Journal of Ginseng Research

The Korean Society of Ginseng (고려인삼학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Diversity, distribution, and antagonistic activities of rhizobacteria of Panax notoginseng

  • Fan, Ze-Yan (School of Energy and Environment Science, Yunnan Normal University) ;
  • Miao, Cui-Ping (Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education and Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University) ;
  • Qiao, Xin-Guo (Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education and Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University) ;
  • Zheng, You-Kun (Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education and Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University) ;
  • Chen, Hua-Hong (Department of Chemistry and Life Science, Chuxiong Normal University) ;
  • Chen, You-Wei (Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education and Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University) ;
  • Xu, Li-Hua (Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education and Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University) ;
  • Zhao, Li-Xing (Key Laboratory of Microbial Diversity in Southwest China of Ministry of Education and Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Bio-Resources, Yunnan Institute of Microbiology, Yunnan University) ;
  • Guan, Hui-Lin (School of Energy and Environment Science, Yunnan Normal University)
  • Received : 2015.02.09
  • Accepted : 2015.05.02
  • Published : 2016.04.15
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Rhizobacteria play an important role in plant defense and could be promising sources of biocontrol agents. This study aimed to screen antagonistic bacteria and develop a biocontrol system for root rot complex of Panax notoginseng. Methods: Pure-culture methods were used to isolate bacteria from the rhizosphere soil of notoginseng plants. The identification of isolates was based on the analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequences. Results: A total of 279 bacteria were obtained from rhizosphere soils of healthy and root-rot notoginseng plants, and uncultivated soil. Among all the isolates, 88 showed antagonistic activity to at least one of three phytopathogenic fungi, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium solani, and Phoma herbarum mainly causing root rot disease of P. notoginseng. Based on the 16S rRNA sequencing, the antagonistic bacteria were characterized into four clusters, Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, and Bacteroidetesi. The genus Bacillus was the most frequently isolated, and Bacillus siamensis (Hs02), Bacillus atrophaeus (Hs09) showed strong antagonistic activity to the three pathogens. The distribution pattern differed in soil types, genera Achromobacter, Acidovorax, Brevibacterium, Brevundimonas, Flavimonas, and Streptomyces were only found in rhizosphere of healthy plants, while Delftia, Leclercia, Brevibacillus, Microbacterium, Pantoea, Rhizobium, and Stenotrophomonas only exist in soil of diseased plant, and Acinetobacter only exist in uncultivated soil. Conclusion: The results suggest that diverse bacteria exist in the P. notoginseng rhizosphere soil, with differences in community in the same field, and antagonistic isolates may be good potential biological control agent for the notoginseng root-rot diseases caused by F. oxysporum, Fusarium solani, and Panax herbarum.

