The Korean Journal of Pain

The Korean Pain Society (대한통증학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Intramuscular Electrical Stimulation Using Inversely Placed Electrodes on Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Shoulder - A Case Series

  • Shanmugam, Sukumar (Department of Neuro-Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy) ;
  • Mathias, Lawrence (Department of Orthopaedics, K. S. Hegde Medical Academy) ;
  • Thakur, Ajay (Department of Orthopaedic-Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy) ;
  • Kumar, Dhanesh (Department of Orthopaedic-Physiotherapy, Nitte Institute of Physiotherapy)
  • Received : 2015.11.27
  • Accepted : 2016.02.11
  • Published : 2016.04.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is one of the common musculoskeletal conditions of the shoulder which may develop sensory-motor and autonomic dysfunctions at the various level of the neuromuscular system. The pain and dysfunction caused by MPS were primarily treated with physical therapy and pharmacological agents in order to achieve painfree movements. However, in recent years intramuscular electrical stimulation (IMES) with conventional electrode placement was used by researchers to maximise therapeutic values. But, in this study an inverse electrode placement was used to deliver electrical impulses intramuscularly to achieve neuro-modulation at the various level of the nervous system. Nine patients with MPS were treated with intramuscular electrode stimulation using inversely placed electrodes for a period of three weeks. All nine subjects recovered from their shoulder pain and disability within the few weeks of intervention. So, this inverse electrode placement may be more appropriate for chronic pain management.

Keywords

References

  1. Simons DG, Travell JG, Simons LS. Myofascial pain and dysfunction: the trigger point manual. Baltimore; MD, Williams & Wilkins. 1999.
  2. Bron C, Dommerholt J, Stegenga B, Wensing M, Oostendorp RA. High prevalence of shoulder girdle muscles with myofascial trigger points in patients with shoulder pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 139. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-12-139
  3. Gerwin RD. Classification, epidemiology, and natural history of myofascial pain syndrome. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2001; 5: 412-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-001-0052-8
  4. Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Dommerholt J. Myofascial trigger points: peripheral or central phenomenon? Curr Rheumatol Rep 2014; 16: 395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11926-013-0395-2
  5. Dommerholt J, del Moral OM, Grobli C. Trigger point dry needling. J Man Manip Ther 2006; 14: E70-87. https://doi.org/10.1179/jmt.2006.14.4.70E
  6. Chu J, Schwartz I. Etoims twitch relief method in chronic refractory myofascial pain (CRMP). Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol 2008; 48: 311-20.
  7. Gondin J, Cozzone PJ, Bendahan D. Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes? Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 2473-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2101-2
  8. Szecsi J, Fornusek C, Krause P, Straube A. Low-frequency rectangular pulse is superior to middle frequency alternating current stimulation in cycling of people with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007; 88: 338-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.026
  9. Lee SH, Chen CC, Lee CS, Lin TC, Chan RC. Effects of needle electrical intramuscular stimulation on shoulder and cervical myofascial pain syndrome and microcirculation. J Chin Med Assoc 2008; 71: 200-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1726-4901(08)70104-7
  10. Rainey CE. The use of trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation for a subject with chronic low back pain: a case report. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013; 8: 145-61.
  11. Lucas KR, Polus BI, Rich PA. Latent myofascial trigger points: their effects on muscle activation and movement efficiency. J Bodywork Movement Ther 2004; 8: 160-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbmt.2003.12.002
  12. Shah JP, Danoff JV, Desai MJ, Parikh S, Nakamura LY, Phillips TM, et al. Biochemicals associated with pain and inflammation are elevated in sites near to and remote from active myofascial trigger points. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008; 89: 16-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2007.10.018
  13. Ga H, Choi JH, Park CH, Yoon HJ. Dry needling of trigger points with and without paraspinal needling in myofascial pain syndromes in elderly patients. J Altern Complement Med 2007; 13: 617-24. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.6371
  14. Shanmugam S, Shetty K, Mathias L. Dry needling effects on non- specific cervical radiculopathic pain and dysfunction: a case report. Int J Ther Rehabil Res 2015; 4: 21-5.
  15. Rock JM, Rainey CE. Treatment of nonspecific thoracic spine pain with trigger point dry needling and intramuscular electrical stimulation: a case series. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014; 9: 699-711.

Cited by

  1. Inverse Electrode Placement May Help to Improve Electrotherapeutic Effects in the Field of Chronic Pain Management vol.29, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3344/kjp.2016.29.3.202
  2. Acupuncture for chronic pain vol.30, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000000501