DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effect of Insulin Supplement on Development of Porcine Parthenogenetic Embryos

  • Yu, Youngkwang (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Roy, Pantu Kumar (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Min, Kyuhong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Na, Seungwon (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Lee, Euncheol (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Ghangyong (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Fang, Xun (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Salih, MB (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Cho, Jongki (College of Veterinary Medicine, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.06.24
  • Accepted : 2016.06.26
  • Published : 2016.07.01

Abstract

This study is performed to evaluate the effect of insulin in the porcine parthenogenetic embryo development. In porcine embryo culture, insulin is helpful factor in the process of embryo development. To identify this, insulin is used in pig embryos development. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate the effect of insulin on early embryonic development in pigs. For that, insulin positive or negative (0, 10 ug/mL) was supplemented in the porcine IVM media and then compared two groups divided by the cytoplasm of the black groups and white ring groups based on the distribution of lipid material of the cell cytoplasm in microscope. In maturation rates of porcine oocytes, significant higher black group rates were shown in the insulin positive groups compared with other groups ($56.0{\pm}2.1$ vs $46.2{\pm}0.3$). In the embryo culture, black groups were showed the significant higher cleavage rates ($82.1{\pm}0.8$, $78.3{\pm}0.1$ vs $63.2{\pm}0.3$, $63.4{\pm}0.0$), and blastocyst formation rates ($15.5{\pm}3.6$, $16.6{\pm}0.4$ vs $11.7{\pm}1.3$, $7.4{\pm}0.2$) regardless of whether the addition of insulin. Also, black groups were showed higher cell number of blastocyst ($33.2{\pm}2.5$, $35.5{\pm}2.6$ vs $31.2{\pm}2.1$, $31.3{\pm}2.2$). In conclusion, supplement of insulin producing black group in vitro maturation, it was effective in vitro maturation and embryonic development of pig embryos.