Keywords

References

  1. Park HJ, Kim DH, Park SJ, Kim JM, Ryu JH. Ginseng in traditional herbal prescriptions. J Ginseng Res 2012;36:225-41. https://doi.org/10.5142/jgr.2012.36.3.225
  2. Kim JH. Cardiovascular diseases and Panax ginseng: a review on molecular mechanisms and medical applications. J Ginseng Res 2012;36:16-26. https://doi.org/10.5142/jgr.2012.36.1.16
  3. Dong TT, Cui XM, Song ZH, Zhao KJ, Ji ZN, Lo CK, Tsim KW. Chemical assessment of roots of P. notoginseng in China: regional and seasonal variations in its active constituents. J Agric Food Chem 2003;51:4617-23. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf034229k
  4. Wei JX, Du YC. Modern science research and application of P. notoginseng. Kunming: Yunnan Science and Technology Press; 1996.
  5. Guo HB, Cui XM, An N, Cai GP. Sanchi ginseng (P. notoginseng (Burkill) F. H. Chen) in China: distribution, cultivation and variations. Genet Resour Crop Evol 2006;57:453-60.
  6. Chen YJ, Wang YY, Feng GQ, Li ZY. Relationship between root rot of P. notoginseng and ecological conditions. Yunnan Agric Sci Technol 2001;6:33-5.
  7. Wang CL, Cui XM, Li ZY, He CF, Yu SF, Luo WF. Studies on relationship between root rot on P. notoginseng (Burk). F. H. Chen and its environmental conditions. Chin J Chin Materia Medica 1998;23:714-6.
  8. Kim JH, Jeon YH, Park H, Lee BD, Cho DH, Park BY, Khan Z, Kim YH. The root lesion nematode, Pratylenchus subpenetrans, on ginseng (Panax ginseng) in Korea. Nematology 2006;8:637-9. https://doi.org/10.1163/156854106778613949
  9. Lee SK. Fusarium species associated with ginseng (Panax ginseng) and their role in the root-rot of ginseng plants. Res Plant Dis 2004;10:248-59. https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2004.10.4.248
  10. Lee JH, Yu YH, Kim YH, Ohh SH, Park WM. Morphological characteristics and pathogenicity of Alternaria isolates causing leaf and stem blights and black root rot of Korea ginseng. Korea J Plant Pathol 1990;6:13-20.
  11. Jeon YH, Park H, Lee BD, Yu YH, Chang SP, Kim SG, Hwang I, Kim YH. First description of crown gall disease on ginseng. Plant Pathol J 2008;24:207-10. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2008.24.2.207
  12. Ohh SH, Lee SK, Lee JH, Han SC. New root rot disease of Panax ginseng due to Ditylenchus destructor Thorne. Korea J Plant Prot 1983;22:181-5.
  13. Ohh SH, Yu YH, Cho DH, Lee JH, Kim YH. Effect of chemical treatments on population changes of Ditylenchus destructor and responses of Panax ginseng. Korea J Plant Prot 1986;25:169-73.
  14. Yu YH, Ohh SH. Research on ginseng diseases in Korea. Korea J Ginseng Sci 1993;17:61-8.
  15. Ma L, Cao YH, Cheng MH, Huang Y, Mo MH, Wang Y, Yang JZ, Yang FX. Phylogenetic diversity of bacterial endophytes of P. notoginseng with antagonistic characteristics towards pathogens of root-rot disease complex. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2013;103:299-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-012-9810-3
  16. Miao ZQ, Li SD, Liu XZ, Chen YJ, Li YH, Wang Y, Xia ZY, Zhang KQ. The causal microorganisms of P. notoginseng root rot disease. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 2006;39:1371-8.
  17. Handelsman J, Stabb EV. Biocontrol of soil borne plant pathogens. Plant Cell 1996;8:1855-69. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.8.10.1855
  18. Ma CZ, Li SD, Gu ZR, Chen YJ, Zhou W, Wang Y, Liu YZ, Xia ZY, Li YH. Measures of integrated control of root rot complex of continuous cropping P. notoginseng and their control efficacy. Acta Agriculture Shanghai 2006;22:63-8.
  19. Flint ML, Dreistadt SH, Clark JK. Natural Enemies Handbook: the illustrated guide to biological pest control. Oakland: University of California Press; 1998.
  20. Hameeda B, Rupela OP, Reddy G. Antagonistic activity of bacteria inhabiting composts against soil-borne plant pathogenic fungi. Indian J Microbiol 2006;46:389-96.
  21. Berg G, Opelt J, Zachow C, Lottmann J, Gotz M, Costa R, Smalla K. The rhizosphere effect on bacteria antagonistic towards the pathogenic fungus Verticillium differs depending on plant species and site. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 2006;56:250-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2005.00025.x
  22. Patkowska E, Konopinski M. Antagonistic activity of selected bacteria occurring in the soil after root chicory cultivation. Plant Soil Environ 2014;60:320-4. https://doi.org/10.17221/283/2014-PSE
  23. Landa BB, Hervas A, Bettiol W, Jimenez-Diaz RM. Antagonistic activity of bacteria from the chickpea rhizosphere against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Ciceris. Phytoparasitica 1997;25:305-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02981094
