Nuclear Engineering and Technology

Korean Nuclear Society (한국원자력학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

CURRENT RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ON FISSION PRODUCTS AND HYDROGEN RISK AFTER THE ACCIDENT AT FUKUSHIMA DAIICHI NUCLEAR POWER STATION

  • NISHIMURA, TAKESHI (Regulatory Standard and Research Department, Secretariat of Nuclear Regulation Authority (S/NRA/R)) ;
  • HOSHI, HARUTAKA (Regulatory Standard and Research Department, Secretariat of Nuclear Regulation Authority (S/NRA/R)) ;
  • HOTTA, AKITOSHI (Regulatory Standard and Research Department, Secretariat of Nuclear Regulation Authority (S/NRA/R))
  • Received : 2014.12.19
  • Accepted : 2014.12.31
  • Published : 2015.02.25
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

After the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant (NPP) accident, new regulatory requirements were enforced in July 2013 and a backfit was required for all existing nuclear power plants. It is required to take measures to prevent severe accidents and mitigate their radiological consequences. The Regulatory Standard and Research Department, Secretariat of Nuclear Regulation Authority (S/NRA/R) has been conducting numerical studies and experimental studies on relevant severe accident phenomena and countermeasures. This article highlights fission product (FP) release and hydrogen risk as two major areas. Relevant activities in the S/NRA/R are briefly introduced, as follows: 1. For FP release: Identifying the source terms and leak mechanisms is a key issue from the viewpoint of understanding the progression of accident phenomena and planning effective countermeasures that take into account vulnerabilities of containment under severe accident conditions. To resolve these issues, the activities focus on wet well venting, pool scrubbing, iodine chemistry (in-vessel and ex-vessel), containment failure mode, and treatment of radioactive liquid effluent. 2. For hydrogen risk: because of three incidents of hydrogen explosion in reactor buildings, a comprehensive reinforcement of the hydrogen risk management has been a high priority topic. Therefore, the activities in evaluation methods focus on hydrogen generation, hydrogen distribution, and hydrogen combustion.

