The Korean Journal of Pesticide Science (농약과학회지)

The Korean Society of Pesticide Science (한국농약과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Runoff of Azoxystrobin Applied in Pepper Field-lysimeter

고추 재배 포장 라이시메타를 이용한 Azoxystrobin의 유출 평가

  • Kim, Chan-Sub (Department of Agro-Food Safety and Crop Protection, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Hee-Dong (Department of Agro-Food Safety and Crop Protection, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Son, Kyeong-Ae (Department of Agro-Food Safety and Crop Protection, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Gil, Geun-Hwan (Department of Agro-Food Safety and Crop Protection, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ihm, Yang-Bin (Department of Agro-Food Safety and Crop Protection, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김찬섭 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농산물안전성부) ;
  • 이희동 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농산물안전성부) ;
  • 손경애 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농산물안전성부) ;
  • 길근환 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농산물안전성부) ;
  • 임양빈 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 농산물안전성부)
  • Received : 2016.09.02
  • Accepted : 2016.09.28
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

To investigate runoff losses of azoxystrobin from the field by rainfall, the influence of slope degree and length on runoff rate of azoxystrobin from the pepper field were measured. The SC type formulation was applied at the pepper field lysimeter in 2004 and 2005. The azoxystrobin washed down from plant were from 21% to 68% of what the applied. Concentrations of azoxystrobin in the first runoffs were less than $50{\mu}gL^{-1}$. Runoff losses were from 0.26% to 0.59% for 10% slope-plots, from 0.66% to 0.96% for 20% slope-plots, and from 0.84% to 1.78% for 30% slope-plots. Then they decreased with increasing slope-length. Runoff loss of azoxystrobin was closely related to volume of runoff, it was reduced by the ridge and the mulching effect.

작물재배 관행과 지형에 의한 농약의 유실양상의 차이를 파악하고자 고추재배 경사지 포장에서 농약유출 실험을 수행하였다. Azoxystrobin 20% 액상수화제를 2004년과 2005년에 살포한 후 작물체를 씻어 내리는 빗물과 유출수 중 azoxystrobin의 잔류 양상을 추적하였다. 농약살포 후 작물체 표면에 부착되었던 azoxystrobin이 빗물에 씻겨 내리는 정도는 살포량의 24~68% 수준이었다. Azoxystrobin의 첫 번째 유출농도는 $50{\mu}gL^{-1}$ 미만이었고, 10% 경사구의 유출률은 0.26~0.59%, 20% 경사구의 유출률은 0.66~0.96%, 30% 경사구의 유출률은 0.84~1.78%로 경사장의 증가에 따라 줄어들었다. Azoxystrobin의 유출률은 유출수량과 관계가 밀접하고, 단위면적당 유출수량은 두둑과 멀칭효과에 의해 감소하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. European Food Safety Authority (2010) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance azoxystrobin. pp 110.
  2. FOCUS (2004) FOCUS surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under 91/414/EEC. pp 294.
  3. Jarvis, N. J., J. M. Hollis, P. H. Nicholls, T. Mayer and S. P. Evans (1997) MACRO_DB : A decision-support tool for assessing pesticide fate and mobility in soils. Environmental Modelling & Software 12:251-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-8152(97)00147-3
  4. Kim, K., J. H. Kim and C. K. Park (1997) Pesticide runoff from soil surface by rainfall. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 16(3):274-284.
  5. Kim, S. S., Kim, T. H. Kim, S. M. Lee, D. S. Park, Y. Z. Zhu and J. H. Hur (2005) Mobility of pesticides in different slopes and soil collected from Gangwon alpine sloped-land under simulated rainfall conditions. Korean J. Pestic. Sci. 9(4):316-329.
  6. Kim, C. S., Y. B. Ihm, Y. D. Lee and B. Y. Oh (2006) Runoff and erosion of alachlor, ethalfluralin, ethoprophos and pendimethalin by rainfall simulation. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 25(4):306-315. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2006.25.4.306
  7. Kim, C. S., H. D. Lee, Y. B. Ihm and G. J. Im (2007) Runoff of endosulfan by rainfall simulation and from soybean-grown field lysimer. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 26(4):343-350. https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA.2007.26.4.343
  8. Korea Crop Protection Association. (2016a) Agrochemicals use guide book.
  9. Korea Crop Protection Association. (2016b) Agrochemicals year book.
  10. Leonard, R. A. (1990) Movement of pesticides into surface waters, In Pesticides in the soil environment: processes, impacts and modeling. H. H. Cheng, (Ed.), Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. 303-349.
  11. MacBean, C. (ed.) (2012) The pesticide manual (16th ed.). British Crop Protection Council.
  12. McCall, P. J., R. L. Swann, D. A. Laskowski, S. M. Unger, S. A. Vrona and H. J. Dishburger (1980) Estimation of chemical mobility in soil from liquid chromatographic retention times. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 24:190-195. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01608096
  13. Moon, Y. H., Kim, Y. T. Kim, Y. S. Kim and S. K. Han (1993) Simulation and measurement of degradation and movement of insecticide ethoprophos in soil. Korean J. Environ. Agric. 12(3):209-218.
  14. Roberts, T. R. (1996) Assessing the environmental fate of agrochemicals. J. Environ. Sci. Health. B31:325-335.
  15. Wischmeier, W. H. and D. D. Smith (1978) Predicting rainfall erosion losses - A guide to conservation planning. USDA Agriculture Handbook No. 537.

Cited by

  1. Runoff of Dimethomorph Applied in Pepper Field-lysimeter vol.21, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2017.21.3.289
  2. Runoff of Chlorothalonil Applied in Pepper Field-lysimeter vol.23, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7585/kjps.2019.23.4.388