Genomics & Informatics

Korea Genome Organization (한국유전체학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Multilevel Precision-Based Rational Design of Chemical Inhibitors Targeting the Hydrophobic Cleft of Toxoplasma gondii Apical Membrane Antigen 1 (AMA1)

  • Vetrivel, Umashankar (Centre for Bioinformatics, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation) ;
  • Muralikumar, Shalini (Centre for Bioinformatics, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation) ;
  • Mahalakshmi, B (L&T Microbiology Research Centre, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation) ;
  • K, Lily Therese (L&T Microbiology Research Centre, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation) ;
  • HN, Madhavan (L&T Microbiology Research Centre, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation) ;
  • Alameen, Mohamed (Centre for Bioinformatics, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation) ;
  • Thirumudi, Indhuja (Centre for Bioinformatics, Kamalnayan Bajaj Institute for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Vision Research Foundation)
  • Received : 2016.03.21
  • Accepted : 2016.04.08
  • Published : 2016.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Toxoplasma gondii is an intracellular Apicomplexan parasite and a causative agent of toxoplasmosis in human. It causes encephalitis, uveitis, chorioretinitis, and congenital infection. T. gondii invades the host cell by forming a moving junction (MJ) complex. This complex formation is initiated by intermolecular interactions between the two secretory parasitic proteins-namely, apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) and rhoptry neck protein 2 (RON2) and is critically essential for the host invasion process. By this study, we propose two potential leads, NSC95522 and NSC179676 that can efficiently target the AMA1 hydrophobic cleft, which is a hotspot for targeting MJ complex formation. The proposed leads are the result of an exhaustive conformational search-based virtual screen with multilevel precision scoring of the docking affinities. These two compounds surpassed all the precision levels of docking and also the stringent post docking and cumulative molecular dynamics evaluations. Moreover, the backbone flexibility of hotspot residues in the hydrophobic cleft, which has been previously reported to be essential for accommodative binding of RON2 to AMA1, was also highly perturbed by these compounds. Furthermore, binding free energy calculations of these two compounds also revealed a significant affinity to AMA1. Machine learning approaches also predicted these two compounds to possess more relevant activities. Hence, these two leads, NSC95522 and NSC179676, may prove to be potential inhibitors targeting AMA1-RON2 complex formation towards combating toxoplasmosis.