  24. Raaijmakers JM, Paulitz TC, Steinberg C, Alabouvette C, Yvan ML. The rhizosphere: a playground and battlefield for soilborne pathogens and beneficial microorganisms. Plant Soil 2009;321:341-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-008-9568-6
  25. Whipps JM. Ecological considerations involved in commercial development of biological control agents for soil-borne diseases. In: JD van Elsas, Trevors JT, Wellington EMH, editors. Modern Soil Microbiology. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc; 1997. p. 525-46.
  26. Huang Y, Ma L, Fang DH, Xi JQ, Zhu ML, Mo MH, Zhang KQ, Jie YP. Isolation and characterisation of rhizosphere bacteria active against Meloidogyne incognita, Phytophthora nicotianae and the root knot-black shank complex in tobacco. Pest Manag Sci 2015;71:415-22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.3820
  27. Adam M, Heuer H, Hallmann J. Bacterial antagonists of fungal pathogens also control root-knot nematodes by induced systemic resistance of tomato plants. PLoS One 2014;9:e90402. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090402
  28. Haas D, Defago G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 2005;3:307-19. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1129
  29. Essghaier B, Fardeau ML, Cayol JL, Hajlaoui MR, Boudabous A, Jijakli H, Sadfi- Zouaoui N. Biological control of grey mould in strawberry fruits by halophilic bacteria. J Appl Microbiol 2009;106:833-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.04053.x
  30. Qin S, Li J, Chen HH, Zhao GZ, Zhu WY, Jiang CL, Xu LH, Li WJ. Isolation, diversity, and antimicrobial activity of rare actinobacteria from medicinal plants of tropical rain forests in Xishuangbanna, China. Appl Environ Microbiol 2009;75:6176-86. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01034-09
  31. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, Lipman DJ. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:3389-402. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
  32. Maidak BL, Olsen GJ, Larsen N, Overbeek R, Mc-Caughey MJ, Woese CR. The RDP (ribosomal database project). Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:109-10. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/25.1.109
  33. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgens DG. The Clustal X windows interface, flexible strategies for multiple sequences alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;24:4876-82.
  34. Kimura M. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 1980;16:111-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01731581
  35. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA 5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 2011;28:2731-9. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
  36. Garbeva P, van Veen JA, van Elsas JD. Microbial diversity in soil: selection of microbial populations by plant and soil type and implications for disease suppressiveness. Annu Rev Phytopathol 2004;42:243-70. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.42.012604.135455
  37. Atkinson A, Watson CA. The beneficial rhizosphere: a dynamic entity. Appl Soil Ecol 2000;48:99-104.
  38. Kent AD, Triplett EW. Microbial communities and their interactions in soil andrhizosphere ecosystems. Annu Rev Microbiol 2002;56:211-36. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.161120
  39. Song JY, Seo MW, Kim SI, Nam MH, Lim HS, Kim HG. Genetic diversity andpathogenicity of Cylindrocarpon destructans isolates obtained from KoreanPanax ginseng. Mycobiology 2014;42:174-80. https://doi.org/10.5941/MYCO.2014.42.2.174
  40. Rahman M, Punja ZK. Biological control of damping-off on American ginseng(Panax quinquefolius) by Clonostachys rosea f. catenulate (= Gliocladium catenulatum). Can J Plant Pathol 2007;29:203-7. https://doi.org/10.1080/07060660709507458
  41. Ryu H, Park H, Suh DS, Jung GH, Park J, Lee BD. Biological control of Colletotrichumpanacicola on Panax ginseng by Bacillus subtilis HK-CSM-1. J GinsengRes 2014;38:215-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2014.05.001
  42. Song M, Yun HY, Kim YH. Antagonistic Bacillus species as a biological controlof ginseng root rot caused by Fusarium cf. incarnatum. J Ginseng Res 2014;38:136-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jgr.2013.11.016
  43. Guo R, Liu X, Li S, Miao Z. In vitro inhibition of fungal root-rot pathogens ofPanax notoginseng by rhizobacteria. Plant Pathol J 2009;25:70-6. https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.2009.25.1.070

