한국지반공학회논문집 (Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society)

  • 제32권6호
  • /
  • Pages.49-59
  • /
  • 2016
  • /
  • 1229-2427(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-646X(eISSN)
한국지반공학회 (Korean Geotechnical Society)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

반복단순전단시험에 기반한 조립토의 설계 액상화 저항 곡선 개발

Cyclic Simple Shear Test Based Design Liquefaction Resistance Curve of Granular Soil

  • 투고 : 2016.05.17
  • 심사 : 2016.06.03
  • 발행 : 2016.06.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 논문에서는 지진 시 작용하는 반복적 하중에 의하여 발생하는 잔류 과잉간극수압 예측에 필요한 반복저항응력비(CRR)와 재하횟수 N 간의 관계를 나타내는 액상화 저항 곡선을 반복단순전단시험과 문헌조사를 통하여 도출하였다. CRR과 N 자료는 두 가지 모델을 이용하여 최적 곡선을 계산하였으며 계측된 자료와 비교한 결과, 이중 한 가지 모델은 CRR이 다소 작게 산정되어 정확도가 떨어지는 것으로 나타났다. 다양한 액상화 저항 곡선을 살펴본 결과, 반복저항응력비(CRR)는 재하횟수 N = 15에서의 CRR($CRR_{N=15}$)로 정규화할 경우, 분산이 크게 감소하는 것을 확인하였다. 이와 같은 정규화가 특별히 유용한 이유는 $CRR_{N=15}$은 실내시험이 아니라 현장시험으로부터 쉽게 산정 가능하기 때문이다. 정규화를 통하여 평균과 상한 및 하한 곡선을 도출하였으며, 각각에 상응하는 설계식과 변수 또한 제시하였다. 제안된 곡선은 추후 부지 고유의 지반응답해석과 항만 구조물의 안정성 평가 등에 활용될 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

