Journal of the Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회지)

The Korean Operations Research and Management Science Society (한국경영과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of the Change in R&D Efficiency in a Government-Funded Research Institute in Korea : Cumulative DEA/Malmquist Analysis Approach

Cumulative DEA/Malmquist Index 기법을 이용한 정부출연 연구기관 연구개발 효율성 변화 분석

  • Lee, Suchul (Dept. of Future R&D Strategy, Div. of Policy Research, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI)) ;
  • Lee, Dong Ho (The 7th R&D Institute Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Systems PMO, Agency for Defense Development (ADD))
  • 이수철 (한국과학기술정보연구원 미래정책연구부 미래전략실) ;
  • 이동호 (국방과학연구소 제7기술연구본부 UAV체계개발단)
  • Received : 2015.06.09
  • Accepted : 2015.12.10
  • Published : 2016.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper presents a framework to analyze the change in the research and development (R&D) efficiency of government-funded research institutes (GRIs) in Korea. Cumulative data envelopment analysis/Malmquist index method is utilized to analyze the changes in R&D efficiency of GRIs. Data analysis of the R&D activities of 10 GRIs in Korea Research Council of Fundamental Science & Technology showed that the average R&D efficiency of the 10 GRIs improved from 2009 to 2013. However, the efficiency of a few GRIs decreased in terms of the catch-up index. The proposed framework can help management teams diagnose the current state of R&D activities and determine the efficacy of strategic actions by comparing efficiencies in the past.

