DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Sustainability and International Environmental Agreements

  • Lin, Yu-Hsuan (Department of Economics, the Catholic University of Korea)
  • Received : 2015.01.28
  • Accepted : 2015.06.15
  • Published : 2015.06.30

Abstract

This paper examines the perceptions of sustainability, which is conceptualised as cross-generational social preferences, on the formation of international environmental agreements (IEAs) in a two-stage game in two periods. There are two scenarios are considered: myopic and sustainable development scenarios. The myopic scenario assumes the decision makers only concern the present welfare. Whilst the scenario of sustainable development has two characters: cross-generational fairness and altruism. When both are taken into account, a coalition will be expanded. The numerical example indicates that the marginal cost of the total emissions is the crucial factor for the formation of IEAs. Only when the marginal cost is low, a sustainable system can be succeeded. While, the technological advancement may lead to a more efficient production per unit of emissions, it also encourages countries to emit more in total and have a lower level of welfare. The results confirm the importance of sustainability to IEAs. The lesson learnt from this study is: when decision makers are myopic, the system is unsustainable even if an IEA is formed. Only when the perception of sustainability is considered, the system could be sustainable. Regardless of the existence of IEAs, international environmental conventions shall not neglect the fundamental goal to pursue sustainable development.

Keywords

References

  1. Barbier, E. B. and A. Markandya, "The Conditions for Achieving Environmentally Sustainable Development," European Economic Review, Vol. 34(2-3), 1990, pp. 659-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(90)90138-O
  2. Barrett, S., "Chapter 28. The Theory of International Environmental Agreements," In: Karl-Goran Maler and Jeffrey R. Vincent, Editor(s), Handbook of Environmental Economics. Vol. 3, 2005, pp. 1457-1516.
  3. Barrett, S., "Self-Enforcing International Environmental Agreements," Oxford Economic Paper, Vol. 46(1), 1994, pp. 878-894. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/46.Supplement_1.878
  4. Breton, M., L. Sbragia, and G. Zaccour, "A Dynamic Model for International Environmental Agreements," Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 45(1), 2010, pp. 25-48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9304-6
  5. Carraro, C. and D. Siniscalco, "International Environmental Agreements: Incentives and Political Economy," European Economic Review, Vol. 42 (3-5), 1998, pp. 561-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(97)00118-9
  6. D'Aspremont, C., A. Jacquemin, J. Gabszewicz, J. Weymark, "On the Stability of Collusive Price Leadership," Canadian Journal of Economics, Vol. 16(1), 1983, pp. 17-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/134972
  7. de Zeeuw, A., "Dynamic Effects on the Stability of International Environmental Agreements". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 55(2), 2008, pp. 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.06.003
  8. Georgescu-Roegen, N., The Entropy Law and the Economic Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
  9. Germain, M., P. Toint, H. Tulkens, and A. de Zeeuw, "Transfers to Sustain Dynamic Core-Theoretic Cooperation in International Stock Pollutant Control," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Vol. 28(1), 2003, pp. 79-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1889(02)00107-0
  10. Hamilton, K. and M. Clemens, "Genuine Savings Rates in Developing Countries". The World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 13(2), 1999, pp. 333-356. https://doi.org/10.1093/wber/13.2.333
  11. Hartwick, J. M., "Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources," American Economic Review, Vol. 67(5), 1977, pp. 972-74.
  12. Kyoto Protocol, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1997.
  13. Martinet, V., "A Characterization of Sustainability with Indicators". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 61(2), 2011, pp. 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2010.10.002
  14. Meadows, D. H., D. L. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens, The Limits to Growth, 1972.
  15. Nordhaus, W. D., Managing the Global Commons: the Economics of Climate Change. MIT Press, Cambridge, 1994.
  16. Pearce, D. W., Markandya, A. and Barbier, E., Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan: London, 1989.
  17. Pezzey, J. C. V., "Sustainability Constraints versus 'Optimality' versus Intertemporal Concern, and Axioms versus Data," Land Economics, Vol. 73(4), 1997, pp. 448-466. https://doi.org/10.2307/3147239
  18. Riley, J. G., "The Just Rate of Depletion of a Natural Resource," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 7(4), 1980, pp. 291-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(80)90023-6
  19. Rubio, S. J. and A. Ulph, "An Infinite-Horizon Model of Dynamic Membership of International Environmental Agreements," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 54(3), 2007, pp. 296-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2007.02.004
  20. Solow, R. M., "Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources," Review of Economic Studies, 1974, pp. 29-46.
  21. Stiglitz, J., "Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths," The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 41, 1974, pp. 123-137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2296377
  22. Toman, M. A., "Economics and "Sustainability": Balancing Trade-Offs and Imperatives," Land Economics, Vol. 70(4), 1994, pp. 399-413. https://doi.org/10.2307/3146637
  23. UNFCCC, FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05-62220 (E) 200705, 1992. http://unfccc.int/resource/ docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
  24. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development). Our Common Future. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 1987.
  25. Woodward, R. T., "Sustainability as Intergenerational Fairness: Efficiency, Uncertainty, and Numerical Methods," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 82(3), 2000, pp. 581-593. https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00048
  26. Yi, S. -S. "Stable Coalition Structures with Externalities," Games and Economic Behavior, Vol. 20(2), 1997, pp. 201-237. https://doi.org/10.1006/game.1997.0567