Journal of the Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회논문집)

The Korean Society for Railway (한국철도학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Gilhoe Line Construction and the Consignment of the North Korean Railroad by the South Manchuria Railways

만철의 길회선 부설과 북선철도 위탁과정에 관한 연구

  • Lee, Yongsang (Department of Railroad Management, Woosong University) ;
  • Chung, Byunghyun (Department of Transportation & Logistics, Woosong University) ;
  • Bae, Eunsun (PR & Cultural Affairs Office, Korea Railroad Corp.)
  • Received : 2015.07.14
  • Accepted : 2015.09.23
  • Published : 2015.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper analyses the decision process of the Gilhoe Line construction of the Manchurian Railway and consignment process of the North Korea Line to the South Manchuria Railways as part of the 12-year Chosun railway plan. It was found that these two events were connected and could be explained by Japan's consistent continental policy, which had expanded its territory toward China. This paper explicates Japan's railroad policy and the characteristics of the Chosun railway. Moreover, evidence to identify connections among Japan's national railway, the Manchurian railway, and the Chosun railway has been scrutinized. One territory policy between Chosun and Manchuria is also examined. Comparison of new resources on the Gilhoe Line construction of the Manchurian railway and the 12-year plan of the Chosun railway, and their correlations, is expounded. This paper elucidates that the Gilhoe Line construction and the North Korea line consignment operation by the South Manchuria Railways had the intention of obtaining Japanese military and economic supremacy over East Asia.

