Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health

The Korean Society for Preventive Medicine (대한예방의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Systematic Review of the Economic Evaluation of Telemedicine in Japan

  • Akiyama, Miki (Faculty of Environment and Information Studies, Keio University) ;
  • Yoo, Byung-Kwang (Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.05.04
  • Accepted : 2016.06.22
  • Published : 2016.07.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: There is no systematic review on economic evaluations of telemedicine in Japan, despite over 1000 trials implemented. Our systematic review aims to examine whether Japan's telemedicine is cost-saving or cost-effective, examine the methodological rigorousness of the economic evaluations, and discuss future studies needed to improve telemedicine's financial sustainability. Methods: We searched five databases, including two Japanese databases, to find peer-reviewed articles published between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2014 in English and Japanese that performed economic evaluations of Japan's telemedicine programs. The methodological rigorousness of the economic analyses was assessed with a well-established checklist. We calculated the benefit-to-cost ratio (BCR) when a reviewed study reported related data but did not report the BCR. All cost values were adjusted to 2014 US dollars. Results: Among the 17 articles identified, six studies reported on settings connecting physicians for specialist consultations, and eleven studies on settings connecting healthcare providers and patients at home. There are three cost-benefit analyses and three cost-minimization analyses. The remaining studies measured the benefit of telemedicine only, using medical expenditure saved or users' willingness-to-pay. There was substantial diversity in the methodological rigorousness. Studies on teledermatology and teleradiology indicated a favorable level of economic efficiency. Studies on telehomecare gave mixed results. One cost-benefit analysis on telehomecare indicated a low economic efficiency, partly due to public subsidy rules, e.g., a too short budget period. Conclusions: Overall, telemedicine programs in Japan were indicated to have a favorable level of economic efficiency. However, the scarcity of the economic literature indicates the need for further rigorous economic evaluation studies.

