- Volume 35 Issue 3
DOI QR Code
A Pilot Study on the Control Performance of Foot-Controlled Mouse Devices for the Nondisabled People
- Hong, Seung Kweon (Department of Industrial and Management Engineering, Korea National University of Transportation)
- Received : 2016.03.31
- Accepted : 2016.05.11
- Published : 2016.06.30
Objective: In this study, two types of foot-controlled mouse devices are compared with a hand mouse in the input tasks requiring repetitively switching between a keyboard and a mouse. Background: Foot-controlled mouse devices have been developed for persons with impairments in the mobility of their hands. However, some researchers insisted that the foot-controlled mouse devices could be effectively used by the persons with no limits to their hand mobility. There are needs to investigate the efficiency of the foot-controlled mouse devices, when they are used by the nondisabled people. Method: Participants conducted the input tasks, requiring repetitive switches between a keyboard and a computer mouse. The used computer mouse devices were two types of foot-controlled mouse and a typical hand mouse. Participants performed three types of input task for five days and three types of task performance were measured; the number of completed input tasks within a given practice time, subjective satisfaction level and the time wasted for the mouse control. Results: For five days, the performance of input tasks sharply increased in input tasks by foot-controlled mouse devices rather than a hand mouse. After five days, the level of satisfaction on the foot-controlled mouse devices approached to about 76% of a hand mouse satisfaction level. The control time of the foot-controlled mouse devices also approached to about 109% of a hand mouse control time. Conclusion: After only five-day practice, the input task performance by foot-controlled mouse devices approached to that of a hand mouse. This result may suggest that the foot-controlled mouse devices can be effectively used as an alternative input device for the nondisabled people, if input tasks are easy and enough practice time is provided. Application: The results of this study might help to design foot-controlled mouse devices and to expend the usage of them.
Supported by : National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
- Hoffmann, E.R., A Comparison of Hand and Foot Movement Times. Ergonomics, 34(4), 397-416, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139108967324
- Hong, S.K. and Kim, S.S., Visual Feedback and Human Performance in the Foot Mouse Control, Journal of the Ergonomics Society of Korea, 31(6), 725-731, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5143/JESK.2012.31.6.725
- Hutchinson, T.E., White, K.P., Martin, W.N., Reichert, K.C. and Frey, L.A., Human- Computer Interaction Using Eye-Gaze Input, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man And Cybernetics, 19(6), 1527-1534, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1109/21.44068
- Karl, L., Pettey, M. and Shneiderman, B., Speech versus Mouse Commands for Word Processing Applications: An empirical evaluation. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 39(4), 667-687, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1006/imms.1993.1078
- Shneiderman, B., The Limits of Speech Recognition, Communications of the ACM, 43(9), 63-65, 2000.
- Simpson, R.C., Computer Access for People with Disabilities: A Human Factors Approach, Rehabilitation Science in Practice, CRC Press, pp. 58-59, 2013.
- Springer, J. and Siebes, C., Position Controlled Input Device for Handicapped: Experimental studies with a footmouse, International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 17, 135-152, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(95)00045-3