DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Testing of risk perception survey - Diabetes mellitus in Korea

당뇨병 위험 지각 측정 도구의 타당성 평가

  • Received : 2016.02.04
  • Accepted : 2016.03.07
  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

This study was to evaluate of the reliability and validity of the Risk Perception Survey - Diabetes Mellitus (RPS-DM) with Korean diabetes patients. A total of 183 patients participated in this study from December 4, 2014 to January 1, 2015 with self-reported questionnaires. The data was analyzed using exploratory factor analysis, cronbach's alpha, and item to total correlation. The factor structure of the instrument showed the cumulative variance of 45.1% in the factor analysis and a four-factor structure was found to be appropriate. The comparative site risk score matched with the RPS-DM in English except item 7, 8, and 12. The RPS-DM in Korean version has been found to be reliable and valid.

본 연구의 목적은 한국의 제2형 성인 당뇨병 환자를 대상으로 당뇨병 위험 지각 측정 도구 (RPS-DM)의 신뢰도와 타당도를 평가하기 위하여 시도되었다. 당뇨병 위험 지각 측정 도구는 번역 과정을 통해 내용타당도를 확보한 후 서울 지역 상급 종합병원 내분비내과 외래를 이용하고 있는 성인 183명을 대상으로 자기입식 설문조사로 방식을 이용하여 자료 수집을 진행하였다. 자료 분석은 탐색적 요인분석과 문항 간 상관계수, 검사 재검사 신뢰도 검사를 수행하였다. 내용 타당도 검증 결과를 보면 당뇨병 위험 측정 도구는 '위험 지식'을 제외하면 '지각된 통제 (3문항)', '낙관적 편견 (2문항)', '환경적 위험 (9문항)', '질병 위험 (9문항)'의 4가지 하부 구성요인으로 확인되었으며, 4가지 요인으로 전체 분산의 45.1%를 설명하고 있었다. 원 도구에서 제시된 '걱정'은 위험 지각 측정 도구의 하부 구성 영역에서 제외하였다. 당뇨병 위험 측정 도구는 한국인의 당뇨병 위험 지각 수준을 측정할 수 있는 타당성있고 신뢰성이 있는 도구임을 제언한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research, Guilford Press, New York.
  2. Butler, G. and Mathews, A. (1987). Anticipatory anxiety and risk perception. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 11, 551-565. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01183858
  3. Calvin, D., Quinn, L., Dancy, B., Park, C., Fleming, S. G., Smith, E. and Fogelfeld, L. (2011). African Americans' perception of risk for diabetes complications. The Diabetes Educator, 37, 689-698. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721711416258
  4. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Current status and need for a Korean diabetes prevention study, available from http://www.cdc.go.kr/.
  5. Constans, J. I. (2001). Worry propensity and the perception of risk. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 39, 721-729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(00)00037-1
  6. Eiser, J. R. (1988). Communication and interpretation of risk. British Medical Bulletin, 54, 779-90.
  7. Ferketich, S. (1991). Focus on psychometrics, aspects of item analysis. Research in Nursing Health, 14, 165-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770140211
  8. Fischetti, N. (2015). Correlates among perceived risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus, physical activity, and dietary intake in adolescents. Pediatric Nursing, 41, 126-131.
  9. Guess, N. D., Caengprasath, N., Dornhorst, A. and Frost, G. S. (2015). Adherence to NICE guidelines on diabetes prevention in the UK: Effect on patient knowledge and perceived risk. Primary Care Diabetes, 9, 407-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2015.04.005
  10. Hivert, M., Warner, A. S., Shrader, P., Grant, R. W. and Meigs, J. B. (2009). Diabetes risk perception and Intention to adopt healthy lifestyles among primary care patients. Diabetes Care, 32, 1820-1822. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc09-0720
  11. International Diabetes Foundation (2014). Diabetes atlas, 7th ed., available from http://www.diabetesatlas.org/resources/2015-atlas.html.
  12. Janz, N. K. and Becker, M. H. (1984). The health belief model: A decade later. Health Education Quarterly, 11, 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019818401100101
  13. Jin, M. H. and Lee, J. Y. (2013). The study on risk factors for diagnosis for metabolic syndrome and odds ratio using multi factor dimensionality reduction method. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 24, 867- 876. https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2013.24.4.867