Keywords

References

  1. Adamiak SJ, Mackie K, Watt RG, Webb R, Sinclair KD. 2005. Impact of nutrition on oocyte quality: Cumulative effects of body composition and diet leading to hyperinsulinemia in cattle. Biol Reprod 73: 918-26 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.105.041483
  2. Biswas D, Jung EM, Jeung EB, Hyun SH. 2011. Effects of vascular endothelial growth factor on porcine preimplantation embryos produced by in vitro fertilization and somatic cell nuclear transfer. Theriogenology 75: 256-67 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.08.012
  3. Dadi TD, Li MW, Lloyd KCK. 2007. EGF and TGF-alpha supplementation enhances development of cloned mouse embryos. Cloning Stem Cells 9: 315-26 https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2006.0040
  4. Day BA. 1993. Political Dissent and Napoleonic Representations during the Restoration Monarchy. Hist Reflections 19: 409-32
  5. Freret S, Grimard B, Ponter AA, Joly C, Ponsart C, Humblot P. 2006. Reduction of body-weight gain enhances in vitro embryo production in overfed superovulated dairy heifers. Reproduction 131: 783-94 https://doi.org/10.1530/rep.1.00689
  6. Gupta MK, Uhm SJ, Lee SH, Lee HT. 2008. Role of nonessential amino acids on porcine embryos produced by parthenogenesis or somatic cell nuclear transfer. Mol Reprod Dev 75: 588-97 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20789
  7. Han ZM, Vassena R, Chi MMY, Potireddy S, Sutovsky M, et al. 2008. Role of glucose in cloned mouse embryo development. Am J Physiol-Endoc M 295: E798-E809
  8. Hartshorne GM, Barlow A, Child TJ, Kennedy CR, Barlow DH, Hulten MA. 1997. Identification of meiotic cells in cultures of human fetal ovarian tissue. Hum Reprod 12: P177-P77
  9. Hernandez ER, Resnick CE, Svoboda ME, Vanwyk JJ, Payne DW, Adashi EY. 1988. Somatomedin-C Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I as an Enhancer of Androgen Biosynthesis by Cultured Rat Ovarian-Cells. Endocrinology 122: 1603-12 https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-122-4-1603
  10. Himaki T, Mizobe Y, Tsuda K, Suetomo M, Yamakuchi H, et al. 2012. Effect of Postactivation Treatment with Latrunculin A on In Vitro and In Vivo Development of Cloned Embryos Derived from Kidney Fibroblasts of an Aged Clawn Miniature Boar. J Reprod Develop 58: 398-403 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.11-083A
  11. Kolle S, Stojkovic M, Boie G, Wolf E, Sinowatz F. 2003. Growth hormone-related effects on apoptosis, mitosis, and expression of connexin 43 in bovine in vitro maturation cumulus-oocyte complexes. Biol Reprod 68: 1584-89 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.010264
  12. Landau S, Braw-Tal R, Kaim M, Bor A, Bruckental I. 2000. Preovulatory follicular status and diet affect the insulin and glucose content of follicles in high-yielding dairy cows. Anim Reprod Sci 64: 181-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4320(00)00212-8
  13. Lee GS, Kim HS, Hyun SH, Kim DY, Lee SH, et al. 2003. Improved developmental competence of cloned porcine embryos with different energy supplements and chemical activation. Mol Reprod Dev 66: 17-23 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.10329
  14. Lee SH, Kim DY, Nam DH, Hyun SH, Lee GS, et al. 2004. Role of messenger RNA expression of platelet activating factor and its receptor in porcine in vitro-fertilized and cloned embryo development. Biol Reprod 71: 919-25 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.103.026138
  15. Lunney JK. 2007. Advances in swine biomedical model genomics. Int J Biol Sci 3: 179-84
  16. Masui Y. 2001. From oocyte maturation to the in vitro cell cycle: the history of discoveries of Maturation-Promoting Factor (MPF) and Cytostatic Factor (CSF). Differentiation 69: 1-17 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.690101.x
  17. Nurse P. 1990. Universal Control Mechanism Regulating Onset of M-Phase. Nature 344: 503-08 https://doi.org/10.1038/344503a0
  18. ONeill C. 1997. Evidence for the requirement of autocrine growth factors for development of mouse preimplantation embryos in vitro. Biol Reprod 56: 229-37 https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod56.1.229
  19. Pandey A, Gupta SC, Gupta N. 2009. EFFECT OF DIFFERENT CULTURE MEDIUM ON THE PRODUCTION OF GRANULOSA SCNT EMBRYOS IN WATER BUFFALO (BUBALUS BUBALIS) AND THEIR mRNA TRANSCRIPT ANALYSIS AT DEVELOPMENTAL STAGES IN COMPARISON WITH IN VITRO FERTILIZATION-PRODUCED EMBRYOS. Reprod Fert Develop 21: 194-95
  20. Salahuddin S, Ookutsu S, Goto K, Nakanishi Y, Nagata Y. 1995. Effects of Embryo Density and Coculture of Unfertilized Oocytes on Embryonic-Development of in-Vitro Fertilized Mouse Embryos. Hum Reprod 10: 2382-85 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136303
  21. Sjaastad I, Schiander I, Sjetnan A, Qvigstad E, Bokenes J, et al. 2003. Increased contribution of alpha(1) vs. beta-adrenoceptor-mediated inotropic response in rats with congestive heart failure. Acta Physiol Scand 177: 449-58 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-201X.2003.01063.x
  22. Song K, Hyun SH, Shin T, Lee E. 2009. Post-Activation Treatment With Demecolcine Improves Development of Somatic Cell Nuclear Transfer Embryos in Pigs by Modifying the Remodeling of Donor Nuclei. Mol Reprod Dev 76: 611-19 https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.20989
  23. Spicer LJ, Echternkamp SE. 1995. The Ovarian Insulin and Insulin-Like Growth-Factor System with an Emphasis on Domestic-Animals. Domest Anim Endocrin 12: 223-45 https://doi.org/10.1016/0739-7240(95)00021-6
  24. Sugimura S, Yamanaka K, Kawahara M, Wakai T, Yokoo M, Sato E. 2010. Early metaphase II oocytes treated with dibutyryl cyclic adenosine monophosphate provide suitable recipient cytoplasm for the production of miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. Anim Sci J 81: 48-57 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-0929.2009.00705.x
  25. Taieb F, Thibier C, Jessus C. 1997. On cyclins, oocytes, and eggs. Mol Reprod Dev 48: 397-411 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2795(199711)48:3<397::AID-MRD14>3.0.CO;2-T
  26. Thirthagiri E, Cheong LS, Yip CH, Teo SH. 2009. CHEK2*1100delC does not contribute to risk to breast cancer among Malay, Chinese and Indians in Malaysia. Fam Cancer 8: 355-58 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-009-9244-x
  27. van den Hurk R, Zhao H. 2005. Formation of mammalian oocytes and their growth, differentiation and maturation within ovarian follicles. Theriogenology 63: 1717-51 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theriogenology.2004.08.005
  28. Vutyavanich T, Saeng-anan U, Sirisukkasem S, Piromlertamorn W. 2011. Effect of embryo density and microdrop volume on the blastocyst development of mouse two-cell embryos. Fertil Steril 95: 1435-39 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.005
  29. Wadhwa N, Kunj N, Tiwari S, Saraiya M, Majumdar SS. 2009. Optimization of embryo culture conditions for increasing efficiency of cloning in buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) and generation of transgenic embryos via cloning. Cloning Stem Cells 11: 387-95 https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2009.0003
  30. Wakai T, Sugimura S, Yamanaka KI, Kawahara M, Sasada H, et al. 2008. Production of viable cloned miniature pig embryos using oocytes derived from domestic pig ovaries. Cloning Stem Cells 10: 249-61 https://doi.org/10.1089/clo.2007.0045
  31. Wilmut I, Schnieke AE, McWhir J, Kind AJ, Campbell KHS. 1997. Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells. Nature 385: 810-13 https://doi.org/10.1038/385810a0
  32. Yamanaka K, Sugimura S, Wakai T, Kawahara M, Sato E. 2009. Difference in sensitivity to culture condition between in vitro fertilized and somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos in pigs. J Reprod Dev 55: 299-304 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.20174
  33. Yamanaka K, Sugimura S, Wakai T, Shoji T, Kobayashi J, et al. 2007. Effect of activation treatments on actin filament distribution and in vitro development of miniature pig somatic cell nuclear transfer embryos. J Reprod Dev 53: 791-800 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.18162
  34. Yoshioka K. 2011. Development and Application of a Chemically Defined Medium for the In Vitro Production of Porcine Embryos. J Reprod Develop 57: 9-16 https://doi.org/10.1262/jrd.10-196E