Keywords

References

  1. Holland GN. Ocular toxoplasmosis: a global reassessment. Part I: epidemiology and course of disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:973-988.
  2. Thirumudi I, Vetrivel U, Mahalakshmi B, K LT, Hn M. Insights on drug targeting of Toxoplasma gondii host invasion proteins: a review. Asian J Pharm Clin Res 2015;8:52-57.
  3. Tenter AM, Heckeroth AR, Weiss LM. Toxoplasma gondii: from animals to humans. Int J Parasitol 2000;30:1217-1258. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00124-7
  4. Kim K, Weiss LM. Toxoplasma gondii: the model apicomplexan. Int J Parasitol 2004;34:423-432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2003.12.009
  5. Hehl AB, Basso WU, Lippuner C, Ramakrishnan C, Okoniewski M, Walker RA, et al. Asexual expansion of Toxoplasma gondii merozoites is distinct from tachyzoites and entails expression of non-overlapping gene families to attach, invade, and replicate within feline enterocytes. BMC Genomics 2015;16:66. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-015-1225-x
  6. Aikawa M, Miller LH, Johnson J, Rabbege J. Erythrocyte entry by malarial parasites: a moving junction between erythrocyte and parasite. J Cell Biol 1978;77:72-82. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.77.1.72
  7. Alexander DL, Mital J, Ward GE, Bradley P, Boothroyd JC. Identification of the moving junction complex of Toxoplasma gondii: a collaboration between distinct secretory organelles. PLoS Pathog 2005;1:e17. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.0010017
  8. Besteiro S, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M. The moving junction of apicomplexan parasites: a key structure for invasion. Cell Microbiol 2011;13:797-805. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-5822.2011.01597.x
  9. Straub KW, Peng ED, Hajagos BE, Tyler JS, Bradley PJ. The moving junction protein RON8 facilitates firm attachment and host cell invasion in Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog 2011;7:e1002007. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002007
  10. Besteiro S, Michelin A, Poncet J, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M. Export of a Toxoplasma gondii rhoptry neck protein complex at the host cell membrane to form the moving junction during invasion. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:e1000309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000309
  11. Lamarque M, Besteiro S, Papoin J, Roques M, Vulliez-Le Normand B, Morlon-Guyot J, et al. The RON2-AMA1 interaction is a critical step in moving junction-dependent invasion by apicomplexan parasites. PLoS Pathog 2011;7:e1001276. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1001276
  12. Henderson KA, Streltsov VA, Coley AM, Dolezal O, Hudson PJ, Batchelor AH, et al. Structure of an IgNAR-AMA1 complex: targeting a conserved hydrophobic cleft broadens malarial strain recognition. Structure 2007;15:1452-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.str.2007.09.011
  13. Crawford J, Tonkin ML, Grujic O, Boulanger MJ. Structural characterization of apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) from Toxoplasma gondii. J Biol Chem 2010;285:15644-15652. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.092619
  14. Harvey KL, Yap A, Gilson PR, Cowman AF, Crabb BS. Insights and controversies into the role of the key apicomplexan invasion ligand, apical membrane antigen 1. Int J Parasitol 2014;44:853-857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.08.001
  15. Collins CR, Withers-Martinez C, Hackett F, Blackman MJ. An inhibitory antibody blocks interactions between components of the malarial invasion machinery. PLoS Pathog 2009;5:e1000273. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1000273
  16. Richard D, MacRaild CA, Riglar DT, Chan JA, Foley M, Baum J, et al. Interaction between Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 and the rhoptry neck protein complex defines a key step in the erythrocyte invasion process of malaria parasites. J Biol Chem 2010;285:14815-14822. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M109.080770
  17. Tonkin ML, Roques M, Lamarque MH, Pugniere M, Douguet D, Crawford J, et al. Host cell invasion by apicomplexan parasites: insights from the co-structure of AMA1 with a RON2 peptide. Science 2011;333:463-467. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1204988
  18. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Halgren TA, et al. Extra precision glide: docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. J Med Chem 2006;49:6177-6196. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm051256o
  19. Lagunin A, Stepanchikova A, Filimonov D, Poroikov V. PASS: prediction of activity spectra for biologically active substances. Bioinformatics 2000;16:747-748. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/16.8.747
  20. Genheden S, Ryde U. The MM/PBSA and MM/GBSA methods to estimate ligand-binding affinities. Expert Opin Drug Discov 2015;10:449-461. https://doi.org/10.1517/17460441.2015.1032936
  21. DuBay KH, Hall ML, Hughes TF, Wu C, Reichman DR, Friesner RA. Accurate force field development for modeling conjugated polymers. J Chem Theory Comput 2012;8:4556-4569. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct300175w
  22. Barth E, Kuczera K, Leimkuhler B, Skeel RD. Algorithms for constrained molecular dynamics. J Comput Chem 1995;16:1192-1209. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540161003
  23. Bulatov VV, Rhee M, Cai W. Periodic boundary conditions for dislocation dynamics simulations in three dimensions. MRS Proc 2000;653:Z1-Z3.
  24. Harvey MJ, De Fabritiis G. An implementation of the smooth particle mesh Ewald method on GPU hardware. J Chem Theory Comput 2009;5:2371-2377. https://doi.org/10.1021/ct900275y
  25. Berendsen HJ, Postma JP, van Gunsteren WF, DiNola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys 1984;81:3684-3690. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.448118
  26. Damm KL, Carlson HA. Gaussian-weighted RMSD superposition of proteins: a structural comparison for flexible proteins and predicted protein structures. Biophys J 2006;90:4558-4573. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.105.066654
  27. Maiorov VN, Crippen GM. Significance of root-mean-square deviation in comparing three-dimensional structures of globular proteins. J Mol Biol 1994;235:625-634. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.1994.1017
  28. Fuglebakk E, Echave J, Reuter N. Measuring and comparing structural fluctuation patterns in large protein datasets. Bioinformatics 2012;28:2431-2440. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts445
  29. Lobanov MY, Bogatyreva NS, Galzitskaya OV. Radius of gyration as an indicator of protein structure compactness. Mol Biol 2008;42:623-628. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0026893308040195
  30. Srinivasan P, Beatty WL, Diouf A, Herrera R, Ambroggio X, Moch JK, et al. Binding of Plasmodium merozoite proteins RON2 and AMA1 triggers commitment to invasion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:13275-13280. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110303108
  31. Alam A. Bioinformatic identification of peptidomimetic-based inhibitors against Plasmodium falciparum antigen AMA1. Malar Res Treat 2014;2014:642391.
  32. Tonkin ML, Crawford J, Lebrun ML, Boulanger MJ. Babesia divergens and Neospora caninum apical membrane antigen 1 structures reveal selectivity and plasticity in apicomplexan parasite host cell invasion. Protein Sci 2013;22:114-127. https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2193
  33. Carugo O. How root-mean-square distance (r.m.s.d.) values depend on the resolution of protein structures that are compared. J Appl Cryst 2003;36:125-128. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889802020502
  34. Mahadevi AS, Sastry GN. Cation-${\pi}$ interaction: its role and relevance in chemistry, biology, and material science. Chem Rev 2013;113:2100-2138. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr300222d
  35. Scrutton NS, Raine AR. Cation-${\pi}$ bonding and amino-aromatic interactions in the biomolecular recognition of substituted ammonium ligands. Biochem J 1996;319:1-8. https://doi.org/10.1042/bj3190001

Cited by

  1. Probing the intermolecular interactions of PPARγ-LBD with polyunsaturated fatty acids and their anti-inflammatory metabolites to infer most potential binding moieties vol.16, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12944-016-0404-3
  2. IgG Avidity Test in Congenital Toxoplasmosis Diagnoses in Newborns vol.6, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens6020026
  3. : An integrative pharmacoinformatics approach pp.07302312, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcb.27553
  4. Characterization of a novel secretory spherical body protein in Babesia orientalis and Babesia orientalis-infected erythrocytes vol.11, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-3018-y