DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on the Characteristic of Partiality in Korean Traditional Residential Architecture in view of the Phenomenology

현상학 측면에서 본 한국 전통주거건축의 부분성에 관한 연구

  • Yook, Ok-Soo (Dept. of Interior Design, Seoul Institute of Arts)
  • 육옥수 (서울 예술대학교 실내디자인과)
  • Received : 2016.08.26
  • Accepted : 2016.10.24
  • Published : 2016.10.25

Abstract

Focused on developing form of Western architecture, invisible elements covering actual human life has been dealt with separately and the time was turned away and disparaged. But now the phenomenology, arranging such a meeting of space and time, gives opportunity to look at the actual life in architecture. Recently, Guille Deleuze and Merleau-Ponty tried to recover the sense of touch segregated in skin from body keeping eyes for distance. And the activity can be happened by being connected to the body rather than to eye in the space. From the phase of recognition where the human body tries to identify the object in the space considering a time, it will be changed for the subject to the phase of space-time structure. If the tactility is to erase the distance different from the visuality in dichotomy, it will be occurred to having a tension and makes new relationship to work trying to move the subjective point of view in object. Like this evidence in analysis of architecture, it can be found these in the Korean traditional architecture rather than Western architecture in terms of emphasizing the time and space. And this study will be intensive to the side of the Phenomenology how it is being connected to the movement in the space and time for the subject and object.

Keywords

References

  1. Bonta, J. P. (1979). An anatomy of architectural interpretation: A semiotic review of the criticism of Mies van der Rohe's Barcelona Pavilion. Barcelona: Gustavo Gili.
  2. Choi, J. S. (2009). Zur untersuchung der phäno- menologie merleau-Pontys und husserls im hinblick auf den begriff des leibes [To investigate the phenomenology of Merleau- Ponty and Husserl with regard to the concept of the body]. Korean Society for Phenomenology, 40, 15-29.
  3. Descartes, R. (1953). Les principes de la Philosopie [The principle of philosophy]. Paris: Gallimard.
  4. Doo, H. S. (1996). Hegel's aesthetics III. Seoul: Na Nam.
  5. Frampton, K. (1995). Studies in the tectonic culture and modern architecture. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  6. Hays, M. (2000). Architecture theory since 1968. Cambridge: The MIT press
  7. Jo, S. K., & Lee, B. W. (2005). A study on the collage’s concept represented in Mies’ architecture. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 16(4), 45-55.
  8. Jung, J. W., & Ko, S. L. (1986). Space in architecture. Seoul: Gi moon-dang.
  9. Jung, S. C. (2004). Modernity and the hegemony of vision. Seoul: Vision and Language.
  10. Kim, C. I. (1997). Arts and visual perception. Seoul: Kylin- Won.
  11. Kim. D. L. (2009). Walter benjamin. Seoul: Seokwang Publishing.
  12. Kim, S. H. (2012). The philosophy and human imagination. Seoul: MoonHak & Jisung Publishing.
  13. Kim, W. G. (2009). The movement of space and time. Seoul: Spacetime.
  14. Lee, E. S. (2009). Our spirit. Seoul: An Graphics.
  15. Lee, J. W. (1986). The philosophy of space and time. Seoul: SeoKwang Publishing.
  16. Lee, J. W. (1999). Life, death, destiny. Seoul: Geo Reom.
  17. Lee, J. W. (2000). Folding and defolding. Seoul: Geo Reom.
  18. Lee, N. I. (2013). The phenomenology of perception. Seoul: Han gil Publishing.
  19. Lim, H. G. (2001). The Phenomenology of husserl. Seoul: Cheongye Publishing.
  20. Lim, H. H. (1984). Study on the efficient layout of newspapers advertisement, Unpublished master's thesis, Jungang University, Seoul, Korea.
  21. Lyu, Y. G. (2008). The Phenomenology of perception. Seoul: MoonHak & Jisung Publishing.
  22. N.J. Habraken and Others (1976). Variation: Systematic design of supports. Cambridge: MIT.
  23. Park, J. S. (2007). Art et experience esthetique chez merleau-ponty [Art and aesthetic experience in merleauponty]. Korea Philosophy Society, 104, 137-160.
  24. Park, Y. W. (2009). Philo-architecture. Seoul: Hyangyun.
  25. Schmarsow, A. (1894). Das wesen der archi- tektonische. In Mallgrave, H. (Trans.), Empathy, form and space. problems in german aesthetics. L.A.: The Getty Center.
  26. Shin, S. M., & Kim, J. L. (2010). Reading body and movement. Seoul: Ewha University.
  27. Tafuri, M. (1987). Architecture and utopia. Cambridge: the MIT Press.
  28. Yook, O. S. (2014). Study on the space in works of mies van der rohe in terms of text. Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 25(6), 101-109. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2014.25.6.101