Cited by

  1. New and bioactive natural products from an endophyte of Panax notoginseng vol.7, pp.60, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra07060h
  2. Diversity and composition of rhizospheric soil and root endogenous bacteria in Panax notoginseng during continuous cropping practices vol.57, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/jobm.201600464
  3. Evaluation of multifarious plant growth promoting traits, antagonistic potential and phylogenetic affiliation of rhizobacteria associated with commercial tea plants grown in Darjeeling, India vol.12, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182302
  4. A multi-criteria approach for the selection of efficient biocontrol agents against Botrytis cinerea on tomato in Algeria vol.63, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-017-9851-7
  5. Purple corn‐associated rhizobacteria with potential for plant growth promotion vol.124, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.13708
  6. Biological control of boxwood blight by Pseudomonas protegens recovered from recycling irrigation systems vol.124, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.01.014
  7. Single-Class Data Descriptors for Mapping Panax notoginseng through P-Learning vol.8, pp.9, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/app8091448
  8. A methyl jasmonate induced defensin like protein from Panax notoginseng confers resistance against Fusarium solani in transgenic tobacco vol.63, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.32615/bp.2019.123
  9. Isolation and identification of a Bacillus subtilis HZ-72 exhibiting biocontrol activity against flax seedling blight vol.153, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10658-018-1595-4
  10. High-Sensitivity Determination of Nutrient Elements in Panax notoginseng by Laser-induced Breakdown Spectroscopy and Chemometric Methods vol.24, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24081525
  11. Molecular Identification and Evaluation of Indigenous Bacterial Isolates for Their Plant Growth Promoting and Biological Control Activities against Fusarium Wilt Pathogen of Tomato vol.35, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.5423/ppj.oa.06.2018.0104
  12. Components of rhizospheric bacterial communities of barley and their potential for plant growth promotion and biocontrol of Fusarium wilt of watermelon vol.50, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42770-019-00089-z
  13. Isolation and Characterization of New Phenazine Metabolites with Antifungal Activity against Root-Rot Pathogens of Panax notoginseng from Streptomyces vol.67, pp.41, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.9b04191
  14. Chromium-reducing and phosphate-solubilizing Achromobacter xylosoxidans bacteria from the heavy metal-contaminated soil of the Brass city, Moradabad, India vol.16, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-019-02300-y
  15. A transcriptome analysis uncovers Panax notoginseng resistance to Fusarium solani induced by methyl jasmonate vol.41, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-019-00865-z
  16. Antagonistic Potential of Endophytic Bacteria Against Phytophthora palmivora Causing Black Pod Rot Disease on Cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) In Indonesia vol.19, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3923/ppj.2020.22.41
  17. First report of Plectosphaerella plurivora causing root rot disease in Panax notoginseng in China vol.168, pp.7, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12901
  18. Identification and in silico molecular modelling study of newly isolated Bacillus subtilis SI-18 strain against S9 protein of Rhizoctonia solani vol.13, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2020.09.044
  19. Evaluation of plant growth promotion properties and induction of antioxidative defense mechanism by tea rhizobacteria of Darjeeling, India vol.10, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-72439-z
  20. Myrothins A–F from Endophytic Fungus Myrothecium sp. BS‐31 Harbored in Panax notoginseng vol.18, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1002/cbdv.202000964
  21. Impact of rhizosphere microorganisms on arsenic (As) transformation and accumulation in a traditional Chinese medical plant vol.28, pp.43, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14500-6
  22. The role of a β-1,3-1,4-glucanase derived from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FS6 in the protection of ginseng against Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria panax vol.164, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2021.104765