- Volume 18 Issue 3
DOI QR Code
Statistical Classification of Highway Segments for Improving the Efficiency of Short-term Traffic Count Planning
효율적인 교통량 조사를 계획하기 위한 조사구간의 통계적 특성 분류 연구
- Jung, YooSeok ;
- Oh, JuSam (ICT Convergence and Integration Research Institute, Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology)
- Received : 2016.02.24
- Accepted : 2016.05.17
- Published : 2016.06.15
PURPOSES : The demand for extending national highways is increasing, but traffic monitoring is hindered because of resource limitations. Hence, this study classified highway segments into 5 types to improve the efficiency of short-term traffic count planning. METHODS : The traffic volume trends of 880 highway segments were classified through R-squared and linear regression analyses; the steadiness of traffic volume trends was evaluated through coefficient of variance (COV), and the normality of the data were determined through the Shapiro-Wilk W-test. RESULTS : Of the 880 segments, 574 segments had relatively low COV and were classified as type 1 segments, and 123 and 64 segments with increasing and decreasing traffic volume trends were classified as type 2 and type 3 segments, respectively; 80 segments that failed the normality test were classified as type 4, and the remaining 39 were classified as type 5 segments. CONCLUSIONS : A theoretical basis for biennial count planning was established. Biennial count is recommended for types 1~4 because their mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) are approximately 10%. For type 5 (MAPE =19.26%), the conventional annual count can be continued. The results of this analysis can reduce the traffic monitoring budget.
- California DOT, 2013. Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic on the California State Highway System.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2013. Traffic Monitoring Guideline.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2015. Yearbook of road statistics.
- Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, 2015. 2014 Annual Traffic Volume Report.
- New Jersey DOT, 2014. New Jersey Traffic Monitoring Program.
- New York State DOT, 2011. Traffic Data Report for New York State.
- Royston, P., 1992. Approximating the Shapiro-Wilk W-Test for non-normality. Stat. Comput. 2, 117-119. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01891203
- Seber, G.A.F., Lee, A.J., 2012. Linear Regression Analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
- Thomas F. Barry, Jr., 2002. Traffic Monitoring Procedure.
- Vandervalk-Ostrander, A., 2009. AASHTO Guidelines for Traffic Data Programs. Aashto.
- Wang, C. (Ross), Tsai, Y. (James), 2013. Use of Reduction-Effectiveness Ratios to Evaluate Reduced Traffic Data Collection Plans. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2339, 13-18. https://doi.org/10.3141/2339-02
- Wiegand, K., n.d. 2013 Georgia Traffic Monitoring Program.
- Yoo Seok Jung, Ju Sam Oh, 2015. Determination of a Homogeneous Segment for Short-term Traffic Count Efficiency Using a Statistical Approach. International Journal of Highway Engineering :: Vol.17 No.4 pp.135-141. https://doi.org/10.7855/IJHE.2015.17.4.135