  14. Kim, K. W., Lee, C. H. and Choi, B. (2013). A research for forecasting of rate of university quota according to the reducing of young generation. Journal of the Korean Data & Information Science Society, 26, 1175-1188.
  15. Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2014). Achieved January 10, from https://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes.
  16. Korean Statistical Information Service. (2015). Achieved January 10, from http://www.index.go.kr/potal.
  17. Rogers, R. W. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. The Journal of Psychology, 91, 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1975.9915803
  18. Shreck, E., Gonzalez, J. S., Cohen, H. W. and Walker, E. A. (2014). Risk perception and self-management in urban, diverse adults with type 2 diabetes: The improving diabetes outcomes study. International Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 88-98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-013-9291-4
  19. Sjoberg, L., Moen, B. E. and Rundmo, T. (2004) Explaining risk perception an evaluation of the psychometric paradigm, Rotunde Publikasjoner, Trondheim.
  20. Sjoberg, L. (1998). Worry and risk perception. Risk analysis, 18, 85-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1998.tb00918.x
  21. Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236, 280-285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
  22. Soltanipour, S., Heidarzadeh, A. and Jafarinezhad, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Persian (Farsi) version of the risk perception survey-diabetes mellitus. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 20, 190-195. https://doi.org/10.26719/2014.20.3.190
  23. McCaul, K. D., Branstetter, A. D., Schroeder, D. M. and Glasglow, R. E.(1996). What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review. Health Psychology, 15, 423-429. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.15.6.423
  24. Mokkink, L., Terwee, C., Knol, D., Stratford, P., Alonso, J., Patrick, D., Bouter, L. and de Vet, H. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22
  25. Rimal, R. N. and Real, K. (2003). Perceived risk and efficacy beliefs as motivators of change. Human Communication Research, 29,370-399.
  26. Tak, J. K. (2007). Psychological testing: An understanding of development and evaluation method, 2nd ed., Hakjisa Publisher, Seoul.
  27. United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998). Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. British Medical Journal, 317, 703-713. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7160.703
  28. Walker, E. A., Mertz, C. K., Kalten, M. R. and Flynn, J. (2003). Risk perception for developing diabetes: Comparative risk judgments of physicians. Diabetes Care, 26, 2543-2548. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.26.9.2543
  29. Walker, E. A., Caban. A., Schechter, C. B., Basch, C. E., Blanco, E., DeWitt, T. and Mojica, G. (2007). Measuring comparative risk perceptions in an urban minority population: The risk perception survey for diabetes. Diabetes Educator, 33, 103-110. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145721706298198
  30. Waltz, C., Strickland, O. L. and Lenz, E. (2010). Measurement in Nursing and Health Research, 4th ed., Springer Publishing Company, New York.
  31. Wells, A. and Morrison, A. P. (1994). Qualititive dimensions of normal worry and normal obsessions : A comparative study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32, 867-870. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90167-8
  32. Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended Parallel Model. Communication Mongraphs, 59, 225-240.
  33. Weinstein, N. D., Kwitel, A., McCau,l K D, Magnan, R. E., Gerrard, M. and Gibbons, F. X. (2007). Risk perceptions: Assessment and relationship to influenza vaccination. Health Psychology, 26, 146-151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.146

Cited by

  1. 건강행위 이행율에 따른 대사증후군 발생 위험요인 변화 vol.28, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2017.28.3.559
  2. 한국 성인의 당화혈색소에 영향을 미치는 요인 vol.29, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7465/jkdi.2018.29.4.1013