DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Type of Culture Media on B6D2F1 Mice Oogenesis

배양액 종류가 B6D2F1 마우스 배아발생능력에 미치는 영향

  • 유창석 (대구대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 박기상 (대구대학교 동물자원학과) ;
  • 서병부 (대구대학교 동물자원학과)
  • Received : 2016.02.05
  • Accepted : 2016.03.20
  • Published : 2016.03.31

Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the effects of type of culture media (BM, G2, OS, TCM, and MEM) on B6D2F1 mice oogenesis. In the present study, B6D2F1/CrljOri $F_1$ mice were utilized in order to maximize oogenesis. Also we used TCM-199, Dulbecco's medified Eagle's medium (DMEM), embryo culture medium (Fertilization medium, Cleavage medium, Blastocyst medium), G series medium and One step medium. In vitro maturation was highest in BM followed by the order of OS, MEM, TCM and G2 ($90{\pm}2.8%>88{\pm}3.2%>85{\pm}4.9%>78{\pm}10.2%>64{\pm}7.7%$, respectively). To note, the G2 group was statistically different compared to other groups (p<0.05). On the other hand the fertilization rate was highest in the G2 group followed by BM, OS, TCM, and MEM ($87{\pm}7.2%>85{\pm}6.9%>74{\pm}14.0%>71{\pm}13.8%>2{\pm}1.4%$, respectively). The MEM group was significantly lower compared to other groups (p<0.05). The developmental rate was highest in the OS group followed by the G2 group and the BM group albeit no statistical significance was noted ($73{\pm}11.6%>71{\pm}9.2%>66{\pm}10.4%$). Of note, all cells of the TCM and MEM groups were died during embryonic development. The zona hatched rate ($51{\pm}9.8%$ vs. $50{\pm}9.1%$ vs. $47{\pm}7.2%$ for BM, G2, and OS respectively) and attached rate ($45{\pm}12.3%$ vs. $38{\pm}16.1%$ vs. $37{\pm}11.5%$ for BM, G2, and OS respectively) were not different amongst groups. No difference was found in total cell numbers ($74{\pm}13.9$ vs. $64{\pm}9.2$ vs. $76{\pm}6.7$ for BM, G2, and OS respectively), ICM cell numbers ($20{\pm}1.9$ vs. $14{\pm}1.8$ vs. $15{\pm}2.1$), TE cell numbers ($55{\pm}12.5$ vs. $49{\pm}10.7$ vs. $61{\pm}5.9$), % ICM ($30{\pm}2.8%$ vs. $24{\pm}7.0%$ vs. $22.8{\pm}2.2%$) and ICM:TE ratio ($1:2{\pm}0.5$ vs. $1:3.1{\pm}0.8$ vs. $1:3.1{\pm}0.5$) amongst groups. In summary, these results can provide fundamental data to maximize culture condition for in vitro fertilization on B6D2F1 mice.

