The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

  • 제27권4호
  • /
  • Pages.252-257
  • /
  • 2015
  • /
  • 1229-0475(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-156X(eISSN)
대한물리치료학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지

Is the SIS 3.0 Valid for Use at a Rehabilitation Setting in Korea for Patients with Stroke?

  • Song, Jumin (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health & Welfare, Silla University) ;
  • Lee, Haejung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health & Welfare, Silla University)
  • 투고 : 2015.07.23
  • 심사 : 2015.08.16
  • 발행 : 2015.08.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to assess psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0 (K-SIS 3.0) in patients with stroke. Methods: Patients with stroke longer than 3 months were invited to participate in the study at specialized rehabilitation centers in Busan. Information on patients was collected using Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Modified Bathel Index (MBI), Beck Depression Index (BDI), WHODAS 2.0-12 item, and K-SIS. Floor and ceiling effects of each domain of K-SIS were examined. The internal consistency of each domain of the K-SIS was calculated using Cronbach's ${\alpha}$. Correlation between K-SIS and each scale was assessed using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Results: Ninety subjects participated in the study. The K-SIS was found to have excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's ${\alpha}=0.93$). Each domain of the consistency ranged from 0.86 to 0.94, except the emotion (${\alpha}=0.51$). Significant correlations were observed between MMSE and domains of memory and thinking, and communication (r=0.48 and 0.52 respectively). BDI was negatively related to domains of emotion, ADL, mobility, and participation (r=-0.43, -0.49, -0.52 and -0.33 respectively). Specific daily activity (MBI) and general functioning (WHODAS 2.0) were also found to be closely related to the domains of ADL, mobility, and participation (ranging from r=-0.41 to r=-0.59). No ceiling and floor effect was observed. Conclusion: Excellent reliability and validity of K-SIS were obtained in the study and it could be suggested that K-SIS may be used for patients with stroke for collection of information on functioning in the clinical context.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Jonsson AC, Lindgren I, Hallstrom B et al. Determinants of quality of life in stroke survivors and their informal caregivers. Stroke. 2005;36(4):803-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.0000160873.32791.20
  2. Duncan PW. Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx. 2006;3(4):505-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurx.2006.07.009
  3. Song J, Lee H. Investigating functional level in patients with stroke using icf concept. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(5):315-57.
  4. Kranciukaite D, Rastenyte D. Measurement of quality of life in stroke patients. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania). 2006;42(9):709-16.
  5. Vellone E, Savini S, Fida R et al. Psychometric evaluation of the stroke impact scale 3.0. J Cardiovascular Nursing. 2015;30(3):229-41. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000145
  6. Salter KL, Moses MB, Foley NC et al. Health-related quality of life after stroke: What are we measuring? Int J Rehab Res. 2008;31(2):111-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e3282fc0f33
  7. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131-40. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131
  8. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S et al. Rasch analysis of a new strokespecific outcome scale: The stroke impact scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00035-2
  9. Dawson J, Doll H, Fitzpatrick R et al. Routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings. BMJ (Online). 2010;340(7744):464-7.
  10. Portney L, Watkins M. Foundations of clinical research: Applications to practice. 3rd. New Jersey, Pearson Education, 2009.
  11. Kim J. Relationship between gait symmetry and functional balance, walking performance in subjects with stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014;26(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1
  12. Yang D, Park S, Kang J et al. Effects of changes in postural alignment on foot pressure and balance of patients with stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2014; 26(4):226-33.
  13. Yoon M, Choi H, Shin W. Effects of the abdominal drawing-in maneuver and the abdominal expansion maneuver on grip strength, balance and pulmonary function in stroke patients. J Kor Phys Ther. 2015;27(3):147-53. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2015.27.3.147
  14. Kim Y, Lee D. Effects of dance sports in virtual reality on balance, depression and adl in stroke patients. J Kor Phys Ther. 2013;25(5):360-36.
  15. Kim H, Hwang Y, Yu J et al. The correlation between depression, motivation for rehabilitation, activities of daily living, and quality of life in stroke patients. J Korean Soc Occ Ther. 2009;17(3):41-53.
  16. Carod-Artal FJ, Coral LF, Trizotto DS et al. The stroke impact scale 3.0: Evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the brazilian version. Stroke. 2008;39(9):2477-84. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.513671
  17. Vellone E, Savini S, Barbato N et al. Quality of life in stroke survivors: First results from the reliability and validity of the italian version of the stroke impact scale 3.0. Annali di Igiene. 2010;22(5):469-79.
  18. Geyh S, Cieza A, Stucki G. Evaluation of the German translation of the stroke impact scale using rasch analysis. Clin Neuropsychologist. 2009;23(6):978-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802665782
  19. Mohammad AH, Al-Sadat N, Siew Yim L et al. Reliability and validity of the Nigerian (Hausa) version of the stroke impact scale (SIS) 3.0 index. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:302097.
  20. Kwon Y, Park J, No I. Standardization of Korean of the mini-mental state examination (mmse-k) for use in the elderly. Part II. Diagnostic validity. Neuropsychiatric assoc. 1989;28(3):508-13.
  21. Jung H, Park B, Shin H et al. Development of the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI): Multi-center study for subjects with stroke. J Kor Acad Rehabil Med. 2007;31(3):283- 97.
  22. Hahn H, Yum T, Shin Y et al. A standardization study of beck depression inventory in Korea. J Korean Neuropsychiatry Assoc. 1986;25:487-502.
  23. Garin O, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Almansa J et al. Validation of the "World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule, WHODAS-2.0" in patients with chronic diseases. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2010;8.
  24. Lee H, Kim D. Internal consistency and concurrent validity of korean language version of whodas 2.0: 12 item-self administered. J Kor Phys Ther. 2011;23(6):23-9.
  25. Duncan PW, Lai SM, van Culin V et al. Development of a comprehensive assessment toolbox for stroke. Clin Geriatric Med. 1999;15(4):885-915.
  26. Lee H, Song J. The Korean language version of stroke impact scale 3.0: Cross-cultural adaptation and translation. J Kor Soc Phys Med. In press.
  27. Hamza AM, Al-Sadat N, Loh SY et al. Predictors of poststroke healthrelated quality of life in nigerian stroke survivors: A 1-year follow-up study. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:350281.
  28. Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: Icf participation. Dis & Rehabil. 2005; 27(9):507-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963828040008552