DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Process Capability Index for Multiple Measurements

다측정 공정능력지수의 특성분석

  • Lee, Do-Kyung (School of Industrial Engineering, Kumoh National Institute of Technology)
  • 이도경 (금오공과대학교 산업공학부)
  • Received : 2016.02.19
  • Accepted : 2016.03.10
  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

This study is concerned about the process capability index in single process. Previous process capability indices have been developed for the consistency with the nonconforming rate due to the process target value and skewness. These indices calculate the process capability by measuring one spot in an item. But the only one datum in an item reduces the representativeness of the item. In addition to the lack of representativeness, there are many cases that the uniformity of the item such as flatness of panel is absolutely important. In these cases, we have to measure several spots in an item. Also the nonconforming judgment to an item is mainly due to the range not due to the standard variation or the shift from the specifications. To imply the uniformity concept to the process capability index, we should consider only the variation in an item. It is the within subgroup variation. When the universe is composed of several subgroups, the sample standard deviation is the sum of the within subgroup variation and the between subgroup variation. So the range R which represents only the within subgroup variation is the much better measure than that of the sample standard deviation. In general, a subgroup contains a couple of individual items. But in our cases, a subgroup is an item and R is the difference between the maximum and the minimum among the measured data in an item. Even though our object is a single process index, causing by the subgroups, its analytic structure looks like a system process capability index. In this paper we propose a new process capability index considering the representativeness and uniformity.

Keywords

References

  1. Baik, J.W. and Jo, J., Criticism and Guideline for the Use of Process Capability Index, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 1999, Vol. 27, No. 2, pp. 81-100.
  2. Benson, E.D., Statistical Properties of a System of Fourth-Generation Process Capability Indices Cpsk(u, v, w), [Dissertation], Univ. of Maryland, 1994.
  3. Boyles, R.A., The Taguchi Capability Index, Journal of Quality Technology, 1991, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1991.11979279
  4. Chan, L.K., Cheng, S.W., and Spring, F.A., A New Measure of Process Capability, Journal of Quality Technology, 1988, Vol. 20, pp. 162-175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1988.11979102
  5. Chang, Y.S., Heuristic Process Capability Indices Using Distribution-decomposition Methods, Journal of the Korean Society for Quality Management, 2013, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 233-248. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2013.41.2.233
  6. Cho, N.H. and Lee, Y.H., A New Multivariate System Process Capability Index (SCpsk), Korea Safety Management and Science, 2003, Vol. 5, No 3, pp. 145-156.
  7. Juran, J.M., Quality Control Handbook, 3rd Ed., Mcgraw-hill, New York, 1974.
  8. Kane, V.E., Process Capability Indices, Journal of Quality Technology, 1986, Vol. 18, No 1, pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1986.11978984
  9. Kenney, J.F. and Keeping E.S., The Distribution in Mathematics of Statistics, 2nd ed., Princeton, NJ : Van Nostrand, 1951, pp. 170-173.
  10. Kotz, S. and Johnson, N.L., Process Capability Indices-A Review 1999-2000, Journal of Quality Technology, 2002, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 2-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.2002.11980119
  11. Kotz, S. and Lovelace, C.R., Introduction to Process Capability Indices, Arnold, London, U.K., 1998.
  12. Lee, D.K., A new Mulivariate Process Capability Index, KNUT Research Journal, 1999, Vol. 20, pp. 153-160.
  13. Lee, D.K. and Lee, H.S., Process capability index for single process with multiple measurement location, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2007, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 28-36.
  14. Lee, D.K., A Study on Expression of Process Capability and Sigma Level, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2009, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 111-116.
  15. Lee, D.K., The Process Capability Index of Minimum Base on the Multiple Measuring Locations, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2011, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 114-119.
  16. Lee, D.K., Issues on the Calculation of the Process Capability Index, Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering, 2014, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 127-132. https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2014.37.1.127
  17. Palmer, K. and Tsui, K.L., A Review and Interpretations of Process Capability Indices, Annals of Operation Research, 1999, Vol. 87, pp. 31-47. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018993221702
  18. Patnaic, P.B., The Use of Mean Range as an Estimator of Variance in Statistical Test, Biometrica, 1950, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/37.1-2.78
  19. Pearn, W.L., Kotz S., and Johnson, N.L., Distributional and Inferential Properties of Process Capability Indices, Journal of Quality Technology, 1992, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 216-231. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1992.11979403
  20. Plante, R.D., Process Capability : A Criterion for Optimizing Multiple Response Product and Process Design, IIE Transactions, 2001, Vol. 33, pp. 497-509.
  21. Pyzedek, T., Why normal distributions aren't- All that normal, Quality Engineering, 1995, Vol. 7, pp. 769-777. https://doi.org/10.1080/08982119508918823
  22. Quesenberry, C.P., The Effect of Sample Size on Estimated Limits for and X bar control Charts, Journal of Quality Technology, 1993, Vol. 25, pp. 237-247. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224065.1993.11979470
  23. Shiau, J.J., Yen, C.L., Pearn, W.L., and Lee, W.T., Yield-Related Process Capability Indices for Processes of Multiple Quality Characteristics, Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2013, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 487-507. https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.1397

Cited by

  1. 손실함수를 적용한 공정평균 이동에 대한 조정시기 결정 vol.40, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.11627/jkise.2017.40.1.165