본 연구에서는 남만주철도주식회사가 추진하였던 길회선 부설과 조선철도12년계획에 의해 부설된 북선철도가 만철에 위탁되는 과정에 대하여 분석하였다. 일본의 대륙정책 추진과정에서 중요한 두 가지 사건인 길회선과"조선철도12년계획"을 연계하여 당시의 관련된 정책을 설명해 보고자 하였으며, 이러한 연구를 통해 일본의 만철에 대한 정책과 조선철도의 성격을 좀 더 분명히 할 수 있을 것이다. 또한 기존 연구자들이 주장하고 있는 일본국유철도, 만철, 조선철도의 연결성을 본 사례를 통해 검증하고자 하며, 선만일체론에 대해서도 검증하고자 한다. 본 연구는 기존연구와 달리 일본국내의 정책결정과정을 통해 조선철도정책의 실상을 검증해 보고자 하였다. 아울러 본 논문에서는 추가적으로 새롭게 발굴된 자료와 내지인 일본과 조선 만주의 철도제도를 비교해 보면서 이의 연관성을 함께 설명해 보고자 하였다. 본 연구를 통해 길회선 부설과 북선철도 만철 위탁의 연계성을 확인할 수 있었다. 길회선과 북선철도에 대한 만철의 일체적 경영에서 군사적, 경제적, 동아시아의 주도권 등을 잡으려는 일본의 정책 흐름도 발견할 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. I. Tetso (2012) The construction of railway and port in northern Korea by SMR.Co., Niigata University East Asian Rim Research Center annual report, 7.
  2. Y. Kenichi (2000) The transformation of the ring Sea of Japan community: Majima.Manmo.Japan Sea region, Aoki press.
  3. K. koyohumi (1997) The issue of Gilhoe line construction, Society of Japan Colonial Study annual report, 9.
  4. J.J. Chung (1999) Japan emperor aggression and Korean railroad, Seoul national university press, pp.147-154.
  5. J.J. Chung (2007) Railway officials and railway policy of the Japanese Government General of Korea - Focused on Omuradakuchi, International Research Center for Japanese Studies International symposium 30, Tokyo, pp.189-211.
  6. T. Nakami.H. Matukasa.H.Kobayashi.N.Sugita etc(2006) What was Manchurian, Fujihara press, Japan, pp.244-246.
  7. H. Hiroshi (1982) Chousun Railway by South Manchuria Railway consignment - one aspect of Japanese colonial rule after World War I -, Society of Chosun History annual report, 19. pp.151-184.
  8. Yajimakiyo (2010) 12 national railways year plan in colony Korea, History and Economics, 52(2), pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/18386318.2010.11682161
  9. G.R. Kim (1987) A study on the line of Chosun Railway 12-year plan, Master's Thesis, Ewha womans University.
  10. O. Tekkou (1927) 12-year plan of Chosun railway, Chosun Manchuria Railway Courier company.
  11. D.H. Kim (2006) A study on 12-year plan of Chosun Railway, Historical study essays, Beppu university, pp. 41-73.
  12. Senkokai (1986) Chosun transport history and translation edition by Korean railroad culture foundation 2013, Chosun Transport History, Book gallery, pp. 107-110.
  13. T. Takashi (1995) Japanese colonial railroad history, Japanese economy criticism company, pp. 100-107.
  14. E.S. Bae, B.H. Chung, Y.S. Lee (2014) A study on the Korean railway property during the South Manchuria Railway Period, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 17(4), pp. 297-306. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2014.17.4.297
  15. Y.S. Lee, B.H. Chung (2013) A comparative study of the Korean and Manchuria railway systems during the Japan colonial Period, Journal of the Korean Society for Railway, 16(2), p. 151-162. https://doi.org/10.7782/JKSR.2013.16.2.151
  16. J.J. Chung (2007) Railway officer Omuradakuchi at General of Korea abd Chosun railway connection policy, Hisotory education. pp. 106.
  17. K. koyohumi (1997) The issue of Gilhoe line construction, Society of Japan Colonial Study annual report, 9. pp. 32-42.
  18. Senkokai (1986) Chosun transport history and translatno edition by Korean railroad culture foundation 2013, Chosun Transport History, Book gallery, pp. 111.
  19. Senkokai (1986) Chosun transport history and translatno edition by Korean railroad culture foundation 2013, Chosun Transport History, Book gallery, pp. 108-109.
  20. L. Bookstore (1981-1988) The imperial parliament the house of representatives, Proceedings of the 51, 52 times, Amending the chosun business loan law stenographic records.
  21. M. Giichi (2003) Murakami Documents, Microfilm at Keio University's contents(5A-1).
  22. I. Tetso (2012) The construction of railway and port in Northern Korea by SMR.Co., Niigata University East Asian Rim Research Center annual report, 7, pp. 63-64.
  23. T. Nakami.H. Matukasa.H.Kobayashi.N.Sugita etc(2006) What was Manchurian, Fujihara press, Japan, pp. 251-252.
  24. South Manchuria Railways Corporation (1932) South Manchuria Railways Corporation 30 years outline history, pp. 344-348.
  25. K. Ishimori (1927) The issue of Manchuria and Mongolia development & Rajin harbor construction, Korea public opinion(177), pp. 514-517.
  26. Osaka Mainichi newspaper(1917.5.18)
  27. South Manchuria Railways Corporation (1932) South Manchuria Railways Corporation 30 years outline history, pp. 244-245.
  28. M. Kobayashi (1996) Japanese continent policy, Nansyoushya, pp. 303.
  29. I. Hajime (1996) Korea "assimilation" idea of empire Japan of the self-portrait -1920 generation, Nitumeikan langage culture research, 8(3), pp. 5-22.
  30. O. Takuichi (1944) Living-inn the continent, Katsushin company, pp. 187-189.
  31. O. Takuichi (1944) Living-inn the continent, Katsushin company, pp. 242-250.
  32. M. Giichi (2003) Murakami documents, Microfilm at Keio University's contents(5A-1).
  33. M. Giichi (2003) Murakami documents, Microfilm at Keio University's contents(5A-1).
  34. T. Himeno (1932) Theory of the governor of the South Manchuria Railway Corporation, Nishi mondai kenkyukai, pp. 8.
  35. I. Tetso (2012) The construction of railway and port in Northern Korea by SMR.Co., Niigata University East Asian Rim Research Center annual report, 7, pp. 61-62.
  36. K. koyohumi (1970) The issue of Gilhoe line construction, Society of Japan Colonial Study annual report, 9. pp. 44-45.
  37. Murakami Documents, Microfilm at Keio University's contents(6F-4, 1932 year January 19 written by Navy).
  38. K. Ishimori (1927) The issue of Manchuria and Mongolia development & Rajin harbor construction, Korea public opinion(177), pp. 517.
  39. S. Yuichi (2006) Military transportation and the Pusan - Siberia dispatch of troops in the colony period Korea train service - Mainly on Manchurian Incident, Yahata University, Social culture Institute bulletin, 59, pp. 1-54.
  40. Kyukougai (1930) Manchuria economic and Japanese imperialism, hakuyo-sha, pp. 279-281.