DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficacy of Chaetomium Species as Biological Control Agents against Phytophthora nicotianae Root Rot in Citrus

  • Phung, Manh Hung (Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL)) ;
  • Wattanachai, Pongnak (Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL)) ;
  • Kasem, Soytong (Faculty of Agricultural Technology, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL)) ;
  • Poeaim, Supattra (Faculty of Science, King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (KMITL))
  • Received : 2015.06.07
  • Accepted : 2015.07.21
  • Published : 2015.09.30

Abstract

Thailand is one of the largest citrus producers in Southeast Asia. Pathogenic infection by Phytophthora, however, has become one of major impediments to production. This study identified a pathogenic oomycete isolated from rotted roots of pomelo (Citrus maxima) in Thailand as Phytophthora nicotianae by the internal transcribed spacer ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Then, we examined the in vitro and in vivo effects of Chaetomium globosum, Chaetomium lucknowense, Chaetomium cupreum and their crude extracts as biological control agents in controlling this P. nicotianae strain. Represent as antagonists in biculture test, the tested Chaetomium species inhibited mycelial growth by 50~56% and parasitized the hyphae, resulting in degradation of P. nicotianae mycelia after 30 days. The crude extracts of these Chaetomium species exhibited antifungal activities against mycelial growth of P. nicotianae, with effective doses of $2.6{\sim}101.4{\mu}g/mL$. Under greenhouse conditions, application of spores and methanol extracts of these Chaetomium species to pomelo seedlings inoculated with P. nicotianae reduced root rot by 66~71% and increased plant weight by 72~85% compared to that in the control. The method of application of antagonistic spores to control the disease was simple and economical, and it may thus be applicable for large-scale, highly effective biological control of this pathogen.

Keywords

References

  1. Erwin DC, Ribeiro OK. Phytophthora diseases worldwide. St. Paul (MN): APS Press; 1996.
  2. Timmer LW, Graham JH, Zitko SE. Metalaxyl-resistant isolates of Phytophthora nicotianae: occurrence, sensitivity, and competitive parasitic ability on citrus. Plant Dis 1998;82:254-61. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.2.254
  3. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Statistics Division. 2. Rome: Economic and Social Development Department; 2015 [cited 2015 Feb 15]. Available from: http://faostat3.fao.org/browse/Q/QC/E.
  4. Drenth A, Sendall B. Economic impact of Phytophthora diseases in Southeast Asia. In: Drenth A, Guest DI, editors. Diversity and management of Phytophthora in Southeast Asia. ACIAR Monograph No. 114. Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agriculture; 2004. p. 10-28.
  5. Latijnhouwers M, De Wit PJ, Govers F. Oomycetes and fungi: similar weaponry to attack plants. Trends Microbiol 2003;11:462-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2003.08.002
  6. Zhang Q, Li HQ, Zong SC, Gao JM, Zhang AL. Chemical and bioactive diversities of the genus Chaetomium secondary metabolites. Mini Rev Med Chem 2012;12:127-48. https://doi.org/10.2174/138955712798995066
  7. Sun H, Yang J, Lin C, Huang X, Xing R, Zhang KQ. Purification and properties of a beta-1,3-glucanase from Chaetomium sp. that is involved in mycoparasitism. Biotechnol Lett 2006;28:131-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-005-5132-0
  8. Soytong K, Kanokmedhakul S, Kukongviriyapa V, Isobe M. Application of Chaetomium species (Ketomium(R)) as a new broad spectrum biological fungicide for plant disease control: a review article. Fungal Divers 2001;7:1-15.
  9. Hung PM, Wattanachai P, Kasem S, Poaim S. Biological control of Phytophthora palmivora causing root rot of pomelo using Chaetomium spp. Mycobiology 2015;43:63-70. https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2015.43.1.63
  10. Cooke DE, Drenth A, Duncan JM, Wagels G, Brasier CM. A molecular phylogeny of Phytophthora and related oomycetes. Fungal Genet Biol 2000;30:17-32. https://doi.org/10.1006/fgbi.2000.1202
  11. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011;28:2731-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
  12. Kanokmedhakul S, Kanokmedhakul K, Nasomjai P, Louangsysouphanh S, Soytong K, Isobe M, Kongsaeree P, Prabpai S, Suksamrarn A. Antifungal azaphilones from the fungus Chaetomium cupreum CC3003. J Nat Prod 2006;69:891-5. https://doi.org/10.1021/np060051v
  13. Tsao PH. Chlamydospore formation in sporangium-free liquid cultures of Phytophthora parasitica. Phytopathology 1971;61:1412-3. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-61-1412
  14. Timmer LW, Sandler HA, Graham JH, Zitko SE. Sampling citrus orchards in Florida to estimate populations of Phytophthora parasitica. Phytopathology 1988;78:940-4. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-78-940
  15. Cacciola SO, Belisario A, Pane A, Magnano di San Lio G. Forsythia: a new host of Phytophthora nicotianae in Italy. Plant Dis 1994;78:525-8. https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-78-0525
  16. Alvarez LA, Perez-Sierra A, Armengol J, Garcia-Jimenez J. Characterization of Phytophthora nicotianae isolates causing collar and root rot of lavender and rosemary in Spain. J Plant Pathol 2007;89:261-4.
  17. Heller WE, Theiler-Hedtrich R. Antagonism of Chaetomium globosum, Gliocladium virens and Trichoderma viride to four soil-borne Phytophthora species. J Phytopathol 1994;141:390-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1994.tb04514.x
  18. Charoenporn C, Kanokmedhakul S, Lin FC, Poeaim S, Soytong K. Evaluation of bio-agent formulations to control Fusarium wilt of tomato. Afr J Biotechnol 2010;9:5836-44.
  19. Sibounnavong P, Charoenporn C, Kanokmedhakul S, Soytong K. Antifungal metabolites from antagonistic fungi used to control tomato wilt fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici. Afr J Biotechnol 2011;10:19714-22.
  20. Alabouvette C, Olivain C, Steinberg C. Biological control of plant diseases: the European situation. Eur J Plant Pathol 2006;114:329-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-005-0233-0
  21. Liu ZH, Yang Q, Hu S, Zhang JD, Ma J. Cloning and characterization of a novel chitinase gene (chi46) from Chaetomium globosum and identification of its biological activity. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2008;80:241-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-008-1543-x
  22. Park JH, Choi GJ, Jang KS, Lim HK, Kim HT, Cho KY, Kim JC. Antifungal activity against plant pathogenic fungi of chaetoviridins isolated from Chaetomium globosum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2005;252:309-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.femsle.2005.09.013
  23. Zhang G, Wang F, Qin J, Wang D, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhang S, Pan H. Efficacy assessment of antifungal metabolites from Chaetomium globosum No.05, a new biocontrol agent, against Setosphaeria turcica. Biol Control 2013;64:90-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2012.10.005
  24. Fang JG, Tsao PH. Evaluation of Pythium nunn as a potential biocontrol agent against Phytophthora root rots of azalea and sweet orange. Phytopathology 1995;85:29-36. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-29
  25. Fang JG, Tsao PH. Efficacy of Penicillium funiculosum as a biological control agent against Phytophthora root rots of azalea and citrus. Phytopathology 1995;85:871-8. https://doi.org/10.1094/Phyto-85-871
  26. Fogle MR, Douglas DR, Jumper CA, Straus DC. Growth and mycotoxin production by Chaetomium globosum. Mycopathologia 2007;164:49-56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11046-007-9023-x