Keywords

References

  1. American Telemedicine Association. What is telemedicine? [cited 2015 Oct 30]. Available from: http://www.american-telemed.org/about-telemedicine/what-is-telemedicine#.
  2. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S. Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform 2010; 79(11):736-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006
  3. Spek V, Cuijpers P, Nyklicek I, Riper H, Keyzer J, Pop V. Internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy for symptoms of depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis. Psychol Med 2007;37(3): 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291706008944
  4. Reger MA, Gahm GA. A meta-analysis of the effects of internet- and computer-based cognitive-behavioral treatments for anxiety. J Clin Psychol 2009;65(1):53-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20536
  5. Hyler SE, Gangure DP, Batchelder ST. Can telepsychiatry replace in-person psychiatric assessments? A review and meta-analysis of comparison studies. CNS Spectr 2005;10(5):403-413. https://doi.org/10.1017/S109285290002277X
  6. Polisena J, Tran K, Cimon K, Hutton B, McGill S, Palmer K, et al. Home telehealth for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 2010;16(3):120-127. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090812
  7. Gaikwad R, Warren J. The role of home-based information and communications technology interventions in chronic disease management: a systematic literature review. Health Informatics J 2009;15(2):122-146. https://doi.org/10.1177/1460458209102973
  8. Martinez A, Everss E, Rojo-Alvarez JL, Figal DP, Garcia-Alberola A. A systematic review of the literature on home monitoring for patients with heart failure. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(5): 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763306777889109
  9. Barlow J, Singh D, Bayer S, Curry R. A systematic review of the benefits of home telecare for frail elderly people and those with long-term conditions. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13(4): 172-179. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763307780908058
  10. Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of "smart home" applications. Yearb Med Inform 2008:33-40.
  11. Mistry H. Systematic review of studies of the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine and telecare. Changes in the economic evidence over twenty years. J Telemed Telecare 2012;18(1):1-6. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2011.110505
  12. Mistry H, Garnvwa H, Oppong R. Critical appraisal of published systematic reviews assessing the cost-effectiveness of telemedicine studies. Telemed J E Health 2014;20(7):609-618. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2013.0259
  13. Wade VA, Karnon J, Elshaug AG, Hiller JE. A systematic review of economic analyses of telehealth services using real time video communication. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10:233. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-10-233
  14. de la Torre-Diez I, Lopez-Coronado M, Vaca C, Aguado JS, de Castro C. Cost-utility and cost-effectiveness studies of telemedicine, electronic, and mobile health systems in the literature: a systematic review. Telemed J E Health 2015;21(2):81-85. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2014.0053
  15. Broens TH, Huis in’t Veld RM, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ, van Halteren AT, Nieuwenhuis LJ. Determinants of successful telemedicine implementations: a literature study. J Telemed Telecare 2007;13(6):303-309. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763307781644951
  16. Brebner JA, Brebner EM, Ruddick-Bracken H. Experience-based guidelines for the implementation of telemedicine services. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:3-5. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X0501100102
  17. Tinker A, Lansley P. Introducing assistive technology into the existing homes of older people: feasibility, acceptability, costs and outcomes. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:1-3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X0501100101
  18. Malasanos TH, Burlingame JB, Youngblade L, Patel BD, Muir AB. Improved access to subspecialist diabetes care by telemedicine: cost savings and care measures in the first two years of the FITE diabetes project. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:74-76. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633054461624
  19. Bratan T, Clarke M, Jones R, Larkworthy A, Paul R. Evaluation of the practical feasibility and acceptability of home monitoring in residential homes. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:29-31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X0501100107
  20. Aas IH, Geitung JT. Teleradiology and picture archiving and communications systems: changed pattern of communication between clinicians and radiologists. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:20-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X0501100105
  21. Vitacca M, Mazzu M, Scalvini S. Socio-technical and organizational challenges to wider e-Health implementation. Chron Respir Dis 2009;6(2):91-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1479972309102805
  22. Kavamoto CA, Wen CL, Battistella LR, Bohm GM. A Brazilian model of distance education in physical medicine and rehabilitation based on videoconferencing and Internet learning. J Telemed Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:80-82. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633054461949
  23. Scalvini S, Capomolla S, Zanelli E, Benigno M, Domenighini D, Paletta L, et al. Effect of home-based telecardiology on chronic heart failure: costs and outcomes. J Telemed Telecare 2005; 11 Suppl 1:16-18.
  24. Vontetsianos T, Giovas P, Katsaras T, Rigopoulou A, Mpirmpa G, Giaboudakis P, et al. Telemedicine-assisted home support for patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: preliminary results after nine-month follow-up. J Tele- med Telecare 2005;11 Suppl 1:86-88.
  25. Statistics Bureau of Japan. Consumer price index (GL08 020103); 2015 [cited 2015 Dec 26]. Available from: http://www.e-stat.go.jp/SG1/estat/List.do?bid=000001033700&cycode=0 (Japanese).
  26. Hasegawa T, Murase S. Distribution of telemedicine in Japan. Telemed J E Health 2007;13(6):695-702. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2007.0013
  27. Akematsu Y, Tsuji M. Empirical analysis of home healthcare system and cost of four major life-related diseases. Jpn J Telemed Telecare 2010;6(2):171-174 (Japanese).
  28. Dávalos ME, French MT, Burdick AE, Simmons SC. Economic evaluation of telemedicine: review of the literature and research guidelines for benefit-cost analysis. Telemed J E Health 2009;15(10):933-948. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2009.0067
  29. Gagnon MP, Legare F, Labrecque M, Fremont P, Pluye P, Gagnon J, et al. Interventions for promoting information and communication technologies adoption in healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;(1):CD006093.
  30. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, Helfand M. Telemedicine for the medicare population: update. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006;(131):1-41.
  31. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Claxton K, Stoddart GL, Torrance GW. Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015, p. 42-44.
  32. Drummond MF, Jefferson TO. Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ. The BMJ Economic Evaluation Working Party. BMJ 1996;313(7052):275-283. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275
  33. Higgins JP, Green S; Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0: 15.5.2 critical appraisal of methodological quality; 2011 [cited 2016 Jun 6]. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/chapter_15/15_5_2_critical_appraisal_of_methodological_quality.htm.
