DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Abrasion Characteristics of Seaside Armor Stones of Seadike -Focused on Saemangeum Seadike-

방조제 해측피복석의 마모특성분석 -새만금방조제를 중심으로-

  • Goh, Nam Young (Department of Regional Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Kim, Hak Won (Technical Review & Quality Management Institute, KRC) ;
  • Choi, Jin Kyu (Department of Regional Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Jang, Tae Il (Department of Regional Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University) ;
  • Son, Jae Gwon (Department of Regional Construction Engineering, Chonbuk National University)
  • Received : 2015.07.03
  • Accepted : 2015.08.19
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

The results of Saemangeum seadike field inspection and material testing of armor stones in order to analyze causes of abrasion according to material characteristics of seaside armor stones in Saemangeum seadike are in the following: 1. The armor stones in Saemangeum seadike have been constructed by using internal stones (mainly, sinsi stones) and external stones, which had less strength (77.3 %) and more abrasion rate (133.3 %) compared with sinsi stones. 2. The compressive strength and abrasion rate were compared between ordinary wave section and high wave section for the purpose of analyzing the influence of waves. In compressive strength, sinsi stones were 4.0 % stronger and external stones were 0.6 % stronger in ordinary wave section than those of high wave section in average. In the case of abrasion rate, sinsi stones were 3.0 % higher and external stones were 8.2 % higher in the high wave section than those in the ordinary section. 3. The result of comparing compressive strength according to a zone is that the compressive strength in the Intertidal area was less strong in most of the zones. 4. Considering that deviated stones are moving around over the surface of armor stones in situ, it is important to compare material characteristics. So the comparison test about this factor showed that deviated sinsi stones were stronger than armor stones in situ in terms of compressive strength and resistance to abrasion. Based on these results, abraded armor stones may have resulted from their durability. Therefore it is assumed that armor stones are likely to be abraded when deviated stones which are more durable are moving around over armor stones which are less durable.

Keywords

References

  1. Baek, S. C. and Lee, S. Y., 2011, Study on movement features of seaside armor stones according to wave in saemangum sea dike, Korean geo-environmental society, 12-7 (in korean).
  2. Deniz, B., and Topal, T., 2009, Testing of armourstone for the purpose of durability: A Case Study from Two Rubble Mound Breakwaters(Mersin TURKEY). Journal of Coastal Research, Special Issue 56, 501-504.
  3. Korea rural community corporation(KRC), 2002, Seamankeum tideland reclamation project, 158-159 (in korean).
  4. Kong B. S., 2003, The study on the strengthening method of seadike armor-layer, Master's thesis., Konkuk University, 32-35 (in korean).
  5. Korea rural community corporation(KRC), 2008, Study on effective methods for maintenance of saemangum facilities, 3-5 (in korean).
  6. Korea rural community corporation(KRC), 2009, Report of Tideland reclamation, 3-10 (in korean).
  7. Korea rural community corporation(KRC), 2011, Study on devices against abrasion of seaside armor stones in saemangum sea dike, 3-6, 99-100 (in korean).
  8. Lienhart, D.A., 1998, Rock engineering rating system for assessing the suitability of armourstone sourcees, Advances in Aggregates and armourstone Evaluation, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 13, 91-106. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.ENG.1998.013.01.08
  9. Latham, J.P., 1993, A mill Abrasion test for wear resistance of armour stone, Rock for Erosion Control, ASTM STP 1177.
  10. Latham, J.P., Lienhart, D.A., and Dupray, S., 2006, Rock quality, durability and service life prediction of armourstone, Engineering Geology 87, 122-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2006.06.004
  11. Latham, J.P., and Poole, A.B., 1988, Abrasion Testing and Armourstone Degradation, Coastal Engineering, 12, 233-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3839(88)90007-5
  12. Poole, A, B, 1991, Rock quality in coastal engineering. Journal of Engineering Geology, 24, 85-90. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.QJEG.1991.024.01.09
  13. Son, J. G., Goh, N. Y., Choi, J. K., Kim, H. W., 2013, Analysis on the Cause of Abrasion according to Deformation Types of Seaside Armor Stones in Saemangeum Seadike, Journal of the Korea Society of Agricultural Engineers, 55(6):187-196 (in korean). https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2013.55.6.187
  14. Tomasicchio, G.R., Lamberti, A., and Archetti, R., 2003, Armourstone abrasion due to displacements in sea storms, Journal of Waterway, Port, Coastal and Ocean Engineering, ASCE 129. 5, 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-950X(2003)129:5(229)

Cited by

  1. Stability Evaluation of Armor Stones in the Seadike of Incoming High Waves - Focused on Saemangeum Seadike - vol.58, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5389/KSAE.2016.58.4.047