We develop liquefaction resistance curves, which represent the correlation between cyclic resistance ratio (CRR) and number of cycles (N) to estimate the build-up of residual excess pore pressure from simple shear tests performed for this study and also from published literature. The liquefaction curve is calculated from two models. The comparisons show that one of the models is not reliable because it underestimates CRR. The scatter of the data is shown to be significantly reduced when CRR is normalized to the resistance ratio at N = 15 ($CRR_{N=15}$). Use of the normalization is particularly useful because CRR can be easily estimated from field tests. From normalization, we propose mean, upper, and lower curves. The corresponding design equation and its parameters are also proposed. We believe that the proposed curves can be used for effective stress site response analyses and evaluation of the seismic performance of port structures.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Ambraseys, N.N. (1988), "Engineering Seismology", Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol.17, No.1, pp.51-105. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290170102
  2. Andrus, R.D., Hayati, H., and Mohanan, N.P. (2009), "Correcting Liquefaction Resistance for Aged Sands Using Measured to Estimated Velocity Ratio", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.135, No.6, pp.735-744. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000025
  3. Andrus, R.D. and Stokoe II, K.H. (2000), "Liquefaction Resistance of Soils from Shear-Wave Velocity", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.126, No.11, pp.1015-1025. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2000)126:11(1015)
  4. Andrus, R.D. and Stokoe, K.H. (1997), Liquefaction resistance based on shear wave velocity, 1088-3800, US National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER), pp.89-128.
  5. Arango, I. (1996), "Magnitude Scaling Factors for Soil Liquefaction Evaluations", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-Asce, Vol.122, No.11, pp.929-936. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:11(929)
  6. Booker, J.R., Rahman, M.S., and Seed, H.B. (1976), GADFLEA: A computer program for the analysis of pore pressure generation and dissipation during cyclic or earthquake loading, California Univ., Berkeley (USA). Earthquake Engineering Research Center.
  7. Boulanger, R. and Idriss, I. (2014), CPT and SPT based liquefaction triggering procedures, UCD/CGM-14/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis.
  8. Boulanger, R. and Idriss, I. (2016), "CPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Procedure", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.142, No.2, pp.1-11.
  9. Boulanger, R. and Ziotopoulou, K. (2015), PM4Sand (Version 3): a sand plasticity model for earthquake engineering applications, UCD/CGM-15/01, Center for Geotechnical Modeling, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California at Davis.
  10. Boulanger, R.W. and Seed, R.B. (1995), "Liquefaction of Sand under Bidirectional Monotonic and Cyclic Loading", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering-Asce, Vol.121, No.12, pp.870-878. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1995)121:12(870)
  11. Brandes, H.G. and Seidman, J. (2008), "Dynamic and Static behavior of Calcareous Sands", The Eighteenth International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference: International Society of Offshore and Polar Engineers, pp.573-578.
  12. Castro, G. (1975), "Liquefaction and Cyclic Mobility of Saturated Sands", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.101, No.6, pp.551-569.
  13. Cetin, K.O., Seed, R.B., Der Kiureghian, A., Tokimatsu, K., Harder Jr, L.F., Kayen, R.E., and Moss, R.E. (2004), "Standard Penetration Test-based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.130, No.12, pp.1314-1340. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:12(1314)
  14. Da Fonseca, A.V., Soares, M., and Fourie, A.B. (2015), "Cyclic DSS Tests for the Evaluation of Stress Densification Effects in Liquefaction Assessment", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.75, pp.98-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2015.03.016
  15. De Alba, P.A., Chan, C.K., and Seed, H.B. (1976), "Sand Liquefaction in Large-scale Simple Shear Tests", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol.102, No.9, pp.909-927.
  16. Derakhshandi, M., Rathje, E.M., Hazirbaba, K., and Mirhosseini, S. (2008), "The Effect of Plastic Fines on the Pore Pressure Generation Characteristics of Saturated Sands", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.28, No.5, pp.376-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.07.002
  17. Finn, W., Pickering, D.J., and Bransby, P.L. (1971), "Sand Liquefaction in Triaxial and Simple Shear Tests", Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol.97, No.4, pp.639-659.
  18. Idriss, I. and Boulanger, R.W. (2008), Soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake engineering research institute.
  19. Idriss, I.M. and Boulanger, R.W. (2012), "Examination of SPT-Based Liquefaction Triggering Correlations", Earthquake Spectra, Vol.28, No.3, pp.989-1018. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000071
  20. Ishihara, K. (1996), Soil behaviour in earthquake geotechnics, The Oxford engineering science series.
  21. Kayen, R., Moss, R., Thompson, E., Seed, R., Cetin, K., Kiureghian, A.D., Tanaka, Y., and Tokimatsu, K. (2013), "Shear-wave Velocitybased Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.139, No.3, pp.407-419. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000743
  22. Kramer, S.L. (1996), Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Prentice Hall.
  23. Lee, K.L. and Albaisa, A. (1974), "Earthquake Induced Settlements in Saturated Sands", Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol.100, No.1, pp.387-406.
  24. Liu, A.H., Stewart, J.P., Abrahamson, N.A., and Moriwaki, Y. (2001), "Equivalent Number of Uniform Stress Cycles for Soil Liquefaction Analysis", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.127, No.12, pp.1017-1026. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:12(1017)
  25. MOF (1999), Standard of Seismic design for fishing port and harbor facilities, Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.
  26. Moss, R., Seed, R.B., Kayen, R.E., Stewart, J.P., Der Kiureghian, A., and Cetin, K.O. (2006), "CPT-based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of in Situ Seismic Soil Liquefaction Potential", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.132, No.8, pp.1033-1051.
  27. Park, T., Park, D., and Ahn, J.K. (2014), "Pore Pressure Model based on Accumulated Stress", Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, Vol.13, No.7, pp.1913-1926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9702-1
  28. Polito, C.P., Green, R.A., and Lee, J. (2008), "Pore Pressure Generation Models for Sands and Silty Soils Subjected to Cyclic Loading", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.134, No.10, pp.1490-1500. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:10(1490)
  29. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1982), Ground motions and soil liquefaction during earthquakes, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute.
  30. Seed, H.B. and Peacock, W.H. (1971), "Test Procedures for Measuring Soil Liquefaction Characteristics", Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE, Vol.97, No.8, pp.1099-1119.
  31. Seed, H.B., Tokimatsu, K., Harder, L., and Chung, R.M. (1985), "Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.111, No.12, pp.1425-1445. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)
  32. Shim, H. (2001), The comparison of undrained behavior of sand between simple shear condition and triaxial compression condition, Master Thesis, Inha University.
  33. Sivathayalan, S. (1994), Static, cyclic and post liquefaction simple shear response of sands, Master thesis, University of British Columbia.
  34. Sriskandakumar, S. (2004), Cyclic loading response of Fraser River sand for validation of numerical models simulating centrifuge tests, Master thesis, University of British Columbia.
  35. Towhata, I. (2008), Geotechnical earthquake engineering, Springer Science and Business Media.
  36. Xenaki, V.C. and Athanasopoulos, G.A. (2003), "Liquefaction Resistance of Sand-silt mixtures: An Experimental Investigation of the Effect of Fines", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.23, No.3, pp.183-194.
  37. Yoon, Y., Yoon, G., and Choi, J. (2007), "Liquefaction Strength of Shelly Sand in Cyclic Simple Shear Test", Journal of Korean Geo-Environmental Society, Vol.8, No.6, pp.69-76.
  38. Youd, T.L. and Noble, S.K. (1997), Liquefaction criteria based on statistical and probabilistic analyses, US National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (NCEER).
  39. Ziotopoulou, K. and Boulanger, R.W. (2012), "Constitutive Modeling of Duration and Overburden Effects in Liquefaction Evaluations", Proceedings of second international conference on performancebased design in earthquake geotechnical engineering. Taormina, Italy, May, pp.28-30.