  34. Hashimoto S, Shirato H, Kaneko K, Ooshio W, Nishioka T, Miyasaka K. Clinical efficacy of telemedicine in emergency radiotherapy for malignant spinal cord compression. J Digit Imaging 2001;14(3):124-130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-001-0011-2
  35. Dekio I, Hanada E, Chinuki Y, Akaki T, Kitani M, Shiraishi Y, et al. Usefulness and economic evaluation of ADSL-based live interactive teledermatology in areas with shortage of dermatologists. Int J Dermatol 2010;49(11):1272-1275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04572.x
  36. Aoki N, Ohta S, Yamamoto H, Kikuchi N, Dunn K. Triangulation analysis of tele-palliative care implementation in a rural community area in Japan. Telemed J E Health 2006;12(6):655-662. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.12.655
  37. Takada A, Kasahara T, Kinosada Y, Hosoba M, Nishimura T. Economic impact of real-time teleradiology in thoracic CT examinations. Eur Radiol 2003;13(7):1566-1570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-002-1684-8
  38. Miyahara S, Tsuji M, Iizuka C, Hasegawa T, Taoka F. On the evaluation of economic benefits of Japanese telemedicine and factors for its promotion. Telemed J E Health 2006;12(6): 691-697. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2006.12.691
  39. Tsuji M, Miyahara S, Taoka F, Iizuka C, Teshima M. An empirical analysis of economic evaluation of Japanese teleradiology and telepathology. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Healthcom 2006: Proceedings of 8th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services; 2006 Aug 17-19; New Delhi, India. Piscataway: IEEE; 2006, p. 60-65.
  40. Tsuji M, Suzuki W, Taoka F. An economic evaluation of the Japanese telehealth system by CVM: comparison of four regions. In: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. Healthcom 2003: Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Enterprise Networking and Computing in Healthcare Industry: 2003 Jun 6-7; Santa Monica, CA, USA. Piscataway: IEEE; 2003; p. 24-28.
  41. Tsuji M, Suzuki W, Taoka F. An empirical analysis of a telehealth system in terms of cost-sharing. J Telemed Telecare 2003;9 Suppl 1:S41-S43. https://doi.org/10.1258/135763303322196303
  42. Homma S, Sone M, Kurose I, Homma R, Nagare T. Clinical efficacy of a telemedicine program for lifestyle modification involving self-monitoring of health status, and patient compliance with it. Ningen Dock 2012;27(1):97-102 (Japanese).
  43. Akematsu Y, Tsuji M. An empirical analysis of the reduction in medical expenditure by e-health users. J Telemed Telecare 2009;15(3):109-111. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.003001
  44. Akematsu Y, Tsuji M. Measuring the effect of telecare on medical expenditures without bias using the propensity score matching method. Telemed J E Health 2012;18(10):743-747. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2012.0019
  45. Akematsu Y, Nitta S, Morita K, Tsuji M. Empirical analysis of the long-term effects of telecare use in Nishi-aizu Town, Fukushima Prefecture, Japan. Technol Health Care 2013;21(2):173-182.
  46. Ito Y, Suzuki W, Tsuji M, Kamata H, Taoka F, Osaka H. Regional comparative study of home health care: based on a survey on Kamaishi city and Nishiaizu town. Jpn J Med Inform 2003;23 (4):313-323 (Japanese).
  47. Osaka H, Kamata H. Influence of user attributes on the effect of home tele-care system. J Iwate Med Assoc 2003;55(5):323-331 (Japanese).
  48. Tsuji M, Suzuki W, Taoka F, Kamata H, Osaka H, Teshima M. An empirical analysis of the assessment of the tele-home-care system and burden of costs: based on a survey on Kamaishi city. Jpn J Med Inform 2002;22(1):79-86 (Japanese).
  49. Tanikawa T, Ohba H, Ogasawara K, Sakurai T. Willingness to pay for the use of tele-consultations in pediatric emergency care. J Jpn Soc Healthcare Admin 2010;47(2):81-91 (Japanese).
  50. Fitzpatrick D, Grabarz D, Wang L, Bezjak A, Fehlings MG, Fosker C, et al. How effective is a virtual consultation process in facilitating multidisciplinary decision-making for malignant epidural spinal cord compression? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012;84(2):e167-e172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.03.057
  51. Chan HH, Woo J, Chan WM, Hjelm M. Teledermatology in Hong Kong: a cost-effective method to provide service to the elderly patients living in institutions. Int J Dermatol 2000;39 (10):774-778. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-4362.2000.00034.x
  52. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Evans C, Hicks N, et al. A randomized controlled trial assessing the health economics of realtime teledermatology compared with conventional care: an urban versus rural perspective. J Telemed Telecare 2001;7(2):108-118. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633011936246
  53. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. A randomized controlled trial to assess the clinical effectiveness of both realtime and store-and-forward teledermatology compared with conventional care. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6 Suppl 1:S1-S3.
  54. Loane MA, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. A comparison of real-time and store-and-forward teledermatology: a cost-benefit study. Br J Dermatol 2000;143(6): 1241-1247. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2133.2000.03895.x
  55. Wootton R, Bloomer SE, Corbett R, Eedy DJ, Hicks N, Lotery HE, et al. Multicentre randomised control trial comparing real time teledermatology with conventional outpatient dermatological care: societal cost-benefit analysis. BMJ 2000;320 (7244):1252-1256. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1252
  56. Doolittle GC. A cost measurement study for a home-based telehospice service. J Telemed Telecare 2000;6 Suppl 1:S193-S195.
  57. Doolittle GC, Whitten P, McCartney M, Cook D, Nazir N. An empirical chart analysis of the suitability of telemedicine for hospice visits. Telemed J E Health 2005;11(1):90-97. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2005.11.90
  58. Oliver DP, Demiris G, Wittenberg-Lyles E, Washington K, Day T, Novak H. A systematic review of the evidence base for telehospice. Telemed J E Health 2012;18(1):38-47. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2011.0061
  59. Hebert MA, Jansen JJ, Brant R, Hailey D, van der Pol M. Successes and challenges in a field-based, multi-method study of home telehealth. J Telemed Telecare 2004;10 Suppl 1:41-44. https://doi.org/10.1258/1357633042614348
  60. Bensink ME, Armfield NR, Pinkerton R, Irving H, Hallahan AR, Theodoros DG, et al. Using videotelephony to support paediatric oncology-related palliative care in the home: from abandoned RCT to acceptability study. Palliat Med 2009;23(3):228-237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216308100251
  61. Russell LB, Gold MR, Siegel JE, Daniels N, Weinstein MC. The role of cost-effectiveness analysis in health and medicine. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996;276(14):1172-1177. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540140060028
  62. Siegel JE, Weinstein MC, Russell LB, Gold MR. Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996;276(16): 1339-1341. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034
  63. Weinstein MC, Siegel JE, Gold MR, Kamlet MS, Russell LB. Recommendations of the Panel on Cost-effectiveness in Health and Medicine. JAMA 1996;276(15):1253-1258. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1996.03540150055031
  64. Yang NH, Dharmar M, Yoo BK, Leigh JP, Kuppermann N, Romano PS, et al. Economic evaluation of pediatric telemedicine consultations to rural emergency departments. Med Decis Making 2015;35(6):773-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X15584916
  65. Yoo BK, Kim M, Sasaki T, Melnikow J, Marcin JP. Economic evaluation of telemedicine for patients in ICUs. Crit Care Med 2016;44(2):265-274.
  66. Lee CP, Chertow GM, Zenios SA. An empiric estimate of the value of life: updating the renal dialysis cost-effectiveness standard. Value Health 2009;12(1):80-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00401.x

