The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3D micro-CT analysis of void formations and push-out bonding strength of resin cements used for fiber post cementation

  • Received : 2015.08.30
  • Accepted : 2015.11.23
  • Published : 2016.04.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. To investigate the void parameters within the resin cements used for fiber post cementation by micro-CT (${\mu}CT$) and regional push-out bonding strength. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Twenty-one, single and round shaped roots were enlarged with a low-speed drill following by endodontic treatment. The roots were divided into three groups (n=7) and fiber posts were cemented with Maxcem Elite, Multilink N and Superbond C&B resin cements. Specimens were scanned using ${\mu}CT$ scanner at resolution of $13.7{\mu}m$. The number, area, and volume of voids between dentin and post were evaluated. A method of analysis based on the post segmentation was used, and coronal, middle and apical thirds considered separately. After the ${\mu}CT$ analysis, roots were embedded in epoxy resin and sectioned into 2 mm thick slices (63 sections in total). Push-out testing was performed with universal testing device at 0.5 mm/min cross-head speed. Data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. Overall, significant differences between the resin cements and the post level were observed in the void number, area, and volume (P<.05). Super-Bond C&B showed the most void formation ($44.86{\pm}22.71$). Multilink N showed the least void surface ($3.51{\pm}2.24mm^2$) and volume ($0.01{\pm}0.01mm^3$). Regional push-out bond strength of the cements was not different (P>.05). CONCLUSION. ${\mu}CT$ proved to be a powerful non-destructive 3D analysis tool for visualizing the void parameters. Multilink N had the lowest void parameters. When efficiency of all cements was evaluated, direct relationship between the post region and push-out bonding strength was not observed.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Department of Inonu University

