Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

  • 제17권7호
  • /
  • Pages.3111-3116
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1513-7368(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2476-762X(eISSN)
아시아태평양암예방학회 (Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparing Recurrence and Complications After Laparoscopy and Laparotomy Surgery among Patients Suffering from Colorectal Cancer, Shiraz, Iran

  • Ghaem, Haleh (Research Center for Health Sciences, Department of Epidemiology, School of Health, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Amiri, Zahra (Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Kianpour, Fatemeh (Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Rezaianzadeh, Abbas (Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Hosseini, Seyed Vahid (Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences) ;
  • Khazraei, Hajar (Colorectal Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences)
  • 발행 : 2016.07.01
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background: The goal of this study was to compare the rate of recurrence and occurrence of complications in colorectal cancer patients after two kinds of laparoscopy and laparotomy. Materials and Methods: A follow-up study was carried out among 358 patients who suffered from colorectal cancer from 2012-2014. The data were gathered from colorectal research center in Shiraz, Shahid Faghihi hospital, and analyzed using the chi-square test, logistic regression, and multinomial regression. Results: The average age of these patients was $56.3{\pm}14.6$, 55.0% being men. Moreover, 57.8% of them underwent laparoscopy surgery and 42.2% of the patients underwent laparotomysurgery and the conversion rate was 58.0% which ultimately was put under the category of laparotomy surgery. After biennial median follow-up, differences in the occurrence of complications such as bleeding (hemorrhage), fever, intestine blockage and wound infection in these two kinds of surgery werestatistically significant (P<0.05). However, the rate of recurrence and the patients' ultimate status (alive without disease, alive with disease, and death) did not significantly differ between these two surgery groups. Conclusions: Post-operation complications were laparoscopy surgery were less than those in laparotomy. However, the outcomes such as patients' ultimate status and recurrence were similar between the two groups.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

참고문헌

  1. Abdolahi A, Feizollah M (2009). The prevalence of colorectal tumors in the people who referred to the two centers in Tehran from 2004-2007. Medical Science J Islamic Azad University, 19, 65-8.
  2. Agarwal S, Gincherman M, Birnbaum E, et al (2015). Comparison of long-term follow up of laparoscopic versus open colectomy for transverse colon cancer. Proc Bayl Univ Med Cent, 28, 296-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08998280.2015.11929254
  3. Arezzo A, Passera R, Scozzari G, et al (2013). Laparoscopy for rectal cancer reduces short-term mortality and morbidity: results of a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc, 27, 1485-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-012-2649-x
  4. Asnaashari F, sohrabi MR, Abdi A, et al (2008). The assessment of colorectal cancer prevalence on the base of survival data in Iran in 2007. Res Med, 32, 221-5.
  5. Barzin G, Ostovaneh MR, Tayebi S, et al (2014). Screening colonoscopy in first-degree relative of pationts with colorectal cancer. Arch Iranian Med, 17, 115-7.
  6. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, et al (2015). A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer. N Engl J Med, 372, 1324-32. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414882
  7. Braga M, Frasson M, Vignali A, et al (2007). Laparoscopic resection in rectal cancer patients: outcome and cost-benefit analysis. Dis Colon Rectum, 50, 464-71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-006-0798-5
  8. Braga M, Vignali A, Gianotti L, et al (2002). Laparoscopic versus open colorectal surgery a randomized trial on short-term outcome. Ann Surg, 236, 759-67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200212000-00008
  9. Fleshman J, Sargent DJ, Green E, et al (2007). Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5 year data from the COST Study Group trial. Ann Surg, 246, 655-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e318155a762
  10. Guillou PJ , Quirke P , Thorpe H, et al (2005). Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopicassisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 365, 1718-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66545-2
  11. Ito I, Mukai M, Ninomiya H, et al (2008). Comparison between intravenous and oral postoperative adjuvant immunochemotherapy in patients with stage II colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep, 20, 1189-94.
  12. Jayne DG, Guillou PJ, Thorpe H, et al (2007). Randomized trial of laparoscopic-assisted resection of colorectal carcinoma: 3-year results of the UK MRC CLASICC Trial Group. J Clin Oncol, 25, 3061-8 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2006.09.7758
  13. Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al (2004). Hand-assisted laparoscopic coloectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc, 18, 577-81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-8148-3
  14. Kuhry E (2005). Laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer [dissertation]. netherland: erasmus university rotterdam.
  15. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, et al (2002). Laparoscopy-assisted coloctomy versus open coloctomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet, 359, 2224-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5
  16. Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammrehofer KA, et al (1998). A Prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J AM Coll Surg, 187, 46-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X
  17. Mukai M, Fukasawa M, Kishima K, et al (2009). Trans-anal reinforcing sutures after double stapling for low rectal cancer: Report of two cases. Oncol Rep, 21, 335-9.
  18. Mukai M, Tajima T, Nakasaki H, et al (2003). Efficacy of postoperative adjuvant oral immunochemotherapy in patients with Dukes' B colorectal cancer. Ann Cancer Res Therap, 11, 201-14. https://doi.org/10.4993/acrt1992.11.201
  19. Nelson H, Sargent DJ, Wieand HS, et al (2014). A Comparison of Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colectomy for Colon Cancer. New England J Med, 350, 2050-9.
  20. Nemani H, Zalejoo N, Yaghmaee b, et al (2009). GSTP1 in colorectal cancer.scientific- research. J Kermanshah Med Sci University, 13, 39-45.
  21. Ohtani H, Tamamori Y, Arimoto Y, et al (2011). A meta-analysis of the short- and long-term results of randomized con-trolled trials that compared laparoscopy-assisted and conventional open surgery for colorectal cancer. J Cancer, 2, 425-34. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.2.425
  22. Roscio F, Bertoglio C, De Luca A, et al (2012). Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer. Int J Surg, 10, 290-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.04.020
  23. Salari A, Dehghan H (2007). Epidemiologic investigation of colorectal cancer in patients referring to Yazd shahid Dr. rahnemoon and Afshar hospitals. J Medical Science Healthtreatment Services in Yazd Shahid Sadoughi, 15, 20-5.
  24. Tajima T, Mukai M, Yamazaki M, et al (2014). Comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic surgery and conventional laparotomy for colorectal cancer: Interim results from a single institution. Oncol Letters, 8, 627-32. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2014.2182
  25. Vendramini DL, Albuquerque MM, Schmidt EM, et al (2012). Laparoscopic and open colorectal resections for colorectal cancer. ABCD Arq Bras Cir Dig, 25, 81-7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-67202012000200004
  26. http:/www.WHO.int/mediacentre/news/notes/2011/world_cancer_day_20110204/en/.
  27. Zhao JK, Chen NZ, Zheng JB, et al (2014). Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis on clinical efficacy. Molecular Clin Oncol, 2, 1097-102. https://doi.org/10.3892/mco.2014.345