DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of thoracic cage mobilization on respiratory function, spinal curve and spinal movement in patients with restrictive lung disease

  • Received : 2016.07.15
  • Accepted : 2016.09.07
  • Published : 2016.10.30

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the effects of thoracic cage mobilization on the respiratory function, spinal curve and spinal movement in patients with restrictive lung diseases. The subjects were ten community-dwelling elderly with a restrictive lung diseases when measured using a spirometer($FEV1/FVC{\leq}65%$, FVC<80%). They received an intervention over an eight-week period: three times a week and for 30 minutes a day. SPSS for Windows(ver. 19.0) was used to analyze all the collected data. Independent t-tests were used to examine changes before and after the intervention. The study's results showed statistically significant improvement(p<.05) in forced expiratory volume in 1 second(chage rate: .$24{\pm}.25$), thoracic curve(chage rate: $-2.50{\pm}2.76$), lumbar curve(chage rate: $-.80{\pm}1.32$), thoracic flexion(chage rate: $2.10{\pm}1.52$), thoracic extension(chage rate: $-2.00{\pm}1.25$), lumbar flexion(chage rate: $2.40{\pm}3.13$) and lumbar extension(chage rate: $-1.30{\pm}1.42$). The results of this study suggest that the thoracic cage mobilization contribute to improve pulmonary function in patients with restrictive lung disease.

Keywords

References

  1. Dunnil MS. The anatomy of restrictive lung disease. Human Pathology, 1970; 1(2): 265-274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0046-8177(70)80039-9
  2. Lee WY. Geriatric respiratory diseases. Koeran J Med 1985: 28(5): 602-610.
  3. Burr ML, phillips KM, Hurst DN. Lung function in the elderly. Thorax 1985; 40: 54-59. https://doi.org/10.1136/thx.40.1.54
  4. Oh YM. How many patients with mixed spirometric pattern really have restrictive disorders?. Tuberc Respir Dis 1999; 47(6): 836-842. https://doi.org/10.4046/trd.1999.47.6.836
  5. Dyer CAE, Stockley RA. The aging lung. Reviews in Clinical Gerontology 2006; 16(2), 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0959259807002109
  6. Lee JM. The measurement of normal thoraci kyphosis in korean. J Korean Orthop Assoc 1982; 17(5), 772-778. https://doi.org/10.4055/jkoa.1982.17.5.772
  7. Ebert R, et al. Lumbar spine side bending is reduced in end range extension compared to neutral and end range flexion postures. Man Ther 2014; 19(2), 114-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.08.004
  8. Jones AY, Dean E, Chow CC. Comparison of the oxygen cost of breathing exercises and spontaneous breathing in patients with stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Phys Ther 2003; 83(5): 424-431.
  9. Klefbeck B, Hamrah Nedjad J. Effect of inspiratory muscle training in patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84(7): 994-999. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00133-3
  10. Pil-Neo Hwangbo PN. The effects of thoracic joint mobilization and self stretching exercise on the pulmonary function of patients with chronic neck pain. The Graduate School of Daegu University, Dept. of Sports & Orthopaedic Physical Therapy 2011.
  11. Kingston L, Claydon L, Tumilty S. The effects of spinal mobilizations on the sympathetic nervous system: a systematic review. Man Ther 2014; 19(4): 281-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2014.04.004
  12. Ko TS, Jung HB, Kim JA. The effects of thoracic mobilization on pain, disability index and spinal mobility in chronic low back pain patients. J Spec Educ Rehabil Sci 2009; 48(2): 115-137.
  13. Kwon YC, Park JH. Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE) Part I: development of the test for the eldery. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 1989; 28: 125-135.
  14. Post RB, Leferink VJ. Spinal mobility: Sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2004; 124(3), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-004-0641-1
  15. Mannion AF, et al. A new skin-surface device for measuring the curvature and global and segmental ranges of motion of the spine: Reliability of measurements and comparison with data reviewed from the literature. Eur Spine J 2004; 13(2): 122-136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-003-0618-8
  16. Kaltenborn FM, et al. The spine: Basic evaluation and mobilization techniques 3th. Orthopedic Physical Therapy 1993; 205-252.
  17. Gallego PH, et al. Indirect influence of specific Kaltenborn glide mobilizations of the carpal joint on a subject with neurological impairments. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2007; 11(4): 275-284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2006.11.004
  18. Lee HH. The effects of Evjenth-Hamberg stretching on range of motion of knee joint and isometric, isokinetic muscle strength. The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Dept. of Physical education 2004.
  19. Neumann DA. Kinesiology of the musculoskeletal system: Foundations for rehabilitation 2th. Mosby 2010; 440-450.
  20. Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically oriented anatomy 4th. Williams and Wilkins 1999; 68-71.
  21. McGuiness J, Vicenzino B, Wright A. Influence of a cervical mobilization technique on respiratory and cardiovascular function. Man Ther, 1997; 2(4): 216-220. https://doi.org/10.1054/math.1997.0302
  22. Bautmans I, et al. Rehabilitation using manual mobilization for thoracic kyphosis in elderly postmenopausal patients with osteoporosis. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42(2): 129-135. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0486
  23. Han JM, Kim HA, Seo KC. Effects of respiratory muscle activity in stroke patients after feedback breathing exercise. J Inte Acad Phys Ther Res 2013, 4(2): 552-556. https://doi.org/10.5854/JIAPTR.2013.10.25.552
  24. Sep KC, Kim HA, Lim SW. Effects of feedback respiratory exercise and diaphragm respiratory exercise on the pulmonary functions of chronic stroke patients. J Inte Acad Phys Ther Res 2012, 3(2): 458-463. https://doi.org/10.5854/JIAPTR.2012.10.30.458