DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis on Effects of the Initial Condition and Emission on PM10 Forecasting with Data Assimilation

초기조건과 배출량이 자료동화를 사용하는 미세먼지 예보에 미치는 영향 분석

  • Park, Yun-Seo (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University) ;
  • Jang, Im-suk (Climate and Air Quality Research Department, National Institute of Environmental Research) ;
  • Cho, Seog-yeon (Department of Environmental Engineering, Inha University)
  • 박윤서 (인하대학교 환경공학과) ;
  • 장임석 (국립환경과학원 기후대기연구부) ;
  • 조석연 (인하대학교 환경공학과)
  • Received : 2015.06.29
  • Accepted : 2015.10.05
  • Published : 2015.10.31

Abstract

Numerical air quality forecasting suffers from the large uncertainties of input data including emissions, boundary conditions, earth surface properties. Data assimilation has been widely used in the field of weather forecasting as a way to reduce the forecasting errors stemming from the uncertainties of input data. The present study aims at evaluating the effect of input data on the air quality forecasting results in Korea when data assimilation was invoked to generate the initial concentrations. The forecasting time was set to 36 hour and the emissions and initial conditions were chosen as tested input parameters. The air quality forecast model for Korea consisting of WRF and CMAQ was implemented for the test and the chosen test period ranged from November $2^{nd}$ to December $1^{st}$ of 2014. Halving the emission in China reduces the forecasted peak value of $PM_{10}$ and $SO_2$ in Seoul as much as 30% and 35% respectively due to the transport from China for the no-data assimilation case. As data assimilation was applied, halving the emissions in China has a negligible effect on air pollutant concentrations including $PM_{10}$ and $SO_2$ in Seoul. The emissions in Korea still maintain an effect on the forecasted air pollutant concentrations even after the data assimilation is applied. These emission sensitivity tests along with the initial condition sensitivity tests demonstrated that initial concentrations generated by data assimilation using field observation may minimize propagation of errors due to emission uncertainties in China. And the initial concentrations in China is more important than those in Korea for long-range transported air pollutants such as $PM_{10}$ and $SO_2$. And accurate estimation of the emissions in Korea are still necessary for further improvement of air quality forecasting in Korea even after the data assimilation is applied.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker, D., T. Downs, M. Ku, W. Hao, G. Sistla, M. Kiss, M. Johnson, and D. Brown (2009) Sensitivity Testing of WRF Physics Parameterizations for Meteorological Modeling and Protocol in Support of Regional SIP Air Quality Modeling in the OTR, Ozone Transport Commission Modeling Committee.
  2. Carmichael, G.R., J.H. Woo, T. Ohara, and Q. Zhang (2012) Development of a "Mix for MICS" emission inventory for MICS-Asia phase III, TF HAP meeting.
  3. Chen, J., J. Vaughan, J. Avise, S. O'Neill, and B. Lamb (2008) Enhancement and evaluation of the AIRPACT ozone and PM2.5 forecast system for the Pacific Northwest, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D14305. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009554
  4. Kim, J.H. and S.Y. Cho (2003) A numerical simulation of present and future acid deposition in North East Asia using a comprehensive acid deposition model, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3375-3383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00355-8
  5. Kim, S.T., F. Ngan, H.C. Kim, and D.G. Lee (2014) Retrospective Air Quality Simulation of The TexAQS-II : Focused on Emissions Uncertainty, Asian J. Atmos. Environ., 8(4), 212-224. https://doi.org/10.5572/ajae.2014.8.4.212
  6. Koo, Y.S., S.T. Kim, J.S. Cho, and Y.K. Jang (2012) Performance evaluation of the updated air quality forecasting system for Seoul predicting $PM_{10}$, Atmos. Environ., 58, 56-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.02.004
  7. Monache, L.D. and R.B. Stull (2003) An ensemble air-quality forecast over western Europe during an ozone episode, Atmos. Environ., 37, 3469-3474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1352-2310(03)00475-8
  8. Nieradzik, L. and H. Elbern (2006) Variational assimilation of combined satellite retrieved and in situ aerosol data in an advanced chemistry transport model, Proceedings of the ESA Atmospheric Science Conference, Frascati, ESRIN.
  9. Stajner, I., P. Davidson, D. Byun, J. McQueen, R. Draxler, G. Manikin, K. Wedmark, K. Carey, and T. McClung (2011) NOAA's National Air Quality Forecast Guidance Capability: Reaching 50 States, 91st AMS Annual Meeting, 13th Conference on Atmospheric Chemistry, Seattle, Washington.
  10. US EPA (1999) Guideline for Developing an Ozone Forecasting Program, Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC (United States).
  11. US EPA (2015) National Ambient Air Quality Standards, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/naaqs/.
  12. Wagner, A., A.-M. Blechschmidt, I. Bouarar, E.-G. Brunke, C. Clerbaux, M. Cupeiro, P. Cristofanelli, H. Eskes, J. Flemming, H. Flentje, M. George, S. Gilge, A. Hilboll, A. Inness, J. Kapsomenakis, A. Richter, L. Ries, W. Spangl, O. Stein, R. Weller, and C. Zerefos (2015) Evaluation of the MACC operational forecast system-potential and challenges of global nearreal- time modelling with respect to reactive gases in the troposphere, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss, 15, 6277-6335. https://doi.org/10.5194/acpd-15-6277-2015
  13. Zhang, Y., M. Bocquet, V. Mallet, C. Seigneur, and A. Baklanov (2012) Real-time air quality forecasting, part I: History, techniques, and current status, Atmos. Environ., 60, 632-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.06.031

Cited by

  1. Human-model hybrid Korean air quality forecasting system vol.66, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/10962247.2016.1206995
  2. Analysis of Aerosol Optical Properties for High Particulate Matters and Light Asian Dust in Seoul Using GOCI vol.33, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.3.233
  3. Sensitivity Study of the Initial Meteorological Fields on the PM10 Concentration Predictions Using CMAQ Modeling vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2017.33.6.554
  4. A Development of Particulate Matter Forecasting System with Inverse Modeling using Source Contribution vol.34, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5572/KOSAE.2018.34.6.889