References

  1. Zicari F, Couthino E, De Munck J, Poitevin A, Scotti R, Naert I, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness and sealing ability of fiber-post bonding. Dent Mater 2008;24:967-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.011
  2. Baba NZ, Golden G, Goodacre CJ. Nonmetallic prefabricated dowels: a review of compositions, properties, laboratory, and clinical test results. J Prosthodont 2009;18:527-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00464.x
  3. Spazzin AO, Galafassi D, de Meira-Junior AD, Braz R, Garbin CA. Influence of post and resin cement on stress distribution of maxillary central incisors restored with direct resin composite. Oper Dent 2009;34:223-9. https://doi.org/10.2341/08-73
  4. Goracci C, Grandini S, Bossu M, Bertelli E, Ferrari M. Laboratory assessment of the retentive potential of adhesive posts: a review. J Dent 2007;35:827-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2007.07.009
  5. Boschian Pest L, Cavalli G, Bertani P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002;18:596-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0109-5641(02)00003-9
  6. Furuya Y, Huang SH, Takeda Y, Fok A, Hayashi M. Fracture strength and stress distributions of pulpless premolars restored with fiber posts. Dent Mater J 2014;33:852-8. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-113
  7. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Goracci C, Vichi A, Mason PN, Radovic I, Tay F. Long-term retrospective study of the clinical performance of fiber posts. Am J Dent 2007;20:287-91.
  8. Bergoli CD, Amaral M, Boaro LC, Braga RR, Valandro LF. Fiber post cementation strategies: effect of mechanical cycling on push-out bond strength and cement polymerization stress. J Adhes Dent 2012;14:471-8.
  9. de Durao Mauricio PJ1, Gonzalez-Lopez S, Aguilar-Mendoza JA, Felix S, Gonzalez-Rodriguez MP. Comparison of regional bond strength in root thirds among fiber-reinforced posts luted with different cements. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2007;83:364-72.
  10. Lundstrom TS, Gebart BR. Influence from process parameters on void formation in resin transfer molding. Polymer Composites 1994;15:25-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750150105
  11. Drummond JL. Degradation, fatigue, and failure of resin dental composite materials. J Dent Res 2008;87:710-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910808700802
  12. D'Arcangelo C, Cinelli M, De Angelis F, D'Amario M. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98: 193-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9
  13. Rasimick BJ, Wan J, Musikant BL, Deutsch AS. A review of failure modes in teeth restored with adhesively luted endodontic dowels. J Prosthodont 2010;19:639-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2010.00647.x
  14. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:235-40.
  15. Nazari A, Sadr A, Shimada Y, Tagami J, Sumi Y. 3D assessment of void and gap formation in flowable resin composites using optical coherence tomography. J Adhes Dent 2013; 15:237-43.
  16. Milutinovic-Nikolic AD, Medic VB, Vukovic ZM. Porosity of different dental luting cements. Dent Mater 2007;23:674-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.06.006
  17. Geirsson J, Thompson JY, Bayne SC. Porosity evaluation and pore size distribution of a novel directly placed ceramic restorative material. Dent Mater 2004;20:987-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.07.003
  18. del Valle S, Mino N, Munoz F, Gonzalez A, Planell JA, Ginebra MP. In vivo evaluation of an injectable Macroporous Calcium Phosphate Cement. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007;18: 353-61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0700-y
  19. Jung M, Lommel D, Klimek J. The imaging of root canal obturation using micro-CT. Int Endod J 2005;38:617-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2591.2005.00990.x
  20. Keles A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, Versiani MA. Micro-CT evaluation of root filling quality in oval-shaped canals. Int Endod J 2014;47:1177-84. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12269
  21. Keles A, Ahmetoglu F, Uzun I. Quality of different guttapercha techniques when filling experimental internal resorptive cavities: a micro-computed tomography study. Aust Endod J 2014;40:131-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/aej.12043
  22. Swain MV, Xue J. State of the art of Micro-CT applications in dental research. Int J Oral Sci 2009;1:177-88. https://doi.org/10.4248/IJOS09031
  23. Kato A, Ohno N. Construction of three-dimensional tooth model by micro-computed tomography and application for data sharing. Clin Oral Investig 2009;13:43-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-008-0198-4
  24. Keles A, Alcin H, Kamalak A, Versiani MA. Oval-shaped canal retreatment with self-adjusting file: a micro-computed tomography study. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:1147-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-1086-0
  25. Malkoc MA, Sevimay M, Tatar I, Celik HH. Micro-CT Detection and Characterization of Porosity in Luting Cements. J Prosthodont 2015;24:553-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12251
  26. Nomoto R, McCabe JF. Effect of mixing methods on the compressive strength of glass ionomer cements. J Dent 2001; 29:205-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(01)00010-0
  27. Asheibi F, Qualtrough AJ, Mellor A, Withers PJ, Lowe T. Micro-CT evaluation of the effectiveness of the combined use of rotary and hand instrumentation in removal of Resilon. Dent Mater J 2014;33:1-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-149
  28. Ng YL, Mann V, Rahbaran S, Lewsey J, Gulabivala K. Outcome of primary root canal treatment: systematic review of the literature - Part 2. Influence of clinical factors. Int Endod J 2008;41:6-31.
  29. Maccari PC, Conceicao EN, Nunes MF. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts. J Esthet Restor Dent 2003;15: 25-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8240.2003.tb00279.x
  30. Barcellos RR, Correia DP, Farina AP, Mesquita MF, Ferraz CC, Cecchin D. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with intra-radicular post: the effects of post system and dentine thickness. J Biomech 2013;46:2572-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.016
  31. Kainose K, Nakajima M, Foxton R, Wakabayashi N, Tagami J. Stress distribution in root filled teeth restored with various post and core techniques: effect of post length and crown 3D micro-CT analysis of void formations and push-out bonding strength of resin cements used for fiber post cementation height. Int Endod J 2015;48:1023-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.12397
  32. Baudin C, Osorio R, Toledano M, de Aza S. Work of fracture of a composite resin: fracture-toughening mechanisms. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009;89:751-8.
  33. Serafino C, Gallina G, Cumbo E, Ferrari M. Surface debris of canal walls after post space preparation in endodontically reated teeth: a scanning electron microscopic study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97:381-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2003.10.004
  34. Pereira JR, Lins do Valle A, Ghizoni JS, Lorenzoni FC, Ramos MB, Dos Reis So MV. Push-out bond strengths of different dental cements used to cement glass fiber posts. J Prosthet Dent 2013;110:134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60353-4
  35. Kalkan M, Usumez A, Ozturk AN, Belli S, Eskitascioglu G. Bond strength between root dentin and three glass-fiber post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2006;96:41-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.05.005
  36. Chen Q, Cai Q, Li Y, Wei XY, Huang Z, Wang XZ. Effect on push-out bond strength of glass-fiber posts functionalized with polydopamine using different adhesives. J Adhes Dent 2014;16:177-84.

Cited by

  1. Microscopic Texture of Polypropylene Fiber-Reinforced Concrete with X-Ray Computed Tomography vol.2019, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2386590
  2. Effect of Magnification during Post Space Preparation on Root Cleanness and Fiber Post Bond Strength vol.30, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902662
  3. Diffractive small angle X-ray scattering imaging for anisotropic structures vol.10, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12635-2
  4. Gaps at the interface between dentine and self‐adhesive resin cement in post‐endodontic restorations quantified in 3D by phase contrast‐enhanced micro‐CT vol.53, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.13232
  5. CAD/CAM Milled Glass Fiber Posts: Adaptation and Mechanical Behavior in Flared Root Canals vol.46, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.2341/20-198-l
  6. Comparative Evaluation of Push Out Bond Strength of Fiber Post Using One Self-Etch Resin Cement and Two Self-Adhesive Resin Cements - An In-Vitro Study, Punjab Government Dental College and Hospital, vol.10, pp.33, 2016, https://doi.org/10.14260/jemds/2021/554
  7. Root canal pre-treatment and adhesive system affect bond strength durability of fiber posts ex vivo vol.25, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-03945-1
  8. Does Multi-Fiber-Reinforced Composite-Post Influence the Filling Ability and the Bond Strength in Root Canal? vol.8, pp.12, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering8120195