DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

개념이해와 학습활동을 고려한 네트워크 및 디지털 창작도구 교육과정 모델 개발

Development of Network and Digital creation tools Curriculum Model to consider understanding concepts and learning activity

  • 투고 : 2016.11.08
  • 심사 : 2016.12.07
  • 발행 : 2016.12.31

초록

본 연구는 학교현장의 SW교육과정 적용을 위해 SW교육 중 네트워크 및 디지털 창작도구 교육과정에 대한 연구이다. 이를 위해 국내외 SW교육과정 분석을 통한 주요한 키워드를 추출하여 개념이해와 학습활동 요소를 각 영역별 특성에 맞게 재구조화한 교육과정 모델을 개발하였다. 네트워크 영역은 개념이해 중심, 디지털 창작도구 영역은 활동중심의 형태로 영역별 교육과정을 모델링하였으며, 이를 기반으로 영역별 내용요소를 구성하여 전문가 검증을 통한 타당도를 제시하였다. 또한 다른 영역의 내용요소들을 결합하여 학교에서 재구성하기 쉽게 제시되었고 연구의 결과는 국내 SW교육과정 표준모델 적용을 위한 기초연구 자료로써 활용되기를 기대한다.

This paper is a research on the curriculums of network and digital creation tools among SW education in order to apply them to SW curriculum in education fields. For doing so, a curriculum model was developed by extracting main key words through the analyses of domestic and foreign SW curriculum, and reorganization of concept understanding and learning activity elements was made so as to be fit to characteristics of each curriculum. And curriculums were remodeled by curriculum such like concept understanding was focussed in network, activities in digital creation tools and its validity was suggested through expert verification by composing contents elements based on the results. Also, this model was proposed so that each school could recompose it easily by combining contents elements of other curriculums. Therefore, the suggested model could be utilized as a basic research data in applying domestic SW curriculum standard model.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. CAS (2013), Computing in the national curriculum: A guide for primary teachers. Computing at school.
  2. Chul Kim (2014). A Study on Contents of Robot Education Curriculum. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 18(3), 443-452. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2014.18.3.443
  3. Chul Kim (2015). A Development of Robot and Convergence Activity Curriculum Model for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(4), 481-499. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.481
  4. CSTA (2011). The 2011 CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved from http://www.csteachers.org/page/CSTA_Standards.
  5. K-12 CS Standards Revision Task Force members (2016). The Interim CSTA K-12 Computer Science Standards. Retrieved http://www.csteachers.org/resource/resmgr/Docs/Standards/2016StandardsRevision/INTERIM_StandardsFINAL_07222.pdf.
  6. Department for Education in UK (2013). National curriculum in England: computing programmes of study. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-computing-programmes-ofstudy.
  7. HITSA (2016). ProgeTiger Programme 2015-2017. Retrieved from http://www.hitsa.ee/it-education/educational-programmes/progetiger.
  8. Hongrae Kim (2016). The Research about Policy Background of Computer Science Education in UK School: Lesson from the UK. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(2), 207-218. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.20.2.207
  9. Hyunbae Kim (2015). A Development of Curriculum Model on Information Ethics and Creation Tools for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(4), 545-556. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.545
  10. JaMee Kim, WonGyu Lee (2015). China's informatics curriculum to consider equality and excellence. Journal of The Korean Association of Computer Education, 18(2), 11-20. The Korean Association Of Computer Education.
  11. JaMee Kim, WonGyu Lee (2016). Implications for Informatics Curriculum Standard of KOREA through the Comparison of CSTA 2003 and 2011. Journal of The Korean Association of Computer Education, 19(1), 41-51. The Korean Association Of Computer Education
  12. Joanna Goode, Gail Chapman (2016). Exploring Computer Science. Retrieved from http://www.exploringcs.org/curriculum.
  13. K12cs.org (2016). K-12 Computer Science Framework. Retrieved form http://K12cs.org.
  14. Kapsu Kim (2016). An Implications of Computer Education in Korea from the U.S., U.K. and Germany Computer Curriculums. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 20(4), 421-432. The Korean Association of Information Education.
  15. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (2016). Massachusetts Digital Literacy and Computer Science (DLCS) Curriculum Framework. Retrieved from http://www.doe.mass.edu.
  16. Microsoft (2016). Digital Literacy Advanced Curriculum. Retrieved from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/DigitalLiteracy/advancedcurriculum.aspx.
  17. Ministry of Education (2015). 2015 Revised Curriculum. Korea Ministry of Education.
  18. Ministry of Education (2015). Software Education Guidelines. Korea Ministry of Education.
  19. NetSciEd (2016). Network Literacy: Essential Concepts and Core Ideas. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/binghamton.edu/netscied/teaching-learning/network-concepts.
  20. Seungki Shin, Youngkwon Bae (2015). Study on the Implications about Curriculum Design through the Analysis of Software Education Policy in Estonia. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(3), 361-372. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.3.361
  21. Young-Hoon Sung (2016). Development and Application of CT-SPI Model for Improving Computational Thinking for Elementary School Students. Journal of The Korea Society of Computer and Information, 21(1), 169-180. The Korea Society of Computer and Information. https://doi.org/10.9708/jksci.2016.21.1.169
  22. Younghoon Sung, Youngsik Jeong, Namje Park (2016). Implication of Network, Digital creation tools, and Robot curriculum by KAIE through the Analysis of domestic and Foreign SW curriculum. The Korean Association of Information Education Research Journal, 7(3), 17-24. The Korean Association of Information Education.
  23. Youngsik Jeong, Kapsu Kim, Inkee Jeong, Hyunbae Kim, Chul Kim, Jeongsu Yu, Chongwoo Kim, Myunghui Hong (2015). A Development of the Software Education Curriculum Model for Elementary Students. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 19(4), 467-480. The Korean Association of Information Education. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2015.19.4.467