ETRI Journal

Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (한국전자통신연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Generation Expansion Planning Model Supporting Diverse Environmental Policies for Reduction of Greenhouse Gases

  • Lee, Jeong-In (IT Convergence Technology Research Laboratory, ETRI) ;
  • Lee, Il-Woo (IT Convergence Technology Research Laboratory, ETRI) ;
  • Kim, Bal-Ho (Department of Electronic and Electrical Engineering, Hongik University)
  • Received : 2014.08.10
  • Accepted : 2015.02.11
  • Published : 2015.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to a develop model for generation expansion planning that can support diverse environmental policies for the reduction of greenhouse gases (GHGs) of South Korea. South Korea is required to reduce its GHG emissions by 30% from the BAU level by 2020. The Wien Automatic System Planning Package currently used in South Korea has limitations in terms of the application of renewable energy policies and GHG targets; this paper proposes the use of an equipment planning model named generation and transmission expansion program, which has been developed to resolve such limitations. For verification of the model, a case study on the 6th Basic Plan of Long-Term Electricity Supply and Demand has been conducted. The results show that for the year 2020 South Korea's annual GHG emissions will be 36.6% more than the GHG Target Management System (GHG TMS) target set for the same year (30%). To achieve the GHG TMS target, the costs involved amount to about 72 trillion KRW (70 billion USD). Consequently, the South Korean government needs to review the performability of this target.