Keywords

References

  1. 곽기호, 오승훈, 김재윤, "DEA-AR을 활용한 산업기술연구회 소속 정부출연(연)의 R&D 효율성 분석과 평가 방안 제언", 한국기술혁신학회 2010년 추계학술대회, (2010), pp.262-278.
  2. 권철신, 박준호, 홍석기, "상호영향형 R&D 과제군의 평가선정을 위한 CIDEAR 모형의 개발", 한국경영과학회지, 제29권, 제3호(2004), pp.41-61.
  3. 김승태 외, 과학기술분야 정부출연연구기관 투자 및 성과 분석과 시사점 KISTEP, 2012.
  4. 김지혜, 김해수, 임빛나, 윤장혁, "DEA와 맘퀴스트 생산성 지수를 활용한 OECD 국가간 의료서비스 효율성 분석", 한국경영과학회지, 제37권, 제4호(2012), pp.125-138. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2012.37.4.125
  5. 남영호, 김병태, "과학기술계 출연연구기관 기관 평가지표의 BSC 관점분석", 기술혁신연구, 제13권, 제1호(2005), pp.265-293.
  6. 남인석, 송윤영, 정병호, "DEA 모형을 이용한 정부출연연구기관의 상대적 효율성 분석", Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 제31권, 제1(2008), pp.1-10.
  7. 민철구, 박성욱, "정부출연 연구기관 연구성과에 영향을 미치는 요인 분석", 기술혁신연구, 제21권, 제3호(2013), pp.121-141. https://doi.org/10.14383/SIME.2013.21.3.005
  8. 심우중, 김은실, "우리나라 국가연구개발사업 정부연구비의 투입 대비 성과의 다각적 분석", 한국기술혁신학회지, 제13권, 제1호(2010), pp.1-27.
  9. 이수철, 서의호, 이재영, "정부출연연구기관 경쟁력 분석 모형 개발", 지역산업연구, 제36권, 제2호(2013), pp.159-176.
  10. 이종욱, "정부의 연구비 지원이 연구자의 연구성과에 미친 영향 분석", 한국기술혁신학회지, 제14권, 제4(2011), pp.915-936.
  11. 임호순, 유석천, 김연성, "연구개발사업의 평가 및 선정을 위한 DEA/AHP 통합모형에 관한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 제24권, 제4(1999), pp.1-12.
  12. 장덕희, 강길모, 한동성, "지식재산(특허) 생산에 대한 정부연구비 지원의 영향 분석 : 우리나라 이공계 전공분야 대학교수들의 연구활동 결과를 중심으로", 한국정책학회 추계학술발표논문집, 2013.
  13. 최문정 외, 정부출연 연구기관 성과평가의 발전방안 및 성과제고를 위한 방안 도출 KISTEP, 2010.
  14. 한승환, 권기석, "대학의 특성 및 연구비 구조와 산학 성과와의 관계 : 우리나라 대학의 이공계 분야를 중심으로", 한국행정학보, 제43권, 제3호(2009), pp.307-325.
  15. Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper, "Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis," Management Science, Vol.30, No. 9(1984), pp.1078-1092. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
  16. Bound, J., C. Cumins, Z. Griliches, H.H. Hall, and A. Jaffe, R&D, Patent, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1984.
  17. Charnes, A., W.W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, "Measuring the Efficiency of Decision Making Units," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.2, No.6(1978), pp.429-444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
  18. Chen, C.-T., C.-F. Chien, M.-H. Lin, and J.-T. Wang, "Using DEA to evaluate R&D performance of the computers and peripherals firms in Taiwan," International Journal of Business, Vol.9, No.4(2004), pp.347-359.
  19. Cullmann, A., J. Schmidt-Ehmcke, and P. Zloczysti, "R&D efficiency and barriers to entry : A two stage semi-parametric DEA approach," Oxford Economic Papers, Vol.64, No.1(2011), pp.176-196. https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpr015
  20. Eilat, H., B. Golany, and A. Shtub, "R&D project evaluation : An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach," Omega, Vol.36, No.5(2008), pp.895-912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.002
  21. Fare, R., S. Grosskopf, M. Norris, and Z. Zhang, "Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries," The American Economic Review, Vol.84, No.1(1994), pp.66-83.
  22. Georghiou, L., "Socio-economic effects of collaborative R&D-European experiences," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Vol.24, No.1(1999), pp.69-79. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007724804288
  23. Graves, S.B. and N.S. Langowitz, "R&D productivity : A global multi-industry comparison," Technology Forecasting and Social Change, Vol.53, No.2(1996), pp.125-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(96)00068-6
  24. Hashimoto, A. and S. Haneda, "Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry," Research Policy, Vol.37, No.10(2008, pp.1829-1836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.08.004
  25. Hsu, F.-M. and C.-C. Hsueh, "Measuring relative efficiency of government-sponsored R&D projects : A three-stage approach," Evaluation and Program Planning, Vol.32, No.2(2009, pp.178-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2008.10.005
  26. Lee, H., Y. Park, and H. Choi, "Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives : A DEA approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Vol.196, No.3(2009), pp.847-855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.016
  27. Lee, H.Y. and Y.T. Park, "An international comparison of R&D efficiency : DEA approach," Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, Vol.13, No.2(2005), pp.207-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2005.9668614
  28. Liu, J.S. and W.-M. Lu, "DEA and ranking with the network-based approach : a case of R&D performance," Omega, Vol.38, No.6(2010), pp.453-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.002
  29. Madden, G.G. and S.J. Savage, "Telecommunications productivity, catch-up and innovation," Telecommunications Policy, Vol.23(1999), pp.65-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961(98)00076-7
  30. Meng, W., D. Zhang, L. Qi, and W. Liu, "Twolevel DEA approaches in research evaluation," Omega, Vol.36, No.6(2008), pp. 950-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2007.12.005
  31. Scherer, F.M., "The propensity to patent," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol.1, No.1(1983), pp.107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-7187(83)90026-7
  32. Taskin, F. and O. Zaim, "Catching-up and innovation in high-and low-income countries," Economics Letters, Vol.54, No.1(1997), pp.93-100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(97)00004-9
  33. Thomas, V.J., S.K. Jain, and S. Sharma, "Analyzing R&D efficiency in Asia and the OECD : An application of the Malmquist productivity index," Science and Innovation Policy, 2009 Atlanta Conference on. IEEE, 2009.
  34. Thomas, V.J., S. Sharma, and S.K. Jain, "Using patents and publications to assess R&D efficiency in the states of the USA," World Patent Information, Vol.33, No.1(2011), pp.4-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wpi.2010.01.005
  35. Wang, E.C. and W. Huang, "Relative efficiency of R&D activities : A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach," Research Policy, Vol. 36, No.2(2007), pp.260-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.11.004
  36. Zhong, W., W. Yuan, S.X. Li, and Z. Huang, "The performance evaluation of regional R&D investments in China : An application of DEA based on the first official China economic census data," Omega, Vol.39, No.4(2011), pp.447-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2010.09.004