한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 논문집 (Journal of the Korea institute for structural maintenance and inspection)

  • 제20권3호
  • /
  • Pages.83-92
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 2234-6937(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-6979(eISSN)
한국구조물진단유지관리공학회 (Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비선형 동적해석을 통한 국내 비보강 조적조 건축물의 내진성능 평가

Evaluation of the Seismic Performance for Domestic URM Buildings Using Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis

  • 투고 : 2016.01.18
  • 심사 : 2016.04.04
  • 발행 : 2016.05.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 비선형 동적해석을 통한 국내 비보강 조적조의 내진성능을 평가하는데 있다. 보다 정밀한 내진성능 평가를 위해 조적벽체의 파괴모드를 고려한 비선형 이력모델을 이용하고자 하나, 선행연구의 비선형 이력모델은 정적반복가력해석에 대한 검증만이 수행되었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 진동대실험과 동적해석 결과를 비교하여 제안한 비보강 조적조 비선형 해석모델의 신뢰성을 검증한 다음, 국내 비보강 조적조 건축물의 비선형 동적해석을 수행하고 결과를 분석하여 내진성능을 평가하였다. 그 결과, 1층의 조적조 건축물의 경우 개구부율에 관계없이 비교적 지진피해가 작은 반면, 2층 이상의 국내 비보강 조적조 건축물의 대부분이 국내에 발생가능한 지진에 취약하였다.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the seismic performance of domestic unreinforced masonry(URM) buildings using nonlinear dynamic analysis. For that, the nonlinear hysteresis models suggested in the previous research were validated for the dynamic analysis. The results of the shaking table test were compared with the dynamic analysis results using the suggested nonlinear hysteresis models. As a result, the nonlinear hysteresis models were expected to be applicable to the dynamic analysis of URM buildings. Based on the models, the dynamic analysis of domestic URM buildings varying the number of stories and opening ratio was carried out. The analysis results showed that most of the domestic URM buildings were very vulnerable to design earthquake in Korea.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea (2009), Korean Building Code and Commentary, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (in Korean).
  2. Baek, E. L., Kim, J. H., Lee, S. H., Oh, S. H. (2014), Nonlinear Analysis Model Considering Failure Mode of Unreinforced Masonry Wall, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 18(4), 33-40 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2014.18.4.033
  3. Federal Emergency Management Agency (1997), NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Washington, D.C..
  4. Federal Emergency Management Agency (2000), Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, American Society of Civil Engineers(ASCE).
  5. Heo, J. S., Lee, S. H. (2009), Analytical Study on the Seismic Capccity for Existing Masonry Building in Korea, Journal of The Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 13(6), 75-87 (in Korean).
  6. Lee, Y. J., Lee, J. H., Oh, S. H., Lee, S. H. (2011), Shaking Table Test of a 2-Story Masonry Building for Evaluation the Seismic Performance, Proceedings of Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation, Asan 2, 46-46 (in Korean).
  7. Li, K. (2009), CANNY Manual.
  8. National Disaster Management Institute (2008), Development of the Seismic Fragility Function for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul (in Korean).
  9. National Disaster Management Institute (2009), Study on Seismic Retrofitting Techniques for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings, National Disaster Management Institute, Seoul (in Korean).
  10. Yi, W. H., Lee, J. H., Oh, S. H., Yang, W. J., Kang, D. E. (2005), A Study on Evaluation of Shear Capacity of Unreinforced Masonry Wall, Journal of the Architectural institute of Korea Structure & Construction, 21(10), 3-10(in Korean).