DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative assessment on the influences of effluents from conventional activated sludge and biological nutrient removal processes on algal bloom in receiving waters

  • Park, Chul (Dept. Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst) ;
  • Sheppard, Diane (Dept. Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst) ;
  • Yu, Dongke (Dept. Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst) ;
  • Dolan, Sona (Dept. Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst) ;
  • Eom, Heonseop (Dept. Civil & Environmental Engineering, University of Massachusetts Amherst) ;
  • Brooks, Jane (Springfield Water and Sewer Commission) ;
  • Borgatti, Douglas (Springfield Water and Sewer Commission)
  • 투고 : 2015.12.09
  • 심사 : 2016.04.21
  • 발행 : 2016.09.30

초록

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of effluents from conventional activated sludge (CAS) and biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes on algal bloom in receiving waters. We made multiple effluent sampling from one CAS and two BNR facilities, characterized their effluents, and conducted bioassay using river and ocean water. The bioassay results showed that CAS effluents brought similar productivity in both river and ocean water, while BNR effluents were more reactive and productive in ocean water. Unexpectedly, nitrogen-based biomass yields in ocean water were up to six times larger for BNR effluents than CAS effluent. These results indicated that nitrogen in BNR effluents, although its total concentration is lower than that of CAS effluent, is more reactive and productive in ocean water. The ocean water bioassay further revealed that effluents of BNR and CAS led to considerably different phytoplankton community, indicating that different characteristics of effluents could also result in different types of algal bloom in receiving waters. The present study suggests that effects of upgrading CAS to BNR processes on algal bloom in receiving waters, especially in estuary and ocean, should be further examined.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. O'Shea ML, Brosnan TM. Trends in indicators of eutrophication in Western Long Island Sound and the Hudson-Raritan Estuary. Estuaries 2000;23:877-901. https://doi.org/10.2307/1353004
  2. U.S. EPA, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Managing common estuarine environmental problems. Retrieved July 27, 2011, from http://water.epa.gov/type/oceb/nep/about4.cfm; 2011.
  3. Stelloh T. 671M later, no clear picture of Sound's health. The Advocate; 2007. p. 1 A4.
  4. Suter EA, Lwiza KMM, Rose JM, Gobler C, Taylor GT. Phytoplankton assemblage changes during decadal decreases in nitrogen loadings to the urbanized Long Island Sound estuary, USA. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2014;497:51-67. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps10602
  5. Grady CPL, Daigger GT, Lim HC. Biological wastewater treatment. 2nd Ed., Marcel Dekker, Inc. New York, NY; 1999.
  6. Pehlivanoglu E, Sedlak DL. Bioavailability of wastewater-derived organic nitrogen to the alga Selenastrum Capricornutum. Water Res. 2004;38:3189-3196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.04.027
  7. Urgun-Demirtas M, Sattayatewa C, Pagilla KR. Bioavailability of dissolved organic nitrogen in treated Effluents. Water Environ. Res. 2008;80:397-406. https://doi.org/10.2175/106143007X221454
  8. Westgate PJ, Park C. Evaluation of proteins and organic nitrogen in wastewater treatment effluents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:5352-5357. https://doi.org/10.1021/es100244s
  9. Berman T. Dissolved organic nitrogen utilization by an Aphanizomenon bloom in lake Kinneret. J. Plankton Res. 1997;19:577-586. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/19.5.577
  10. Berman T, Chava S. Algal growth on organic compounds as nitrogen sources. J. Plankton Res.1999;21:1423-1437. https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/21.8.1423
  11. Bronk DA, See JH, Bradley P, Killberg L. DON as a source of bioavailable nitrogen for phytoplankton. Biogeosciences 2007;4:283-296. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-4-283-2007
  12. Armbrust EV, Berges JA, Bowler C, et al. The genome of the diatom Thalassiosira Pseudonana: ecology, evolution, and metabolism, Science 2004;306:79-86. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1101156
  13. Glibert PM, Heil CA, Hollander D, et al. Evidence for dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphorus uptake during a cyanobacterial bloom in Florida Bay. Mar. Ecol.-Prog. Ser. 2004;280:73-83. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps280073
  14. Eom H. Investigation of effluent nitrogen derived from conventional activated sludge (CAS) and biological nutrient removal (BNR) systems and its impact on algal growth in receiving waters. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA, USA; 2016.
  15. APHA. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C., USA; 2005.
  16. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurements with the folin phenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 1951;193:265-275.
  17. Frolund B, Griebe T, Nielsen PH. Enzymatic activity in the activated sludge floc matrix. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 1995;43:755-761. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00164784
  18. Bronk DA, Roberts QN, Sanderson MP, et al. Effluent organic nitrogen (EON): bioavailability and photochemical and salinity-mediated release. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010;44:5830-5835. https://doi.org/10.1021/es101115g

피인용 문헌

  1. Formation of Low-Molecular-Weight Dissolved Organic Nitrogen in Predenitrification Biological Nutrient Removal Systems and Its Impact on Eutrophication in Coastal Waters vol.51, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b06576