Cited by

  1. The use of telemedicine for delivering healthcare in Japan: Systematic review of literature published in Japanese and English languages vol.23, pp.10, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633x17732801
  2. Comparison between High- and Low-Cost Transmission of Tele-Anesthesia in Japan vol.2018, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9615264
  3. Addressing cost and time barriers in chronic disease management through telemedicine: an exploratory research in select low- and middle-income countries vol.10, pp.None, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1177/2040622319891587
  4. Feasibility of support vector machine learning in age‐related macular degeneration using small sample yielding sparse optical coherence tomography data vol.97, pp.5, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14055
  5. Exploring the Impact of a Telehealth Care System on Organizational Capabilities and Organizational Performance from a Resource-Based Perspective vol.16, pp.20, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16203988
  6. A Multicenter Case-Historical Control Study on Short-Term Outcomes of Tele-Intensive Care Unit vol.26, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2019.0042
  7. Understanding Medical Students’ Attitudes Toward Learning eHealth: Questionnaire Study vol.6, pp.2, 2020, https://doi.org/10.2196/17030
  8. Telemedicine in the OECD: An umbrella review of clinical and cost-effectiveness, patient experience and implementation vol.15, pp.8, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237585
  9. A new telestroke network system in northern area of Okayama prefecture vol.9, pp.2, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/ncn3.12475
  10. Knowledge Update on the Economic Evaluation of Pacemaker Telemonitoring Systems vol.18, pp.22, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212120
  11. Economic Aspects of Delivering Primary Care Services: An Evidence Synthesis to Inform Policy and Research Priorities vol.99, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12536