Keywords

References

  1. Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), Fukushima Nuclear Accident Analysis Report, TEPCO, Tokyo, Japan, 2012.
  2. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (MEXT), Results of Airbone Monitoring by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology and the U.S. Department of Energy [Internet], 2012 [cited 2015 Jan 8]. Available: http://radioactivity.nsr.go.jp/en/contents/4000/3180/24/1304797_0506.pdf.
  3. Nuclear Regulation Authority, Outline of New Regulatory Requirements for Light Water Nuclear Power Plants (Severe Accident Measures) [Internet], 2013 [cited 2015 Jan 8]. Available: http://www.nsr.go.jp/english/data/new_regulatory_requirements3.pdf.
  4. Nuclear Emergency Response Headquarters Government of Japan, Report of Japanese Government to the IAEA Ministerial Conference on Nuclear SafetydThe Accident at TEPCO's Fukushima Nuclear Power Stations, Japanese Government, 2011.
  5. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR), Levels and Effects of Radiation Exposure Because of the Nuclear Accident after the 2011 Great East-Japan Earthquake and Tsunami, United Nations, New York, (NY, 2014.
  6. P.C. Owczarski, K.W. Burk, SPARC-90: A Code for Calculating Fission Product Capture in Suppression Pools, NUREG/CR-5765, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 1991.
  7. B. Clement, L. Cantrel, G. Dacros, State of the Art Report on Iodine Chemistry, NEA/CSNI/R(2007)1, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2007.
  8. K. Moriyama, Y. Maruyama, H. Nakamura, KICHE: A Simulation Tool for Kinetics of Iodine Chemistry in the Containment of Light Water Reactors under Severe Accident Conditions, JAEA-Data/Code 2010-034, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki, Japan, 2011.
  9. J.C. Wren, J.M. Ball, LIRIC 3.2 an updated model for Iodine behaviour in the presence of organic impurities, Radiat. Phys. Chem. 60 (2001) 577e596. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-806X(00)00385-6
  10. J. Ishikawa, K. Kawaguchi, Y. Maruyama, Analysis for iodine release from Unit 3 of Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant with consideration of water phase iodine chemistry, J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. (2014). Available on line: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00223131.2014.951417.
  11. G. Glowa, C. Moore, Behaviour of Iodine Project Final Summary Report, NEA/CSNI/R(2011)11, Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2011.
  12. B.R. Sehgal, Nuclear safety, in: Light Water Reactors: Severe Accident Phenomenology, Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2012, p. 369.
  13. D.A. Powers, J.E. Brockmann, A.W. Schiver, VANESA: A Mechanistic Model of Radionuclide Release and Aerosol Generation during Core Debris Interactions with Concrete, National Technical Information Service, Alexandria, VA, 1986.
  14. H. Hoshi, M. Ogino, R. Kawabe, M. Fukasawa, MELCOR analysis on TEPCO's Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS accident, in: 15th International Topical Meeting on Nuclear Reactor Thermal Hydraulics, NURETH-15, Pisa, Italy, May 12e17, 2013.
  15. H. Hoshi, M. Hirano, M. Iijima, T. Homma, Severe accident analyses of Fukushima-Daiichi Units 1 to 3, in: Side Event Updated Activities about TEPCO's Fukushima Dai-ichi NPS Accident at Fukushima Ministerial Conference on Nuclear Safety, 2012. Available online: http://www.atmos-chemphys-discuss.net/14/14725/2014/acpd-14-14725-2014.html.
  16. G. Katata, M. Chino, T. Kobayashi, H. Terada, M. Ota, H. Nagai, M. Kajino, R. Draxler, M.C. Hort, A.C. Malo, T.C. Torii, A.Y. Sanada, Detailed source term estimation of the atmospheric release for the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station accident by coupling simulations of atmospheric dispersion model with improved deposition scheme and oceanic dispersion model, Atoms Chem. Phys. Discuss. (2014) 14725e14832.
  17. Tokyo Electric Power Co, (TEPCO) Plant Data of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station at the Time of the Tohoku-Chihou-Taiheiyou-Oki Earthquake [Internet], TEPCO, Tokyo, Japan, 2011 [cited 2015 Jan 8]. Available: http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/nu/fukushima-np/index10-e.html.
  18. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Severe Accident Management Programmes for Nuclear Power Plants for Protecting People and the Environment, NS-G-2.15, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2009.
  19. Tokyo Electric Power Co. (TEPCO), Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station, Programs for Collection and Treatment of Radioactive Stagnant Water [Internet, in Japanese], 2011 [cited 2015 Jan 8]. Available: http://www.tepco.co.jp/nu/fukushima-np/images/handouts_111105_01-j.pdf.
  20. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA), In-vessel and Ex-vessel Hydrogen Sources, NEA/CSNI/R(2001)15, OECD/NEA, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2001.
  21. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA), Final Comparison Report on ISP-35: NUPEC Hydrogen Mixing and Distribution Test (Test M-7e1), NEA/CSNI/R(94)29, OECD/NEA, Issy-les- Moulineaux, France, 1994.
  22. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA), International Standard Problem 29, Distribution of Hydrogen within the HDR Containment under Severe Accident Conditions, NEA/CSNI/R(93)4, OECD/NEA, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 1993.
  23. International Atomic Energy Agency, Mitigation of Hydrogen Hazards in Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plants, IAEATECDOC-1661, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2011.
  24. Computer Soft Design Co., Analytical Support for the Verification Experiment of Reactor Containment Reliability, 1993 (in Japanese).
  25. K. Voelsing, GOTHIC Thermal Hydraulics Analysis Package Qualification Report, 2014.
  26. OECD/NEA, OECD SETH Project e Final Report of the PKL Experimental Programme part (2000-2004), NEA/CSNI/R(2004) 24, Apr. 1, 2004. http://www.oecd-nea.org/joinfproj/seth.html.
  27. OECD/NEA, OECD/SETH-2 PROJECT e Investigation of key issues for the simulation of thermal-hydraulic conditions in water reactor containment e Final Summary Report, NEA/CSNI/R(2012)5, Apr. 6, 2012. http://www.oecd-nea.org/joinfproj/seth2.html.
  28. OECD/NEA, OECD/NEA Hydrogen Mitigation Experiments for Reactor Safety (HYMERES), Jan., 2013. https://www.oecd-nea.org/jointproj/hymeres.html.
  29. T. Nishimura, CFD Simulation on Stratified Layer Erosion with Fine Grid Meshes, CFD4NRS-5: Application of CFD/CMFD Codes to Nuclear Reactor Safety and Design and their Experimental Validation, Sep 9e11 2014 [Poster].
  30. S. Dorofeev, V. Sidorov, Large-scale Experiment and Scaling of DDT Conditions in Hydrogen-Air-Steam MixturesdAn Overview, SARJ Workshop, Yokohama, Japan, Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute, Ibakari, Japan, October 6-8 1997.
  31. NUPEC, The Verification Experiment of Reactor Containment Reliability Burnable Gas Combustion Behavior Test, Tokyo, Japan, 1995 (in Japanese).
  32. R.T. Thompson, J.J. Haugh, B.R. Sehgal, EPRI NP-3878, Largescale Hydrogen Combustion Experiments, Methodology and Results, vol. 1, Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA, 1998.
  33. T.F. Kanzleiter, K.O. Fischer, Multi-compartment hydrogen deflagration experiments and model development, Nucl. Eng. Des. 146 (1994) 417e426. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(94)90347-6
  34. B.R. Sehgal, Nuclear Safety in Light Water Reactors: Severe Accident Phenomenology, Academic Press, Waltham, MA, 2012, p. 193.
  35. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development/Nuclear Energy Agency (OECD/NEA), Status Report on Hydrogen Management and Related Computer Codes, NEA/CSNI/R(2014)8, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2014.
  36. OECD/NEA, Hydrogen and Fission Product Issues Relevant for Containment Safety Assessment under Severe Accident Conditions, 1501326-FR 1, OECD/NEA, Issy-les-Moulineaux, France, 2010.
  37. A. Bentaib, A. Bleyer, A. Charlet, F. Malet, N. Djebaili-Chaumeix, H. Cheikhvarat, C.E. Paillard, Experimental and numerical study of flame propagation with hydrogen gradient in a vertical facility: ENACCEF, in: 8th ISHPMIE, September 5e10, 2010, Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire (IRSN), Cedex, France, 2010.

Cited by

  1. Research activities on nuclear reactor physics and thermal-hydraulics in Japan after Fukushima-Daiichi accident vol.55, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1417177
  2. Research activities on nuclear reactor physics and thermal-hydraulics in Japan after Fukushima-Daiichi accident vol.55, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2017.1417177
  3. Advances on identification and animated simulations of radioactivity risk levels after Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant accident (with a data bank): A Critical Review vol.321, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06559-w
  4. A flammability limit model for hydrogen-air-diluent mixtures based on heat transfer characteristics in flame propagation vol.51, pp.7, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.05.005
  5. Identification of hydrogen flammability in steam generator compartment of OPR1000 using MELCOR and CFX codes vol.51, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2019.06.024
  6. Steam oxidation behavior of Y-bearing cladding tube with aluminizing coating vol.7, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ab99e6
  7. Recent Progress in Hydrogen Flammability Prediction for the Safe Energy Systems vol.13, pp.23, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236263