The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Wear of primary teeth caused by opposed all-ceramic or stainless steel crowns

  • Choi, Jae-Won (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Bae, Ik-Hyun (Woorimi Dental Clinic) ;
  • Noh, Tae-Hwan (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Ju, Sung-Won (Dental Research Institute and Department of Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Tae-Kyoung (EZ Plant) ;
  • Ahn, Jin-Soo (Dental Research Institute and Department of Biomaterials Science, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jeong, Tae-Sung (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2015.10.01
  • Accepted : 2015.12.14
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of full-coverage all-ceramic zirconia, lithium disilicate glass-ceramic, leucite glass-ceramic, or stainless steel crowns on antagonistic primary tooth wear. MATERIALS AND METHODS. There were four study groups: the stainless steel (Steel) group, the leucite glass-ceramic (Leucite) group, the lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (Lithium) group, and the monolithic zirconia (Zirconia) group. Ten flat crown specimens were prepared per group; opposing teeth were prepared using primary canines. A wear test was conducted over 100,000 chewing cycles using a dual-axis chewing simulator and a 50 N masticating force, and wear losses of antagonistic teeth and restorative materials were calculated using a three-dimensional profiling system and an electronic scale, respectively. Statistical significance was determined using One-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (P<.05). RESULTS. The Leucite group ($2.670{\pm}1.471mm^3$) showed the greatest amount of antagonist tooth wear, followed by in decreasing order by the Lithium ($2.042{\pm}0.696mm^3$), Zirconia ($1.426{\pm}0.477mm^3$), and Steel groups ($0.397{\pm}0.192mm^3$). Mean volume losses in the Leucite and Lithium groups were significantly greater than in the Steel group (P<.05). No significant difference was observed between mean volume losses in the Zirconia and Steel groups (P>.05). CONCLUSION. Leucite glass-ceramic and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic cause more primary tooth wear than stainless steel or zirconia.

