DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessing weediness of herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean

  • Ko, Eun Mi (Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology) ;
  • Kim, Do Young (Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology) ;
  • Kim, Hye Jin (Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology) ;
  • Chung, Young Soo (Department of Genetic Engineering, Dong-A University) ;
  • Kim, Chang-Gi (Bio-Evaluation Center, Korea Research Institute of Bioscience & Biotechnology)
  • Received : 2016.09.20
  • Accepted : 2016.10.18
  • Published : 2016.12.31

Abstract

Imports of genetically modified (GM) soybeans (Glycine max) for food or feed consumption in Korea have been increasing. Although the cultivation of GM soybeans has not yet been allowed in Korea, the number of field tests for GM soybeans has also been rising. This study was conducted to investigate whether herbicide tolerant GM soybean can survive and persist in uncultivated environments when they escape from transportation routes or from isolated fields. Seeds of GM and non-GM soybeans and wild soybeans (Glycine soja) were buried in 2 and 15 cm soil depths and their viability was examined after 1, 2, 6, and 10 months. GM and non-GM soybean seeds completely lost their viability within six months of burial, whereas seeds of wild soybean maintained their viability during the study period. Seeds of soybean and wild soybeans that were sown on the soil surface germinated and grew to vegetative cotyledon stage. Seedlings of GM and non-GM soybean did not compete well with weeds, including Cerastium glomeratum, Alopecurus aequalis var. amurensis, Capsella bursa-pastoris, Conyza canadensis, Stellaria aquatica, and Erigeron annuus. Also, GM soybean did not survive through winter. However, wild soybeans competed well with the weeds and became dominant in August. Herbicide tolerant GM soybean is unlikely to persist under uncultivated environments and to become weeds.

Keywords

References

  1. Crawley MJ, Brown SL, Hails RS, Kohn DD, Rees M. 2001. Transgenic crops in natural habitats. Nature 409:682-683. https://doi.org/10.1038/35055621
  2. Eastick RJ, Hearnden, MN. 2006. Potential for weediness of Bt cotton in northern Australia. Weed Science 54:1142-1151. https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-06-077R.1
  3. Han SM, Kim YT, Won OJ, Choi KH, Rho YH, Park KW. 2016. The importation of genetically modified crops and its environmental impacts in Korea. Korean Journal of Agricultural Science 43:215-220. https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20160024
  4. Hancock D, Park KW, Mallory-Smith CA. 2015. Seed longevity of glyphosate resistant transgenic creeping bentgrass. Journal of Ecology and Environment 38:437-442. https://doi.org/10.5141/ecoenv.2015.046
  5. ISTA (The International Seed Testing Association). 2010. International Rules for Seed Testing Edition 2010. The International Seed Testing Association (ISTA), Bassersdorf.
  6. Kim CG, Kim DY, Moon YS, Kim HJ, Kim DI, Chun YJ, Park KW, Jeong SC, Kim SY, Kim HM. 2010a. Persistence of genetically modified potatoes in the field. Journal of Plant Biology 53:395-399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-010-9128-5
  7. Kim HJ, Kim MJ, Park JH, Im HH, Lee DH, Kim KH, Lee JH, Kim DH, Choi HK, Jung HW, Chung YS. 2016. RNAi-mediated Soybean mosaic virus (SMV) resistance of a Korean soybean cultivar. Plant Biotechnology Reports 10:257-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-016-0402-y
  8. Kim JS, Choi JS, Cho MA, Chung YS, Lee JH, Lee KJ, Kim HJ, Jeon EH, Kim MJ. 2010b. Antibiotics marker free soybean having resistance against two herbicides. Korean Patent 10-0994443-0000.
  9. Korea Biosafety Clearing House. 2016. Status of Imports of Living Modified Organisms in Korea. Accessed in http://www.biosafety.or.kr/sub/info.do?m=030202&s=kbch.
  10. Lee HS, Yi GH, Park JS, Seo SC, Sohn JK, Kim KM. 2011. Analysis of the weediness potential in Vitamin A enforced rice. Korean Journal of Weed Science 31:160-166. https://doi.org/10.5660/KJWS.2011.31.2.160
  11. Lee IY, Park JE, Moon BC, Suh SC, Shin KS, Woo MO, Kweon SJ. 2009. Possibility of gene flow and unintended escape from leaf-folder (Cnaphalocrocis medinalis) resistant rice. Korean Journal of Weed Science 29:46-55.
  12. Nam KH, Kim DY, Pack IS, Park JH, Seo JS, Choi YD, Cheong JJ, Kim CH, Kim CG. 2016. Comparative analysis of chemical compositions between non-transgenic soybean seeds and those from plants over-expressing AtJMT, the gene for jasmonic acid carboxyl methyltransferase. Food Chemistry 196:236-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.046
  13. OECD. 2000. Consensus Document on the Biology of Glycine max (L.) Merr. (Soybean). OECD, Paris.
  14. Seo JS, Sohn HB, Noh K, Jung C, An JH, Donovan CM, Somers DA, Kim DI, Jeong SC, Kim CG, Kim HM, Lee SH, Choi YD, Moon TW, Kim CH, Cheong JJ. 2012. Expression of the Arabidopsis AtMYB44 gene confers drought/salt-stress tolerance in transgenic soybean. Molecular Breeding 29:601-608. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-011-9576-8
  15. Wright D, Lenssen AW. 2013. Staging soybean development. Agriculture and Environment Extension Publications, 191.

Cited by

  1. Characteristics of cultural practice and weed community in adzuki bean fields in the south-west districts of Korea vol.44, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170005
  2. A study on the establishment of isolation distances for environmental release of biotech crops vol.44, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170018