East Asian Economic Review

Korea Institute for International Economic Policy (대외경제정책연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Trade Facilitation Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Discriminatory or Non-discriminatory?

  • Park, Innwon (Division of International Studies, Korea University) ;
  • Park, Soonchan (Department of Economics and International Trade, Kongju National University)
  • Received : 2016.09.17
  • Accepted : 2016.11.28
  • Published : 2016.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The RTAs with trade facilitation provisions have been expected to generate a larger net trade-creating effect and complement the discriminatory feature of RTAs but have yet to be empirically proven. Recognizing the limitations of existing studies, we conducted a quantitative analysis on the effects of RTAs with and without trade facilitation provisions on both intra- and extra-bloc trade by using a modified gravity equation. We applied the Poisson Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood (PPML) estimation with time varying exporter and importer fixed effect method to panel data consisting of 45,770 country pairs covering 170 countries for 2000-2010. We found that the trade facilitation provisions in existing RTAs are non-discriminatory by generating more intra- and extra-bloc trade in general. In particular, we found that the trade effects of RTAs in the APEC region are much stronger than the general case covering all RTAs in the world. In addition, as we control the trade effect of a country's trade facilitation, which is ranked by the World Bank's logistic performance index, RTAs consisting of trade facilitation provisions are discriminatory for trade in final goods and non-discriminatory for trade in intermediate goods. Overall, we endeavor to "explain," instead of "hypothesizing," why most of the recent RTAs contain trade facilitation provisions, especially in light of the deepening regional interdependence through trade in parts and components under global value chains and support the necessity of multilateralizing RTAs by implementing non-discriminatory trade facilitation provisions.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, J. E. and E. van Wincoop. 2003. "Gravity with Gravitas: A Solution to the Border Puzzle," American Economic Review, vol. 93, no 1, pp. 170-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321455214
  2. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). 2002. "Measuring the Impact of APEC Trade Facilitation on APEC Economies: A CGE Analysis," Chapter 2 in Benefits of Trade and Investment Liberalization and Facilitation. APEC Economic Committee.
  3. Arndt, S. W. 2001. "Production Networks in an Economically Integrated Region," ASEAN Economic Bulletin, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1355/AE18-1C
  4. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2002. On the Endogeneity of International Trade Flows and Free Trade Agreements. Unpublished manuscript.
  5. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2004. "Economic Determinants of Free Trade Agreements," Journal of International Economics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 29-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(03)00079-5
  6. Baier, S. L. and J. H. Bergstrand. 2007. "Do Free Trade Agreements Actually Increase Members' International Trade?," Journal of International Economics, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 72-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005
  7. Baldwin, R. 2014. "Multilateralising 21st Century Regionalism," Global Forum on Trade Reconciling Regionalism and Multilateralism in a Post-Bali World. Paris: OECD Conference Centre.
  8. Baldwin, R. and P. Low. (eds.) 2009. Multilateralizing Regionalism: Challenges for the Global Trade System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Deardorff, A. V. 2001. "International Provision of Trade Services, Trade, and Fragmentation," Review of International Economics, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9396.00276
  10. Dennis, A. 2006. The Impact of Regional Trade Agreements and Trade Facilitation in the Middle East and North Africa Region. World Bank Policy Research Paper, no. 3837.
  11. Dennis, A. 2010. "Global Economic Crisis and Trade: The Role of Trade Facilitation," Applied Economics Letters, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 1753-1757. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850903409771
  12. Felipe, J. and U. Kumar. 2010. The Role of Trade Facilitation in Central Asia: A Gravity Model. Working Paper, no. 628. New York: Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
  13. Hamanaka, S., Tafgar., A. and D. Lazaro. 2010. Trade Facilitation Measures Under Free Trade Agreements: Are They Discriminatory Against Non-Members? ADB Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration, no. 55.
  14. Kim, S. and I. Park. 2005. "Trade Facilitation and A Northeast Asian Free Trade Arrangement," International Area Studies Review, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1177/223386590500800103
  15. Kim, S., Park I. and S. Park. 2013. "A Free Trade Area of the Asia Pacific (FTAAP): Is It Desirable?" Journal of East Asian Economic Integration, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3-25. https://doi.org/10.11644/KIEP.JEAI.2013.17.1.257
  16. Lejarraga, I. 2014. Deep Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: How Multilateral-friendly? An Overview of OECD Findings. OECD Trade Policy Papers, no. 168.
  17. Magee, C. 2003. "Endogenous Preferential Trade Agreements: An Empirical Analysis," B.E. Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1-19.
  18. Maur, J. C. 2008. Regionalism and Trade Facilitation: A Primer. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4464.
  19. Neufeld, N. 2014. Trade Facilitation Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements: Traits and Trends. Staff Working Paper ERSD-2014-01. Geneva: Economic Research and Statistics Division, World Trade Organization.
  20. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2002. The Relationship between Regional Trade Agreements and Multilateral Trading System: Trade Facilitation. TD/TC/WP(2002)17/FINAL, Working Party of the Trade Committee, OECD.
  21. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). 2003. Quantitative Assessment of the Benefits of Trade Facilitation. TD/TC/WP(2003)31/FINAL, Working Party of the Trade Committee, OECD.
  22. Otsuki, T. 2011. Quantifying the Benefits of Trade Facilitation in ASEAN. OSIPP Discussion Paper: DP-2011-E-006. Osaka: The Osaka School of International Public Policy, Osaka University.
  23. Santos Silva, J. M. C. and S. Tenreyo. 2006. "The Log of Gravity," Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 641-658. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.88.4.641
  24. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). 2011. Trade Facilitation in Regional Trade Agreements. New York and Geneva: United Nations.
  25. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2007. "Trade Facilitation Beyond the Multilateral Trade Negotiations: Regional Practices, Customs Valuation and Other Emerging Issues," A study by the Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade.
  26. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). 2011. Trade Facilitation in Regional Trade Agreements: Recent Trends in Asia and the Pacific. Staff Working Paper, 02/11, Trade and Investment Division, UNESCAP.
  27. Wilson, J. S., Mann, C. L. and T. Otsuki. 2004. Assessing the Potential Benefit of Trade Facilitation: A Global Perspective. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, WPS 3224.
  28. Yadav, N. 2014. "Impact of Trade Facilitation on Parts and Components Trade," International Trade Journal, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 287-310. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2014.922040
  29. Yasui, T. 2014. Trade Facilitation in Regional Trade Agreements. WCO Research Paper, no. 30. World Customs Organization.