Journal of the Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons

The Korean Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons (대한구강악안면외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative study on the osseointegration of implants in dog mandibles according to the implant surface treatment

  • Yoon, Wook-Jae (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Kim, Su-Gwan (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Oh, Ji-Su (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • You, Jae-Seek (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Chosun University) ;
  • Jeong, Kyung-In (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Section of Dentistry, Konyang University Hospital) ;
  • Lim, Sung-Chul (Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Chosun University) ;
  • Jeong, Mi-Ae (Department of Dental Hygiene, Kangwon National University)
  • Received : 2015.11.02
  • Accepted : 2016.02.26
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the impact of implant surface treatment on the stability and osseointegration of implants in dog mandibles. Materials and Methods: Six adult dogs received a total of 48 implants that were prepared using four different surface treatments; resorbable blast media (RBM), hydroxyapatite (HA), hydrothermal-treated HA, and sand blasting and acid etching (SLA). Implants were installed, and dogs were separated into 2- and 4-week groups. Implant stability was evaluated via Periotest M, Osstell Mentor, and removal torque analyzers. A histomorphometric analysis was also performed. Results: The stability evaluation showed that all groups generally had satisfactory values. The histomorphometric evaluation via a light microscope revealed that the HA surface implant group had the highest ratio of new bone formation on the entire fixture. The hydrothermal-treated HA surface implant group showed a high ratio of bone-to-implant contact in the upper half of the implant area. Conclusion: The hydrothermal-treated HA implant improved the bone-to-implant contact ratio on the upper fixture, which increased the implant stability.