Keywords

References

  1. Chang MC. 1951. Fertilizing capacity of spermatozoa deposited into the fallopiantubes. Nature 168:697-698.
  2. Chang YS, Lee JY, Moon SY and Kim JK. 1986. Pregnancy and its outcome by in vitro fertilization of human oocytes and embryo transfer: A report of the first test tube babe in Korea. Kor. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 29(3):345-361.
  3. De Vos A, Van de Velde H, Joris H and Van Steirteghem A. 1999. In-vitro matured metaphase-I oocytes have a lower fertilization rate but similar embryo quality as mature metaphase-II oocytes after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod. 14(7):1859-1863. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/14.7.1859
  4. Garcia RM, Ward F, Fair S, O'Meara CM, Wade M, Duffy P and Lonergan P. 2007. Development and quality of sheep embryos cultured in commercial G1.3/G2.3 sequential media, Anim. Reprod. Sci. 98(3-4):233-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2006.03.007
  5. Greve T, Callesen H, Hyttel P, Hoier R and Assey R. 1995. The effects of exogenous exogenous gonadotropins on oocyte and embryo quality in cattle. Theriogenology 43:41-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(94)00013-K
  6. Han SH, Kim HJ, Moon JH, Jee BC, Ku SY, Suh CS, Kim SH, Choi YM, Kim JK and Moon SY. 2006. Comparison of two culture media on in vitro maturation and fertilization of immature oocytes obtained from stimulated cycles. Kor. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 49(7):1492-1500.
  7. Holt IJ, Harding AE, Petty RKH, Morgan-Hughes A. 1990. A new mitocondrial disease associated with mitocondrial DNA heteroplasmy. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 46:428-433.
  8. Im KS and Park KW. 1995. Effects of epidermal growth factor on maturation, fertilization and development of bovine follicular oocytes. Theriogenology 44(2) :209-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-691X(95)00170-D
  9. Izquierdo D, Villamediana P and Paramio MT. 1999. Effect of culture media on embryo development from prepubertal goat IVM-IVF oocytes. Theriogenology 52:847-861. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-691X(99)00177-6
  10. Kim KR, Moon SY and Chang YS. 1995. In vitro maturation immature mouse oocytes using co-culture with human uterine epithelial cells. Kor. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 38(6):1014-1029.
  11. Kim M, Hong SJ, Lee JH, Min CK, Hwang KJ and Park RW. 2011. Comparison of in vitro maturation media of immature oocytes: the effectiveness of blastocyst culture media. Fertil. Steril. 95(2):554-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.10.035
  12. Kim SK, Park JW and Hur EJ. 2002. Effect of human oviduct epithelial cells and vero cell on early mouse embryonal development in vitro. Kor. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 45(6):978-989.
  13. Langendonckt AV, Demylle D, Wyns C, Nisolle M and Donnez J. 2001. Comparison of G1.2/G2.2 and Sydney IVF cleavage/blastocyst sequential media for the culture of human embryos: A prospective, randomized, comparative study. Fertil. Steril. 76(5):1023-1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02854-0
  14. Lee YS, Lee CH, Go HJ, Lee KS, Rheu CH and Kim JD. 2002. Comparative study on development of mouse embryos in conventional medium versus vero cell co-culture. Kor. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 45(6):1026-1032.
  15. Lonergan P, Fair T, Corcoran D and Evans ACO. 2006. Effect of culture environment on gene expression and developmental characteristics in IVF-derived embryos. Theriogenology 65:137-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2005.09.028
  16. Meyer WR, Novotny DB, Fritz MA, Beyler SA, Wolf Lynda J and Lessey BA. 1999. Effect of exogenous gonadotropins on endometrial maturation in oocyte donors. Ferti. Steril. 71(1):109-114. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(98)00390-2
  17. Moulavi F, Hosseini SM, Ashahverdi A and Nasr-Esfahani MH. 2006. Can Vero cell co-culture improve in-vitro maturation of bovine oocytes? Reprod. Biomed. Online. 13(3):404-411 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1472-6483(10)61446-0
  18. Park KS, Kim KS, Seo BB and Song HB. 1992a. Influences of hormone treatment on the ovulation rates, mutation and in vitro fertilization of mouse. Kor. J. Emb. Trans. 7(2):89-96.
  19. Park KS, Lee SH and Song HB. 1994a. Influences of different culture conditions on nuclear maturation and cumulus cell layers of mouse follicular oocytes in vitro. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 36(6):613-622.
  20. Park KS, Lee SH and Song HB. 1994b. In vitro fertilization and polyspermy in follicular oocytes matured in various culture conditions. Kor. J. Fertil. Steril. 21(2):177-182.
  21. Park KS, Lee TH, Song HB and Chun SK. 2000. Human amniotic fluid induces spontaneous hardening of the zona pellucida of mouse immature oocytes during maturation in vitro. Kor. J. Fertil. Steril. 27(1):23-29.
  22. Park KS, Seo BB and Song HB. 1992b. Effects of age and body weight of mice on the ovulation rates, mutation and in vitro fertilization. Kor. J. Agr. Sci., Taegu University 6:27-32.
  23. Park KS, Son WY, Kim JH, Lee KA, Han SY, Ko JJ and Cha KY. 1994c. Influences of human body fluids and conadotrons supplemented in the maturation medium on the nuclear maturation and fertilizability of mouse immature oocytes. Kor. J. Fertil. Steril. 21(2):183-190.
  24. Park SB, Kim HJ, Choi YB, Ahn KH, Lee KH, Yang JB, Yu CS and Seo BB. 2014. The effect of various assisted hating techniques on the mouse early embryo development. Clin. Exp. Reprod. Med. 41(2): 68-74. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2014.41.2.68
  25. Uhm SJ, Gupta MK, Yang JH, Chung HJ, Min TS and Lee HT. 2010. Epidermal growth factor can be used in lieu of follicle-stimulating hormone for nuclear maturation of porne oocytes in vitro. Theriogenology 73(8):1024-1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2009.11.029
  26. White KL, Henke K, Rickords LF, Southern LL, Thompson DL and Wood TC. 1989. Early embryonic development in vitro by coculture with oviductal epithelial cells in pigs. Biol. Reprod. 41:425-430. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod41.3.425
  27. Whittingham DG. 1968. Fertilization of mouse eggs in vitro. Nature 220:592-593. https://doi.org/10.1038/220592a0