DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of Effects of Groundwater Pumping Near Stream Using Analytical Model

해석적 모형에 의한 하천변 지하수 양수 영향 분석

  • Lee, Jeongwoo (Korea Institute of Civil engineering and building Technology) ;
  • Chung, Il-Moon (Korea Institute of Civil engineering and building Technology) ;
  • Kim, Nam Won (Korea Institute of Civil engineering and building Technology) ;
  • Lee, Min Ho (Geum River Flood Control Office)
  • 이정우 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 정일문 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 김남원 (한국건설기술연구원 수자원.하천연구소) ;
  • 이민호 (금강홍수통제소 예보통제과)
  • Received : 2016.04.05
  • Accepted : 2016.05.10
  • Published : 2016.08.01

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the groundwater drawdown and streamflow depletion due to each groundwater pumping from 110 wells located near stream using the Hunt's analytical solution (1999). The calculated results revealed that the streamflow depletion rate divided by the pumping rate for each well location mostly exceeded about 80% of pumping rate on average for 5 years. The results also showed that the stream boundary condition has made the influence distance shorter and the drawdown distribution skewed except for the streambed hydraulic conductivity and the stream bed factor (SBF) lower than $1.0{\times}10^{-9}m/s$ and 1.0, respectively. It was found that the groundwater pumping has significant impacts on the stream depletion showing above 80 % of stream depletion rate when the streambed hydraulic conductivity is higher than $1.0{\times}10^{-7}m/s$ and the stream depletion factor(SDF) is lower than 100. However, for other conditions, the SDF is not sufficient to be used as a criterion for determining whether the pumping has great impacts on stream depletion or not. Furthermore, the variation of the streambed hydraulic conductance has little change in stream depletion rate for the condition that the stream width is greater than 400 m.

본 연구에서는 하천변에 실제로 위치한 지하수 관정 110개를 대상으로 Hunt (1999)의 해석해를 이용하여 양수로 인한 지하수위 강하 및 하천수 감소량을 산정하였다. 대상 관정 각각에 대해 양수량 대비 하천수 감소량을 산정한 결과 대부분의 관정에서 양수기간 5년 동안 평균적으로 80%를 초과하는 것으로 분석되었다. 하상수리전도도가 $1.0{\times}10^{-9}m/s$로 매우 작고 하천바닥인자(SBF)가 1 보다 작은 경우를 제외하고는 하천경계조건의 영향으로 하천방향 영향거리가 짧아져 비대칭적 지하수위 강하 분포를 크게 유발하는 것으로 나타났다. 하상수리전도도가 $1.0{\times}10^{-7}m/s$보다 크고 하천고갈인자(SDF)가 100 보다 작은 경우에는 하천수 감소율이 80 %를 초과하여 양수의 영향이 크게 발생하였으나, 그 외의 조건에 대해서는 SDF 값만으로 하천 영향의 대소를 판별하기에 한계가 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 또한 하폭이 400 m를 넘는 경우에는 하상수리전도도 변화에 따른 하천수 감소율의 변화가 크지 않는 것으로 분석되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Butler, J. J. Jr., Zhan, X. and Zlotnik, V. A. (2007). "Pumpinginduced drawdown and stream depletion in a leaky aquifer system." Ground Water, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 178-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2006.00272.x
  2. Butler, J. J. Jr., Zlotnik, V. A. and Tsou, M.-S. (2001). "Drawdown and stream depletion produced by pumping in the vicinity of a partially penetrating stream." Ground Water, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 651-659. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02354.x
  3. Calver, A. (2001). "Riverbed permeabilities: Information from pooled data." Ground Water, Vol. 39, pp. 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2001.tb02343.x
  4. Glover, R. E. and Balmer, G. G. (1954). "River depletion from pumping a well near a river." American Geophysical Union Transactions, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 468-470. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR035i003p00468
  5. Han River Flood Control Office (2011). Assessment of streamflow depletion according to groundwater withdrawals near stream, Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.
  6. Hantush, M. S. (1965). "Wells near streams with semipervious beds." Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 70, No. 12, pp. 2829-2838. https://doi.org/10.1029/JZ070i012p02829
  7. Hunt, B. (1999). "Unsteady stream depletion from ground water pumping." Ground Water, Vol. 37, No. 1, pp. 98-102. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb00962.x
  8. Hunt, B. (2003). "Unsteady stream depletion when pumping from semiconfined aquifer." Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 13-19.
  9. Hunt, B. (2009). "Stream depletion in a two-layer leaky aquifer system." Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, Vol. 14, No. 9, pp. 895-903. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000063
  10. Kim, G. B. (2010). "Application of analytical solution for stream depletion due to groundwater pumping in Gapcheon watershed, South Korea." Hydrological Processes, Vol. 24, pp. 3535-3546. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7777
  11. Lee, J., Chun, S. G., Yi, M. J., Kim, N. W., Chung, I. M. and Lee, M. H. (2015). "Measurements of streambed hydraulic conductivity using drive-point piezometers and seepage meters in the upper reaches of anseong stream." The Journal of Engineering Geology, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 1-8. https://doi.org/10.9720/kseg.2015.1.1
  12. Pattle Delamore Partners Ltd and Environment Canterbury (2000). Guidelines for the Assessment of Groundwater Abstraction Effects on Stream Flow, Environment Canterbury Technical Report R00/11.
  13. Singh, S. K. (2000). "Rate and volume of stream depletion due to pumping." Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 5, pp. 336-338. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2000)126:5(336)
  14. Singh, S. K. (2005). "Rate and volume of stream flow depletion due to unsteady pumping." Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 6, pp. 539-545. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2005)131:6(539)
  15. Theis, C. V. (1941). "The effect of a well on the flow of a nearby stream." Transactions of the American Geophysical Union, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 734-738. https://doi.org/10.1029/TR022i003p00734

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of stream depletion from groundwater pumping in shallow aquifer using the Hunt’s analytical solution vol.49, pp.11, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3741/JKWRA.2016.49.11.923
  2. Evaluation of Stream Depletion from Groundwater Pumping in Deep Aquifer Using An Analytical Model vol.36, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.12652/Ksce.2016.36.5.0769