DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of Slope Criteria and Forestland Restoration Plan in North Korea

북한의 산림복원계획과 기준 경사도 고찰

  • 유재심 (충남대학교 산림환경자원학과) ;
  • 박현 (국립산림과학원 국제산림연구과) ;
  • 이상혁 (충남대학교 산림환경자원학과) ;
  • 김경민 (국립산림과학원 국제산림연구과)
  • Received : 2016.03.30
  • Accepted : 2016.08.25
  • Published : 2016.08.31

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to establish the slope criteria and analyze the forest land restoration plan in North Korea. Reviewing the literature of the countries, the relationships among the climate, erosion controls, and slope criteria with forest restoration programmes, implemented were analyzed. Comparison of forest land management policies was conducted between South and North Korea. The soil erosion controls using biological barriers were at $15{\sim}20^{\circ}$slopes in arid climate regions and $25{\sim}30^{\circ}$ in humid climate regions. In the case of South Korea, an afforestation policy from the "Act on Clearance Project of Slash-and Burn Agriculture" of 1966 was enforced on mountains with slope greater than $20^{\circ}$, however, at present, the "Marginal Cropping Land Policy" recommends cropping lands with slope bigger than $8.5^{\circ}$ to forest land. In 1961, in "Land Reclamation of One Million Hectare", North Korea reclaimed additional cropping lands with slope bigger than $8.5^{\circ}$, and currently, the "Act on Forestry" states to enforce reforestation with slope bigger than $20^{\circ}$. This study recommends that South Korea aids for forest land restoration in North Korea based on the different stages of their development on reconciliation and cooperation between South and North Korea.

Keywords

References

  1. Banda AZ.Maghembe JA.Ngugi DN and Chome VA. 1994. Effect of intercropping maize and closely spaced Leucaena hedgerows on soil conservation and maize yield on a steep slope at Ntcheu, Malawi. Agroforestry Systems 27: 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00704831
  2. Bannister ME and Nair PKR. 1990. Alley cropping as a sustainable agricultural technology for the hillsides of Haiti: Experience of an agroforestry outreach project. Americann Journal of Alternative Agriculture 5(2): 51-59. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0889189300003283
  3. Hurni H. 1983. Soil erosion and soil formation in agricultural ecosystems: Ethiopia and Northern Thailand, Mountain Research and Development. 3(2): 131-142. https://doi.org/10.2307/3672994
  4. Jakob M and Jordan P. 2001. Design flood estimates in mountain streams-the need for a geomorphic approach, Can. J. Civil Engin. 28: 425-439.
  5. Korea Land Corporation. 2000. Reunification and Land. Winter Issue. Seoul, Korea
  6. Lager B. 2015. Agroforestry is taking root in North korea. Available online at http://www.siani.se
  7. Lee BS and Kim YT. 2010. Encyclopedia of Agricultural data base, General Agriculture Publishing. Pyongyang, DPRK.
  8. Lee YJ and Lee CM. 2013. A study on evaluation of factors effecting landslide, Forest Science. 2013(3): 11-14
  9. Lundgren L. 1980. Comparison of surface runoff and soil loss from runoff plots in forest and small-scale agriculture in the Usambara mountain, Tanzania. Geografiska Annaler, (62A): 113-148
  10. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. 2001. Report on farmland survey in agricultureforest interaction area. Seoul, Korea
  11. Ministry of Environment. 2010. Basic research for soil erosion diminish. p.75. Seoul.
  12. MoLEP(Ministry of Land and Environment Protection). 2015. DPRK National Agroforestry Strategy and Action Plan (2015-2024).
  13. MoLEP and SDC. 2014. Ten years of sloping land management, General Industry Publishing. Pyongyang(SDC office in DPRK)
  14. Monsieurs E.Dessie M.Adgo E.Poesen J. Deckers J.Verhoest N and Nyssen J. 2014. Seasonal surface drainage of sloping farmland: A review of its hydrogeomorphic impacts, Land Degradation & Development, 26(1): 35-44 https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.2286
  15. Oh JH.You JH.Kim KT and Lee WS. 2011. Risk assessment of soil erosion in Gyeongju using RUSLE Method, J. Environ. Impact Assess., 20(3): 313-324.
  16. Okou FAY.Assogbadjo AE.Bachmann Y. Shinsin B. 2014. Ecological Factors Influencing Physical Soil Degradation in the Atacora Mountain Chain in Benin, West Africa. Mountain Research and Development, 34(1): 157-166. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-13-00030.1
  17. Pantic M. 2005. Delineation of mountains and mountain areas in Europe - A Planning approach, J. Geogr. Inst. Cvijic., 65(1): 43-58.
  18. Park SJ.Joo WY and Lee SY. 2015. An analysis of the relationship between environmental factors and landslide hazard in Korea, The Geographical Journal of Korea. 49(2); 2015, 267-285.
  19. Sekhar NU. 2007. Traditional versus improved agroforestry system in Vietnam: A comparison, Lnad Degrad. Develop. 18: 89-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.758
  20. Shen Z.Yin R and Qi J. 2009. Land cover changes in Northeast China from the late 1970s to 2004. in An Intergraded assessment of China's ecological restoration programs, Springer in Dordrecht Heidelberg, London, New York.
  21. Turkelboom F. and Wangchuk T. 2002. A participatory and multi-scale diagnosis for developing a soil conservation strategy for Eastern Bhutan. 12th ISCO Conference 67-73. Beijing 2002.
  22. UNCCD. 2006. National report on the implementation of UNCCD: Combating land degradation and promoting sustainable land resource management in Malaysia. Malaysia. 7 February 2006.
  23. UNEP. 2010. Forest definition and extent.
  24. Wiersum KF. 1982. Tree gardening and taungya on Java: Examples of agroforestry techniques in the humid tropics, Agrofor estry Systems. 1: 53-70. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00044329
  25. Xu J.Yin RR.Li Z and Liu C. 2006. China's ecological rehabilitation: unprecedented efforets, dramatic impacts, and requisite policies, Ecological Economics, 57(4): 595- 607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.008
  26. Xu J.Noordwijk M.He J.Kim KJ.Jo RS . Pak KG.Kye UH.Kim JS.Kim KM . Sim YN.Pak JU.Song KU.Jong YS . Kim KC.Pang CJ and Ho MH. 2012. Participatory agroforestry development for restoring degra- ded sloping land in DPR Korea. Agroforestry Syst(85); 291-303
  27. Young A. 1989. Agroforestry for soil conservation, ISBN 0 85198 648 X, London
  28. Yu JS and Kim KM. 2015. Principal component analysis based ecosystem differences between South and North Korea using multivariate spatial environmental variables, J. Korean Env. Res. Tech., 18(4): 15-27.
  29. Yin R.Rothstein D.Qi J and Liu S. 2009. Methodology for an intergrative assessment of China's ecological restoration programs. in An Intergraded assessment of China's ecological restoration programs, Springer in Dordrecht Heidelberg, London, New York.

Cited by

  1. 북한의 사방공학 분야 연구동향 분석 vol.108, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14578/jkfs.2019.108.4.469
  2. A Study on the Application of Successful Forest Greening Experience for Forest and Landscape Restoration: A Comparative Study of Two Koreas vol.12, pp.20, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208712
  3. Analysis of Land Use and Land Cover Change Using Time-Series Data and Random Forest in North Korea vol.13, pp.17, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173501