Keywords

References

  1. Ministry of Government Legislation, Enforcement Decree of the Framework Act on Low Carbon, Green Growth, Ministry of Government Legislation, Rep. of Korea, 2010. Accessed Feb. 12, 2012. http://www.moleg.go.kr/english/korLawEng?pstSeq=54792
  2. IETA (International Emissions Trading Association), The World's Carbon Markets: A Case Study Guide to Emissions Trading, Discussion Paper, European Development Fund, 2013.
  3. Greenhouse Gas Inventory & Research center of Korea, "National Greenhouse Gas Inventory Report," Greenhouse Gas Inventory & Research center of Korea, Seoul, Rep. of Korea, Tech. Rep. 11-1480745-000003-10, Feb. 2013.
  4. Korea Power Exchange, 6th Basic Plan for Long-Term Electricity Supply & Demand of Electric Power, Korea Power Exchange, 2012. Accessed Aug. 12, 2013. http://www.motie.go.kr/motie/in/ay/policynotify/announce/bbs/bbsView.do?bbs_seq_n=61532&bbs_cd_n=6
  5. International Atomic Energy Agency, "Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP) Package: A Computer Code for Power Generating System Expansion Planning - User's Manual," Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 2000, pp. 19-251.
  6. R.T. Jenkins and D.S. Joy, "Wien Automatic System Planning Package (WASP): An Electric Utility Optimal Generation Expansion Planning Computer Code," Virginia, USA: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1974, pp. 197-222.
  7. A. Rouhani, G. Varamimi, and M. Nikkaha, "Generation Expansion Planning Considering Renewable Energies," American J. Eng. Res., vol. 2, no. 11, Feb. 2013, pp. 276-286.
  8. Y.-M. Park et al., "Generation Expansion Planning Based on an Advanced Evolutionary Programming," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 14, no. 1, Aug. 1999. pp. 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.744547
  9. Y. Fujii and K. Akimoto, "Optimal Power System Expansion Planning under Uncertain $CO_2$ Emissions Control Policies," Electr. Eng. Japan, vol. 117, no. 5, Feb. 1996, pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1002/eej.4391170501
  10. J.-I. Lee, S-H. Han, and B.H. Kim, "A Study of the Long-Term Fuel Mix with the Introduction of Renewable Portfolio Standard," Trans. Korea Institute Electr. Eng., vol. 58, no. 3, Mar. 2009, pp. 467-477.
  11. S. Hwang and B.H. Kim, "A Study on the Generation Expansion Planning Model Reflecting Environmental Policies," Adv. Mater. Res., vol. 962, no. 1, June 2014, pp. 2210-2219.
  12. J. Zhu and M.-Y. Chow, "A Review of Emerging Techniques on Generation Expansion Planning," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 12, no. 4, Nov. 1997, pp. 1722-1728. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.627882
  13. K.H. Chung, B.H. Kim, and D. Hur, "A New Approach to Generation Scheduling in Interconnected Power Systems Using Predictor-Corrector Proximal Multiplier Method," Electr. Eng., vol. 94, no. 3, Aug. 2012, pp. 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-012-0235-9
  14. S. Porkar et al., "Distribution System Planning Considering Integration of Distributed Generation and Load Curtailment Options in a Competitive Electricity Market," Electr. Eng., vol. 93, no. 1, Mar. 2011, pp. 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-010-0189-8
  15. Y.M Park, J.B. Park, and J.R. Won, "A Hybrid Genetic Algorithm/Dynamic Programming Approach to Optimal Long-Term Generation Expansion Planning," Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst., vol. 20, no. 4, May 1998, pp. 295-303. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-0615(97)00070-7
  16. Z. Zhao et al., "An Optimal Power Scheduling Method Applied in Home Energy Management System Based on Demand Response," ETRI J., vol. 35, no. 4, Aug. 2013, pp. 677-686. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.13.0112.0625
  17. Y.-C. Kim and B.H. Ahu, "Multicriteria Generation-Expansion Planning with Global Environmental Considerations," IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 40, no. 2, May 1993, pp. 154-161.
  18. J.-B. Park et al., "An Improved Genetic Algorithm for Generation Expansion Planning," IEEE Trans. Power Syst., vol. 15, no. 3, Aug. 2000, pp. 916-922.
  19. Y.M. Park, "Long-Term Generation Expansion Planning with Consideration of $CO_2$ Emission," Trans. Korean Institute Electr. Eng., vol. 43, no. 3, Nov. 1998, pp. 263-268.
  20. Y. Park, and S. Kim, "Bargaining-Based Smart Grid Pricing Model for Demand Side Management Scheduling," ETRI J., vol. 37, no. 1, Feb. 2015, pp. 197-202. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.15.0114.0007
  21. S. Kim, "An Adaptive Smart Grid Management Scheme Based on the Coopetition Game Model," ETRI J., vol. 36, no. 1, Feb. 2014, pp. 80-88. https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.14.0113.0042
  22. G. Byun et al., "Analysis of the RPS System in Korea Based on SCP Framework," Int. Conf., FutureTech, Loutraki, Greece, June 28-30, 2011, pp. 288-295.
  23. J.W. Shin et al., "Analyzing Public Preferences and Increasing Acceptability for the Renewable Portfolio Standard in Korea," Energy Economics, vol. 42, no. 2, Mar. 2014, pp. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.11.014
  24. Korea Energy Management Corporation, Overview of New and Renewable Energy in Korea 2013, KEMCO, 2013. Accessed Feb. 2014. http://www.kemco.or.kr/new_eng/pg02/pg02040300.asp
  25. United Nations Environment Programme, Overview of the Republic of Korea's Nation Strategy for Green Growth, UNEP, 2010. Accessed Apr. 2013. http://www.unep.org/PDF/PressReleases/201004_unep_national_strategy.pdf
  26. J.A. Bloom, "Long-Range Generation Planning Using Decomposition and Probabilistic Simulation," IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Syst., vol. 4, no. 4, Apr. 1982, pp. 797-802.
  27. S.-M. Han, K.-H. Chung, and B.H. Kim, "ISO Coordination of Generator Maintenance Scheduling in Competitive Electricity Markets Using Simulated Annealing," J. Electr. Eng. Technol., vol. 6, no. 4, Oct. 2011, pp. 431-438. https://doi.org/10.5370/JEET.2011.6.4.431
  28. R.W. Jefferson and R.N. Boisvert, "A Guide to Using the General Algebraic Modelling System (GAMS) for Applications in Agricultural Economics," New York, NY, USA: Dept. of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, 1989, pp. 58-66.
  29. International Emissions Trading Association, "Wien Automatic System Planning (WASP) Package: A Computer Code for Power Generating System Expansion Planning Version WASP-IV with User Interface User's Manual," Vienna, Austria: IAEA, 2006, pp. 13-150.

Cited by

  1. Visible Light Communication Method for Personalized and Localized Building Energy Management vol.38, pp.4, 2015, https://doi.org/10.4218/etrij.16.0116.0120
  2. Feasibility Study of the Post-2020 Commitment to the Power Generation Sector in South Korea vol.9, pp.2, 2015, https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020307