DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Millimetric Shifts in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy on the Radiation Dose Distribution

  • Published : 2016.04.11

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to facilitate decision-making in cases of breast cancer radiotherapy shifts by simulating millimetric shifts and analyzing their effects on dose distribution. Methods: The study included 30 patients with left side breast cancer who were treated with three dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) in the Radiation Oncology Department in Hatay Public Hospital, between January 2013 and April 2015. A treatment plan shifting at three axes with six different measures was simulated. Results: The biggest difference in values was (+3mm shift) 476cGy, with a 7.7 % change for heart and 25.6% for spinal cord. The shifts in values respectively for CTV min, mean, max were -4.8%, 2.5%, 4%. The differences for lymphatic min, mean, max were 21.3%, 20.3%, -12.2%. Conclusion: The most important thing is not the treatment plan quality, but its practicality. The treatment plan must be practical and its practice must be controlled rigidly.

Keywords

References

  1. Bentzen SM, Constine LS, Deasy JO, et al (2010). Quantitative Analyses of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC): An Introduction to the Scientific Issues. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys, 1, 76.
  2. Carter CL1, Allen C, Henson DE (1989). Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. CANCER, 163, 181-7.
  3. Ferlay J, Hery C, Autier P, et al (2010). Global Burden of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Epidemiology, Eds Christopher I.Li. Springer Science Business Media, LLC, 1-19.
  4. Gentile MS, Usman AA, Neuschler EI, et al (2015). Contouring Guidelines for the Axillary Lymph Nodes for the Delivery of Radiation Therapy in Breast Cancer: Evaluation of the RTOG Breast Cancer Atlas. Int J Rad Onc Biol Phys, 93, 257-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.07.002
  5. Redpath AT, Muren LP (2006). CT-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for bladder cancer: Isocenter shifts, margins and their impact on target dose. Rad Onc, 81, 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2006.10.017
  6. Wigg DR, Morgan GW (2001). Radiation oncology in Australia: Workforce, workloads and equipment 1986-1999. Australasian Rad, 45, 146-69. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1673.2001.00897.x