DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Shear Performance of Glass Fiber Reinforced Glulam Bolted Connection

  • Kim, Keon-ho (Division of Wood Engineering, Department of Forest Products, Korea Forest Research Institute) ;
  • Hong, Soon-il (Program of Forest Biomaterials Engineering, Division of Forest Material Science & Engineering,, College of Forest and Environmental Sciences, Kangwon national university)
  • Received : 2014.10.14
  • Accepted : 2015.06.25
  • Published : 2015.09.25

Abstract

To evaluate the shear performance of the textile glass fiber and the sheet glass fiber reinforced glulam bolted connections, a tension type shear test was conducted. The average yield shear strength of the bolted connection of reinforced glulam was increased by 12% ~ 31% compared to the non-reinforced glulam. It was confirmed that the shear performance of 5D end distance of the glass fiber reinforced glulam connection corresponds to that of 7D of the non-reinforced glulam connection proposed in building design requirements in various countries. Compared to the non-reinforced glulam, the average shear strength of textile glass fiber reinforced glulam was markedly increased. The non-reinforced glulam and the GFRP reinforced glulam underwent a momentary splitting fracture. However, the failure mode of textile glass fiber reinforced glulam showed a good ductility.

Keywords

References

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea. 2005. Korean Government Guidelines of Korean Buildings Code-Structural. KGG-KBCS-08.
  2. Hernandez, R., Davalos, J.F., Sonti, S.S., Kim, Y., Moody, R.C. 1997. Strength and stiffness of reinforced Yellow-Poplar glued-laminated beams. Res Pap FPL-RP-554. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison.
  3. Kim, H.K., Park, C.Y., Lee, J.J. 2008. Evaluation of the strength properties of glulam connections with inserted steel plates and drift pins. Journal of the Korean Wood Science and Technology 36(2): 29-38.
  4. Lantos, G. 1970. The flexural behavior of steel reinforced laminated timber beams. Wood Science 2(3): 136-142.
  5. Mark, R. 1961. Wood-aluminum beams within and beyond the elastic range. I. Rectangular Sections. Forest Products Journal 11(10): 477-484.
  6. Masahiro, N., Hiroyasu, S., Akira, W., Kenji, M. 2009. A strength calculation method of single bolted timber joint loaded parallel to the grain. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, AIJ 74(638): 681-690. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.74.681
  7. Mastschuch, R. 2000. Reinforced Multiple Bolt Timber Connections. M.Sc. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  8. Ogawa, H. 2000. Architectural application of carbon fibers: Development of new carbon fiber reinforced glulam. Carbon 38: 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(99)00146-3
  9. Pedersen, M.B.U. 2002. Dowel Type Timber Connections-Strength Modelling. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rapport BYG.DTU R-039, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark.
  10. Soltis, L.A., Hubbard, F.K., Wilkinson, T.L. 1986. Bearing strength of bolted timber joints. Journal of Structural Engineering 112(9): 2141-2154. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:9(2141)
  11. Wilkinson, T.L. 1986. Load distribution among bolts parallel to load. Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE 112(4): 835-852. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:4(835)

Cited by

  1. Estimate of Bolt Connection Strength of Reinforced Glulam using Glass Fiber vol.44, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2016.44.1.67
  2. Fracture Toughness of Glass Fiber Reinforced Laminated Timbers vol.43, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.5658/WOOD.2015.43.6.861