Keywords

References

  1. Humphery WP. Uses of chrome steel in children's dentistry. Dent Surv 1950;26:945-9.
  2. Randall RC. Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:489-500.
  3. MacLean JK, Champagne CE, Waggoner WF, Ditmyer MM, Casamassimo P. Clinical outcomes for primary anterior teeth treated with preveneered stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2007;29:377-81.
  4. Shah PV, Lee JY, Wright JT. Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 2004;26:391-5.
  5. Zimmerman JA, Feigal RJ, Till MJ, Hodges JS. Parental attitudes on restorative materials as factors influencing current use in pediatric dentistry. Pediatr Dent 2009;31:63-70.
  6. Waggoner WF. Restoring primary anterior teeth. Pediatr Dent 2002;24:511-6.
  7. Waggoner WF, Cohen H. Failure strength of four veneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent 1995;17:36-40.
  8. Fuks AB, Ram D, Eidelman E. Clinical performance of esthetic posterior crowns in primary molars: a pilot study. Pediatr Dent 1999;21:445-8.
  9. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M. Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:641-52.
  10. Townsend JA, Knoell P, Yu Q, Zhang JF, Wang Y, Zhu H, Beattie S, Xu X. In vitro fracture resistance of three commercially available zirconia crowns for primary molars. Pediatr Dent 2014;36:125-9.
  11. Seligman DA, Pullinger AG, Solberg WK. The prevalence of dental attrition and its association with factors of age, gender, occlusion, and TMJ symptomatology. J Dent Res 1988; 67:1323-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670101601
  12. Madlena M, Keszthelyi G, Alberth M, Nagy A. The attrition of deciduous teeth. Fogorv Sz 1989;82:273-6.
  13. Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: an ultramicro-indentation study. J Dent 2000;28:589-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(00)00043-9
  14. Mair LH, Stolarski TA, Vowles RW, Lloyd CH. Wear: mechanisms, manifestations and measurement. Report of a workshop. J Dent 1996;24:141-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00043-7
  15. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Occlusal forces in normal-and longface children. J Dent Res 1983;62:571-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345830620051301
  16. Nose K. Study on the hardness of human and animal teeth. Jap J Exp Med 1961;69:1925-45.
  17. Mortimer KV. The relationship of deciduous enamel structure to dental disease. Caries Res 1970;4:206-23. https://doi.org/10.1159/000259643
  18. Nelson GV, Osborne JW, Gale EN, Norman RD, Phillips RW. A three-year clinical evaluation of composite resin and a high copper amalgam in posterior primary teeth. ASDC J Dent Child 1980;47:414-8.
  19. de Gee AJ, van Duinen RN, Werner A, Davidson CL. Early and long-term wear of conventional and resin-modified glass ionomers. J Dent Res 1996;75:1613-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345960750081401
  20. Seghi RR, Rosenstiel SF, Bauer P. Abrasion of human enamel by different dental ceramics in vitro. J Dent Res 1991;70:221-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700031301
  21. Vann WF Jr, Barkmeier WW, Mahler DB. Assessing composite resin wear in primary molars: four-year findings. J Dent Res 1988;67:876-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345880670051601
  22. Villalta P, Rodrigues CR. In vitro occlusal wear of restorative materials on primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005;29:221-4. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.29.3.32681824784r10p4
  23. da Cunha MR, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, Correr-Sobrinho L. In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth. Am J Dent 2006;19:364-9.
  24. Jung YS, Lee JW, Choi YJ, Ahn JS, Shin SW, Huh JB. A study on the in-vitro wear of the natural tooth structure by opposing zirconia or dental porcelain. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:111-5. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.111
  25. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin:an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1141-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006
  26. Ashima G, Sarabjot KB, Gauba K, Mittal HC. Zirconia crowns for rehabilitation of decayed primary incisors: an esthetic alternative. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;39:18-22. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.39.1.t6725r5566u4330g
  27. Planells del Pozo P, Fuks AB. Zirconia crowns--an esthetic and resistant restorative alternative for ECC affected primary teeth. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;38:193-5. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.38.3.0255q84jt2851311
  28. Al-Omiri MK, Harb R, Abu Hammad OA, Lamey PJ, Lynch E, Clifford TJ. Quantification of tooth wear: conventional vs new method using toolmakers microscope and a three-dimensional measuring technique. J Dent 2010;38:560-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.016
  29. Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Two-body wear of different ceramic materials opposed to zirconia ceramic. J Prosthet Dent 2010;104:105-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60102-3
  30. Kim MJ, Oh SH, Kim JH, Ju SW, Seo DG, Jun SH, Ahn JS, Ryu JJ. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains. J Dent 2012;40:979-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.08.004
  31. Amer R, Kurklu D, Kateeb E, Seghi RR. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1151-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.021
  32. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res 1989;68:1752-4. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601
  33. Suzuki S. Simulated enamel wear during occlusal contact. Am J Dent 2004;17:373-7.
  34. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V. Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators-results of a round robin test. Dent Mater 2005;21:304-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.003
  35. Yap AU, Teoh SH, Hastings GW, Lu CS. Comparative wear ranking of dental restorative materials utilizing different wear simulation modes. J Oral Rehabil 1997;24:574-80. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1997.00528.x
  36. Heintze SD, Cavalleri A, Forjanic M, Zellweger G, Rousson V. Wear of ceramic and antagonist-a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro. Dent Mater 2008;24:433-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.06.016
  37. Ghazal M, Yang B, Ludwig K, Kern M. Two-body wear of resin and ceramic denture teeth in comparison to human enamel. Dent Mater 2008;24:502-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.04.012
  38. Hahnel S, Behr M, Handel G, Rosentritt M. Two-body wear of artificial acrylic and composite resin teeth in relation to antagonist material. J Prosthet Dent 2009;101:269-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(09)60051-2
  39. Krejci I, Albert P, Lutz F. The influence of antagonist standardization on wear. J Dent Res 1999;78:713-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345990780021201
  40. Kunzelmann KH, Jelen B, Mehl A, Hickel R. Wear evaluation of MZ100 compared to ceramic CAD/CAM materials. Int J Comput Dent 2001;4:171-84.
  41. Magne P, Oh WS, Pintado MR, DeLong R. Wear of enamel and veneering ceramics after laboratory and chairside finishing procedures. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:669-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70008-9
  42. DeLong R, Douglas WH, Sakaguchi RL, Pintado MR. The wear of dental porcelain in an artificial mouth. Dent Mater 1986;2:214-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(86)80016-1
  43. Vrijhoef MM, Letzel H, Hendriks FH. A method to determine the loss of substance of dental restorations. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:9-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1985.tb00615.x
  44. Oh WS, Delong R, Anusavice KJ. Factors affecting enamel and ceramic wear: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87:451-9. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.123851
  45. White SN, Miklus VG, McLaren EA, Lang LA, Caputo AA. Flexural strength of a layered zirconia and porcelain dental all-ceramic system. J Prosthet Dent 2005;94:125-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.05.007
  46. Ratledge DK, Smith BG, Wilson RF. The effect of restorative materials on the wear of human enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:194-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90080-9
  47. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  48. Suzuki S, Leinfelder KF. Wear of enamel cusps opposed by posterior composite resin. Quintessence Int 1993;24:885-90.
  49. Fischer TE, Anderson MP, Jahanmir S. Influence of fracture toughness on the wear resistance of yttria-doped zirconium oxide. J Am Ceram Soc 1989;72:252-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1989.tb06110.x

