DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Contents analysis of the community dental hygiene practice outcome evaluation

지역사회치위생학 현장(보건소)실습 성과평가 내용분석

  • Lee, Ga-Yeong (Department of Dental Hygiene, The Graduate School, Yonsei University) ;
  • Han, Yang-Keum (Department of Dental Hygiene, Daejeon Health Science College) ;
  • Kim, Young-Kyung (Department of Dental Hygiene, Chungcheong University) ;
  • Lim, Hyun-Ju (Department of Dental Hygiene, DongJu College) ;
  • Kown, Yang-Ok (Public Health Center, Sasang-gu, Busan, Public Health Center) ;
  • Kim, Han-Mi (Hoengseong-gun, Gangwon-do, Public Health Center) ;
  • Park, Jeong-Ran (Department of Dental Hygiene, Baek seok University) ;
  • Kim, Nam-Hee (Department of Dental Hygiene, Wonju College of Medicine, Yonsei University)
  • 이가영 (연세대학교 대학원 치위생학과) ;
  • 한양금 (대전보건대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 김영경 (충청대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 임현주 (동주대학교 치위생과) ;
  • 권양옥 (부산시 사상구 보건소) ;
  • 김한미 (강원도 횡성군 보건소) ;
  • 박정란 (백석대학교 치위생학과) ;
  • 김남희 (연세대학교 원주의과대학 치위생학과)
  • Received : 2015.08.24
  • Accepted : 2016.01.25
  • Published : 2016.02.28

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of the study is to evaluate the contents analysis of the community dental hygiene practice in the dental hygiene students and suggest the outcome based evaluation index of community dental hygiene practice. This study will provide the basic data for the community nursing and social welfare practice. Methods: A self-reported questionnaire was completed by 82 dental hygiene professors and 254 dental hygienists in community health centers after receiving informed consent based on institutional review board from 5th Dec 2014 to 30th Jul 2015. A total of 49 professors and 134 dental hygienists gave the complete answers. The study instrument was adapted from the literature review. The questionnaire consisted of evaluation, purpose of evaluation, and evaluation format. Data were analyzed using SPSS 20.0 program. The contents analysis was carried out through input, process, output, and outcome. Results: The practice outcome evaluation was conducted in 62.9% of the dental hygiene departments and 32.9% of the community health centers. Most of the dental hygiene professors chose "To know what students learned(27.3%)" and "To ensure student's role and behavior in practice(27.3%)." as the purpose of evaluation. The public dental hygienists chose "To score the practice grade(42.1%)." The evaluation method was done anonymously. Conclusions: The outcome based evaluation in community dental hygiene practice was the best method to evaluate the practice education for the competency of the dental hygiene students.

Keywords

References

  1. Winslow CEA. The untilled fields of public health. Science 1920; 51(1306): 23-33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.51.1306.23
  2. Last JM, Association IE. A dictionary of epidemiology. 3rd ed. Ottawa: Oxford Univ Press; 2001: 2-4.
  3. SJ Lee. Development of an application and expansion plan of manpower for effective activities of public health organization. Chengwon: Korean Health Industry Development Institute; 2007: 23-5.
  4. Ministry of Health & Welfare, Korea Human Resource Development Institute for Health and Welfare. 2015 Community integrated health promotion program presentation. Osong: Korea Human Resource Development Institute for Health and Welfare; 2014: 15-8.
  5. Kim HY, Lee SK, Park YD. Conditions and performance of public health dentists for public oral health activities. J Korean Acad Dent Health 2008; 32(1): 86-95.
  6. Kim NH, Han YK, Kim YK, Lim HJ, Kown YO, Kim HM, et al. Development of practice objective in community dental health. Seoul: Korean Dental Hygienists association.Korean association of Dental hygiene Professors; 2014: 2-26.
  7. Kwon HJ. Study on the practicum outcome of undergraduate social work students[Doctoral dissertation]. Seoul: Univ. of Seoul womens, 2004.
  8. Kim YJ, Han YK, Kim YK, Lim HJ, Kim HM, Park JR. Current education status of the community dental hygiene practice. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2015; 15(1): 137-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2015.15.01.137.
  9. Park MJ. Analysis of the characteristics of competence-based curriculum and its critical issues. J Curriculum Stud 2009; 27(4): 71-94. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.27.4.200912.004
  10. Harden RM. AMEE Guide No. 14: Outcome-based education: Part 1-an introduction to outcome-based education Medical teacher. 1999; 21(1): 7-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979969
  11. Boitel C. Development of a scale to measure learning in field education[Doctoral dissertation]. Cleveland, OH: Univ. of Case Western Reserve, 2002.
  12. SS Bae. Public health program planning. 2nd ed. Seoul: Gyechugmunhawsa; 2004: 374-94.
  13. CY Lee, HY Lee, GW Kim, KY Kang. Current status of community health nursing practicum in bachelor program in korea. J Korean Acad Community Health Nurs 2006; 17(1): 26-37.
  14. Korea Association of Social Workers. Current and manual of social welfare practicum. Seoul: Ministry of Health & Welfare; 2010: 136-83.
  15. Kim NH, Han YK, Kim YK, Lim HJ, Kown YO, Kim HM, et al. Actual job performance of the community dental hygienist. Seoul: Korean Dental Hygienists Association; 2014: 95-115.
  16. Jang MH, Kim JH. Influencing factors on attitude, stress and satisfaction in clinical practice. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014; 14(3): 407-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.13065/ jksdh.2014.14.03.407.
  17. Kim NH, Han YK, Kim YK, Lim HJ, Kown YO, Kim HM, et al. Development of practice outcome evaluation in the community dental hygiene. Seoul: Korean Dental Hygienists association.Korean association of Dental hygiene Professors; 2015: 52-3.

Cited by

  1. 미래 보건치과위생사에게 기대하는 인성과 그 진출전망에 대한 전국 보건치과위생사 대표단의 심층면담 vol.16, pp.6, 2016, https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2016.16.06.969