Keywords

References

  1. Mueller CK, Thorwarth M, Schmidt M, Schlegel KA, Schultze-Mosgau S. Comparative analysis of osseointegration of titanium implants with acid-etched surfaces and different biomolecular coatings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2011;112:726-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.01.004
  2. Abuhussein H, Pagni G, Rebaudi A, Wang HL. The effect of thread pattern upon implant osseointegration. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:129-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01800.x
  3. de Vicente JC, Recio O, Martin-Villa L, Junquera LM, Lopez-Arranz JS. Histomorphometric evaluation of guided bone regeneration around implants with SLA surface: an experimental study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;35:1047-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2006.06.008
  4. Albrektsson T, Brånemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseointegrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a longlasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand 1981;52:155-70. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453678108991776
  5. Brånemark PI, Adell R, Breine U, Hansson BO, Lindstrom J, Ohlsson A. Intra-osseous anchorage of dental prostheses. I. Experimental studies. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1969;3:81-100. https://doi.org/10.3109/02844316909036699
  6. Shalabi MM, Gortemaker A, Van't Hof MA, Jansen JA, Creugers NH. Implant surface roughness and bone healing: a systematic review. J Dent Res 2006;85:496-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910608500603
  7. Thompson JI, Gregson PJ, Revell PA. Analysis of push-out test data based on interfacial fracture energy. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1999;10:863-8. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008929201918
  8. Buser D, Schenk RK, Steinemann S, Fiorellini JP, Fox CH, Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1991;25:889-902. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820250708
  9. Le Guehennec L, Soueidan A, Layrolle P, Amouriq Y. Surface treatments of titanium dental implants for rapid osseointegration. Dent Mater 2007;23:844-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.025
  10. Buser D, Broggini N, Wieland M, Schenk RK, Denzer AJ, Cochran DL, et al. Enhanced bone apposition to a chemically modified SLA titanium surface. J Dent Res 2004;83:529-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408300704
  11. Ellingsen JE, Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmen A. Improved retention and bone-tolmplant contact with fluoride-modified titanium implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:659-66.
  12. Jeong R, Marin C, Granato R, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Granjeiro JM, et al. Early bone healing around implant surfaces treated with variations in the resorbable blasting media method. A study in rabbits. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15:e119-25.
  13. Meredith N, Book K, Friberg B, Jemt T, Sennerby L. Resonance frequency measurements of implant stability in vivo. A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of resonance frequency measurements on implants in the edentulous and partially dentate maxilla. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997;8:226-33. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080309.x
  14. Ratner BD, Porter SC. Surfaces in biology and biomaterials: description and characterization. In: Brash JL, Wojciechowski PW, eds. Interfacial phenomena and bioproducts. New York: Marcel Dekker; 1996:57-83.
  15. Davies JE. Understanding peri-implant endosseous healing. J Dent Educ 2003;67:932-49.
  16. Schwarz ML, Kowarsch M, Rose S, Becker K, Lenz T, Jani L. Effect of surface roughness, porosity, and a resorbable calcium phosphate coating on osseointegration of titanium in a minipig model. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;89:667-78.
  17. Olive J, Aparicio C. Periotest method as a measure of osseointegrated oral implant stability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5: 390-400.
  18. Coelho PG, Granjeiro JM, Romanos GE, Suzuki M, Silva NR, Cardaropoli G, et al. Basic research methods and current trends of dental implant surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;88:579-96.
  19. Piattelli M, Scarano A, Paolantonio M, Iezzi G, Petrone G, Piattelli A. Bone response to machined and resorbable blast material titanium implants: an experimental study in rabbits. J Oral Implantol 2002;28:2-8. https://doi.org/10.1563/1548-1336(2002)028<0002:BRTMAR>2.3.CO;2
  20. Granato R, Marin C, Suzuki M, Gil JN, Janal MN, Coelho PG. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of a thin ion beam bioceramic deposition on plateau root form implants: an experimental study in dogs. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;90:396-403.
  21. Yang GL, He FM, Yang XF, Wang XX, Zhao SF. Bone responses to titanium implants surface-roughened by sandblasted and double etched treatments in a rabbit model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106:516-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.03.017
  22. Cochran DL, Schenk RK, Lussi A, Higginbottom FL, Buser D. Bone response to unloaded and loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface: a histometric study in the canine mandible. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;40:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO;2-Q
  23. Block MS, Kent JN, Kay JF. Evaluation of hydroxylapatite-coated titanium dental implants in dogs. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1987;45:601-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2391(87)90270-9
  24. Jones JD, Lupori J, Van Sickels JE, Gardner W. A 5-year comparison of hydroxyapatite-coated titanium plasma-sprayed and titanium plasma-sprayed cylinder dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1999;87:649-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1079-2104(99)70154-X
  25. Cook SD, Baffes GC, Palafox AJ, Wolfe MW, Burgess A. Torsional stability of HA-coated and grit-blasted titanium dental implants. J Oral Implantol 1992;18:354-65.
  26. Radin SR, Ducheyne P. Plasma spraying induced changes of calcium phosphate ceramic characteristics and the effect on in vitro stability. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1992;3:33-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00702942
  27. Yang GL, He FM, Hu JA, Wang XX, Zhao SF. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:782-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2008.12.023
  28. Ishizawa H, Ogino M. Characterization of thin hydroxyapatite layers formed on anodic titanium oxide films containing Ca and P by hydrothermal treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1995;29:1071-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820290907
  29. Braceras I, Alava JI, Goikoetxea L, de Maeztu MA, Onate JI. Interaction of engineered surfaces with the living world: ion implantation vs. osseointegration. Surf Coat Technol 2007;201:8091-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.052
  30. Yang B, Uchida M, Kim HM, Zhang X, Kokubo T. Preparation of bioactive titanium metal via anodic oxidation treatment. Biomaterials 2004;25:1003-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00626-4
  31. De Maeztu MA, Braceras I, Alava JI, Gay-Escoda C. Improvement of osseointegration of titanium dental implant surfaces modified with CO ions: a comparative histomorphometric study in beagle dogs. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2008;37:441-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2008.01.010

Cited by

  1. Long-term evaluation of the prognosis of straight and tapered implant with resorbable blast media surface: Retrospective clinical study vol.43, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.21851/obr.43.01.201903.23
  2. The Role of Etching Surface Treatment of Ti6Al4V Alloys on Hydroxyapatite Coating on Substrate Surfaces by Electrophoretic Coating Method vol.988, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.988.200
  3. Influence of Three Dental Implant Surfaces on Cell Viability and Bone Behavior. An In Vitro and a Histometric Study in a Rabbit Model vol.10, pp.14, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/app10144790
  4. Effects of fluid shear stress on expression of focal adhesion kinase in MG-63 human osteoblast-like cells on different surface modification of titanium vol.12, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/21655979.2021.1962686
  5. Histologic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of a New Bioactive Liquid BBL on Implant Surface: A Preclinical Study in Foxhound Dogs vol.14, pp.20, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14206217