DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Central Line Insertion Bundle on the Adherence of Bundle and Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections in the Operating Room

수술실에서 중심정맥관 삽입 시 번들적용이 중심정맥관 관련 혈류감염에 미치는 영향

  • Shin, Eun Jeong (University of Ulsan Graduate School of Industrial Technology, Department of Nursing, Ulsan University Hospital) ;
  • Jeong, Jae Sim (Department of Nursing, Department of Clinical Nursing, University of Ulsan College of Medicine) ;
  • Choi, Sang Ho (Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center) ;
  • Huh, In Young (Department of Anesthesiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital)
  • 신은정 (울산대학교 산업대학원.울산대학교병원 간호본부) ;
  • 정재심 (울산대학교 의과대학 간호학과.임상전문간호학) ;
  • 최상호 (울산대학교 의과대학 서울아산병원 감염내과) ;
  • 허인영 (울산대학교 의과대학 울산대학교병원 마취통증의학과)
  • Received : 2016.10.28
  • Accepted : 2016.11.23
  • Published : 2016.11.30

Abstract

Background: This study purposed to examine how the incidence of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) in a operating room (OR) is affected by bundle application on central line insertion (CLI) practice. Methods: The study design was a pretest-posttest experimental trial. The subjects were 83 patients before the bundle application on CLI and 70 patients after. Results: The compliance(%) of bundle on CLI of among those who observed all of the five items increased from 7.2% before the intervention to 72.9% after. By items, compliance with the maximal barrier precaution was 100% for the use of a mask and cap before and after the intervention, but increased from 73.5% before the intervention to 88.6% after for the hand hygiene, from 73.5% to 88.6% for the use of a sterile gown, and from 9.6% to 75.7% for the use of a sterile large drape covering the whole body. CLABSI did not happen on CLI either before or after the application of the bundle intervention. Conclusion: Bundle application increased compliance with the use of a sterile gown and the use of a sterile large drape. However, its effect in the prevention of CLABSI was not clear probably due to the short period of intervention in a single hospital.

Keywords

References

  1. Bishop L, Dougherty L, Bodenham A, Mansi J, Crowe P, Kibber C, et al. Guideline on the insertion and management of central venous access devices in adults. International Journal of Laboratory Hematology. 2007;29:261-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-553X.2007.00931.x
  2. Exline M, Ali N, Zikri N, Mangino J, Torrence K, Vermillion B, et al. Beyond the bundle-journey of a tertiary care medical intensive care unit to zero central line-associated bloodstream infections. Critical Care. 2013;17(2):R4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/cc12551
  3. Pronovost PJ, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H ,Cosgrove S, et al. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2006;355(26):2725-2732. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa061115
  4. Kim HB. Intervention to decrease central line-associated bloodsteram infection in the ICU. Final report. Seongnam: Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2013 Dec. Report No.: 11-1352159-000137-01.
  5. Lobo RD, Levin AS, Brasileiro Gomes LM, Cursino R, Park M, Figueiredo VB, et al. Impact of an educational program and policy changes on decreasing catheter-associated bloodstream infections in a medical intensive care unit in Brazil. American Journal of Infection Control. 2005;33(2):83-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2004.05.003
  6. Shertz RJ., Wesley Ely E, Westbrook DM, Gledhill KS, Streed SA, Kiger B, et al. Education of physicians-in-training can decease the risk vascular catheter infection. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2000;132(8):641-648. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-132-8-200004180-00007
  7. Rubin L, Wu AW, Haponik EF, Diette GB. Why is it that internists do not follow guidelines for preventing intravascular cather infections? Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2005;26(6):525-533. https://doi.org/10.1086/502579
  8. Korean Society for Healthcare-associated Infection Control and Prevention. KONIS MANUAL 2014 [Internet]. Seoul: Korea Centers For Disease Control & Prevention; 2014 June 25 [cited 2016 Oct 26]. Available from:http://konis.cdc.go.kr/konis/index.jsp.
  9. Pai HJ. Multicenter intervention study for the preventiont bloodstream infections. Public Heath Weekly Report. 2008;29(1):484-488.
  10. Jeong IS, Park SM, Lee JM, Song JY, Lee SJ. Effect of central line bundle on central line-associated bloodstream infections in intensive care units. American Journal of Infection Control. 2013;41(8):710-716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.010
  11. Kang MH, Kim DO. Effects of a short message service intervention on adherence to maximal sterile barrier precautions and cather-related blood stream infections. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2012;18(2):244-250. https://doi.org/10.11111/jkana.2012.18.2.244
  12. Yoo JY, Kim EJ, Yun IS, Lee JS, Lee J, Byun JM, et al. Impact of maximal sterile barrier during the insertion of central venous catheters in adults intensive care units. The Korean Journal of Nosocomial Infection Control. 2007;12(1): 36-41.