Cited by

  1. In Vitro Investigation of Wear of CAD/CAM Polymeric Materials Against Primary Teeth vol.10, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10121410
  2. Mechanical Properties of MgO-Doped Transparent Crystalline Alumina Fabricated by Two-Step Pressureless Sintering vol.922, pp.1662-9752, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.922.116
  3. Artificial Enamel Wear after Prolonged Chewing Simulation against Monolithic Y-TZP Crowns vol.09, pp.04, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4236/msa.2018.94026
  4. Prosthetics in Paediatric Dentistry vol.21, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1515/bjdm-2017-0012
  5. Wear Characteristics of Dental Ceramic CAD/CAM Materials Opposing Various Dental Composite Resins vol.12, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12111839
  6. Monolithic Zirconia: An Update to Current Knowledge. Optical Properties, Wear, and Clinical Performance vol.7, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/dj7030090
  7. Fracture load and chewing simulation of zirconia and stainless‐steel crowns for primary molars vol.127, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12645
  8. Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years vol.2020, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8821068
  9. Suitability of 3D printed pieces of nanocrystalline zirconia for dental applications vol.36, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2020.01.006
  10. CAD/CAM으로 제작한 유전치 지르코니아 전장관의 두께에 따른 파절강도와 반투명도 비교 vol.47, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.5933/jkapd.2020.47.2.205
  11. Tribology, Characterization, and Surface Roughness Study of a CAD/CAM-Fabricated Zirconia vol.6, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40735-020-0327-4
  12. A State-of-the-Art Review on the Wear of the Occlusal Surfaces of Natural Teeth and Prosthetic Crowns vol.13, pp.16, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13163525
  13. Ex Vivo Assessment of Natural Teeth Wear against Zirconia and Novel Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Composite Crowns in Primary Teeth by a Three-Dimensional Assessment Method vol.2021, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/9670982
  14. Evaluation and comparison two types of prefabricated zirconia crowns in mixed and primary dentition: A randomized clinical trial vol.7, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06240
  15. Management of Amelogenesis Imperfecta in Childhood: Two Case Reports vol.18, pp.13, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137204
  16. Can zirconia crowns be the first restorative choice after endodontic treatment of primary teeth? vol.75, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcp.14888
  17. Effect of surface treatment and glazing in the two-body wear resistance of a hybrid ceramic after polymeric staining application vol.35, pp.23, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2021.1892427
  18. Zirconia crowns for children: A systematic review vol.32, pp.1, 2022, https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12793