International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering

The Society of Naval Architects of Korea (대한조선학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the key performance indicator of the dynamic positioning system

  • Park, Kwang-Phil (Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., LTD.) ;
  • Jo, A-Ra (Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., LTD.) ;
  • Choi, Jin-Woo (Daewoo Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering Co., LTD.)
  • Received : 2014.12.30
  • Accepted : 2016.04.12
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The dynamic positioning system (DPS) maintains an offshore vessel's position and heading under various environmental conditions by using its own thrust. DPS is regarded as one of the most important systems in offshore vessels. So, efficient operation and maintenance of the DPS are important issues. To monitor the DPS, it is necessary to define an appropriate key performance indicator (KPI) that can express the condition of the DPS from the perspective of operational efficiency and maintenance. In this study, a new KPI for the DPS is proposed considering the efficiency of the machinery and controller, the energy efficiency, and the environmental conditions in which the DPS is operated. The KPI is defined as a function of control deviation, energy consumption, and environmental load. A normalization factor is used to normalize the effect of environmental load on the KPI. The KPI value is calculated from DPS simulation and model test data. The possibility of applying the KPI to monitoring of DPS condition is discussed by comparing the values. The result indicates the feasibility of the new KPI.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson, B.D.O., Moore, J.B., 1989. Optimal Control: Linear Quadratic Methods. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  2. Bengtsson, M., 2004. Condition Based Maintenance System - an Investigation of Technical Constituents and Organizational Aspects. Malardalen University Licentiate Thesis.
  3. Eriksen, C.M., 2010. Technical Condition Indexes for Ship Engine Auxiliary Systems. Norwegian University of Science and Technology. Master's Thesis.
  4. Fossen, T.I., Strand, J.P., 2001. Nonlinear passive weather optimal positioning control(WOPC) system for ships and rigs: experimental results. Automatica 37 (5), 701-715. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(01)00006-1
  5. Hvamb, O.G., 2001. A new concept for fuel tight DP control. In: Dynamic Positioning Conference, Houston, USA, 18-19 September 2001.
  6. ISO 13372, 2004. Condition Monitoring and Diagnostics of Machines - Vocabulary.
  7. Li, Z., Yan, X., Guo, Z., Zhang, Y., Yuan, C., 2012. Condition monitoring and fault diagnosis for marine diesel engines using information fusion techniques. Electron. Electr. Eng. 123 (7), 109-112.
  8. Oppenheim, A.V., Ronald, W., 1998. Discrete-time Signal Processing. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  9. Paik, B.G., Cho, S.R., Park, B.J., Lee, D.K., Bae, B.D., 2010. Development of real-time monitoring system using wired and wireless networks in a fullscale ship. Int. J. Nav. Archit. Ocean Eng. 2 (3), 132-138. https://doi.org/10.3744/JNAOE.2010.2.3.132
  10. Rao, B., 1996. Handbook of Condition Monitoring. Elsevier.

Cited by

  1. Application of novel all-direction thruster for dynamic positioning of sandglass-type FDPSO vol.15, pp.1, 2016, https://doi.org/10.1080/17445302.2019.1589039
  2. Improving the Performance of Dynamic Ship Positioning Systems: A Review of Filtering and Estimation Techniques vol.8, pp.4, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8040234