DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Displacement pattern of the anterior segment using antero-posterior lingual retractor combined with a palatal plate

  • Seo, Kyung-Won (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kwon, Soon-Yong (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Kyung A (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Park, Ki-Ho (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Hun (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Ahn, Hyo-Won (Department of Orthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Nelson, Gerald (Division of Orthodontics, Department of Orofacial Science, University of California San Francisco)
  • Received : 2015.05.14
  • Accepted : 2015.07.15
  • Published : 2015.11.25

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effects of two appliances on the en masse retraction of the anterior teeth anchored by temporary skeletal anchorage devices (TSADs). Methods: The sample comprised 46 nongrowing hyperdivergent adult patients who planned to undergo upper first premolar extraction using lingual retractors. They were divided into three groups, based on the lingual appliance used: the C-lingual retractor (CLR) group (group 1, n = 16) and two antero-posterior lingual retractor (APLR) groups (n = 30, groups 2 and 3). The APLR group was divided by the posterior tube angulation; posterior tube parallel to the occlusal plane (group 2, n = 15) and distally tipped tube (group 3, n = 15). A retrospective clinical investigation of the skeletal, dental, and soft tissue relationships was performed using lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained pretreatment and post en masse retraction of the anterior teeth. Results: All groups achieved significant incisor and canine retraction. The upper posterior teeth did not drift significantly during the retraction period. The APLR group had less angulation change in the anterior dentition, compared to the CLR group. By changing the tube angulation in the APLR, the intrusive force significantly increased in the distally tipped tube of group 3 patients and remarkably reduced the occlusal plane angle. Conclusions: Compared to the CLR, the APLR provides better anterior torque control and canine tipping while achieving bodily translation. Furthermore, changing the tube angulation will affect the amount of incisor intrusion, even in patients with similar palatal vault depth, without the need for additional TSADs.

Keywords

References

  1. Hong RK, Heo JM, Ha YK. Lever-arm and miniimplant system for anterior torque control during retraction in lingual orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 2005;75:129-41.
  2. Lee EH, Yu HS, Lee KJ, Park YC. Three dimensional finite element analysis of continuous and segmented arches with use of orthodontic miniscrews. Korean J Orthod 2011;41:237-54. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2011.41.4.237
  3. Jeong GM, Sung SJ, Lee KJ, Chun YS, Mo SS. Finite-element investigation of the center of resistance of the maxillary dentition. Korean J Orthod 2009;39:83-94. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2009.39.2.83
  4. Chung KR, Oh MY, Ko SJ. Corticotomy-assisted orthodontics. J Clin Orthod 2001;35:331-9.
  5. Mo SS, Kim SH, Sung SJ, Chung KR, Chun YS, Kook YA, et al. Torque control during lingual anterior retraction without posterior appliances. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:3-14. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.1.3
  6. Chung KR, Kook YA, Kim SH, Mo SS, Jung JA. Class II malocclusion treated by combining a lingual retractor and a palatal plate. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;133:112-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.033
  7. Nelson G, Ahn HW, Jeong SH, Kim JS, Kim SH, Chung KR. Three-dimensional retraction of anterior teeth with orthodontic miniplates in patients with temporomandibular disorder. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;142:720-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.07.029
  8. Kim JS, Kim SH, Kook YA, Chung KR, Nelson G. Analysis of lingual en masse retraction combining a C-lingual retractor and a palatal plate. Angle Orthod 2011;81:662-9. https://doi.org/10.2319/100110-574.1
  9. Kwon SY, Kim Y, Ahn HW, Kim KB, Chung KR, Kim Sunny SH. Computer-aided designing and manufacturing of lingual fixed orthodontic appliance using 2D/3D registration software and rapid prototyping. Int J Dent 2014;2014:164164.
  10. Kwon SY, Ahn HW, Kim SH, Park YG, Chung KR, Paik CH, et al. Antero-posterior lingual sliding retraction system for orthodontic correction of hyperdivergent Class II protrusion. Head Face Med 2014;10:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-160X-10-22
  11. Kim SH, Hwang YS, Ferreira A, Chung KR. Analysis of temporary skeletal anchorage devices used for enmasse retraction: a preliminary study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:268-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.023
  12. Jee JH, Ahn HW, Seo KW, Kim SH, Kook YA, Chung KR, et al. En-masse retraction with a preformed nickel- titanium and stainless steel archwire assembly and temporary skeletal anchorage devices without posterior bonding. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:236-45. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.5.236
  13. Melsen B. Biological reaction of alveolar bone to orthodontic tooth movement. Angle Orthod 1999;69:151-8.
  14. Ahn HW, Moon SC, Baek SH. Morphometric evaluation of changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxillary anterior teeth before and after en masse retraction using cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2013;83:212-21. https://doi.org/10.2319/041812-325.1
  15. Park JH, Tai K, Takagi M, Miyajima K, Kojima Y, Joo BH. Esthetic orthodontic treatment with a double J retractor and temporary anchorage devices. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:796-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.01.024
  16. Hong RK, Lim SM, Heo JM, Baek SH. Orthodontic treatment of gummy smile by maxillary total intrusion with a midpalatal absolute anchorage system. Korean J Orthod 2013;43:147-58. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2013.43.3.147

Cited by

  1. Wide Linear Corticotomy and Anterior Segmental Osteotomy Under Local Anesthesia Combined Corticision for Correcting Severe Anterior Protrusion With Insufficient Alveolar Housing vol.28, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003903
  2. Maxillary Corticotomies With Bone-to-Bone Retraction and Mandibular Segmental Osteotomy for Correcting an Anterior Double Protrusion vol.28, pp.8, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003925
  3. Single-Tooth Osteotomy Combined Wide Linear Corticotomy Under Local Anesthesia for Correcting Anterior Protrusion With Ectopically Erupted Canine vol.28, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000003179
  4. Control of anterior segment using an antero-posterior lingual sliding retraction system: a preliminary cone-beam CT study vol.19, pp.None, 2015, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-017-0202-0
  5. Finite Element Analysis of Stress in Maxillary Dentition during En-masse Retraction with Implant Anchorage vol.60, pp.1, 2015, https://doi.org/10.2209/tdcpublication.2017-0055
  6. Type of tooth movement during en masse retraction of the maxillary anterior teeth using labial versus lingual biocreative therapy in adults: A randomized clinical trial vol.49, pp.6, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2019.49.6.381