ln/0101_201409101428505969

Cited by

  1. Analysis of the Correlation Between Ecological Status and Location Environment by Cultivated Land Restoration Type of Geumgang Riverine Ecobelt vol.24, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.11628/ksppe.2021.24.4.389