DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analytical Method Validation and Monitoring of Pesticide Residues in Animal Feeds

유통 사료 중 잔류농약 다성분동시분석법 확립 및 모니터링

  • Kim, Jin Kuk (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Kim, Ho Jin (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Jeong, Myeong Sil (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Kim, Choong Ryeol (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Jeong, Min Hee (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Lee, Mi Jin (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Kang, Hye Min (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Lee, Jae Wheon (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS)) ;
  • Park, Hyejin (Experiment Research Institute, National Agricultural Products Quality Management Service (NAQS))
  • 김진국 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 김호진 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 정명실 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 김충렬 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 정민희 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 이미진 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 강혜민 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 이재훤 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소) ;
  • 박혜진 (국립농산물품질관리원 시험연구소)
  • Received : 2016.06.16
  • Accepted : 2016.09.28
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Safe animal feed is important for the health of animals, the environment and for the safety of foods of animal origin. Therefore, the aims of this study were: 1) to validate simultaneous analytical method and 2) to investigate the amount of pesticide residues in animal feed from Republic of Korea as a part of official control. A total of 126 samples were collected in 2015 and analyzed for 105 pesticides. According to pesticides monitoring result, no residue was found in 84.1% of the samples, whereas 15.9% of samples contained pesticide residues below the maximum residue limits (MRLs). Pirimiphos-methyl and cyproconazole were the two most frequently found pesticides. The results show that all commercial feed monitored in 2015 were safe under the Korean MRL and occurrence of pesticide residues in animal feed could not be considered serious threats to human and animal health. However, continuous monitoring with tighter regulation for pesticide residues in animal feed is recommended.

사료의 안전성은 우리가 먹는 축산식품 및 그 가공품의 안전성과 직결된다. 따라서 이 연구의 목적은 1) 사료 중 관리대상 농약의 동시분석법을 확립하고, 2) 국내외 사료 중 농약 잔류실태를 조사하여 원료부터의 축산식품의 안전성을 확보하고자 하였다. 농약 잔류실태 조사를 위해 국내 유통 사료 126점을 수거하였고, 농약잔류허용기준이 설정된 농약 121성분 중 동시분석이 가능한 105성분에 대해 분석법을 확립한 후 농약 잔류실태를 조사하였다. 농약 잔류실태 조사 결과에 따르면, 126점의 사료 중 106점(84.1%)이 불검출이었고, 20점(15.9%)에서 7성분이 농약잔류허용기준 이내로 검출되었다. 검출빈도가 높은 농약으로는 각각 5점에서 검출된 pirimiphos-methyl과 cyproconazole이었다. 이 밖에도 propiconazole, azoxystrobin, tricyclazole 등이 검출되었다. 이 결과들은 2015년 국내 유통 사료가 잔류허용기준 이하로 안전하게 관리되고 있음을 보여준다. 그럼에도 불구하고, 사료의 안전성 강화 및 불량사료 원천차단을 위해 지속적인 잔류 실태조사가 필요하다.

Keywords

References

  1. Codex Alimentarius Commission (CAC) (2003) Guidelines on good laboratory practice in residue analysis. CAC/GL 40-1993, Rev.1-2003, Rome, Italy.
  2. Codex (2016) Web search of maximum residue limits. http://www.fao.org/fao-whocodexalimentarius/standards/pestres/pesticides/en/. Accessed 26 May 2016.
  3. European Commission (EC) (2015) Guidance document on analytical quality control and validation procedures for pesticide residues analysis in food and feed. SANTE/11945/2015, Brussels, Belgium.
  4. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2010) Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cyproconazole. EFSA J. 8(11):1897-1969. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1897
  5. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (2015) Reasoned opinion on the review of the existing maximum residue levels (MRLs) for propiconazole according to Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005. EFSA J. 13(1):3975-4046. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2015.3975
  6. FAO/WHO (1992) Pesticide residues in food. Report of the Joint Meeting of the FAO Panel of Experts on pesticide residues in food and the environment and the WHO expert group on pesticide residues. Rome, Italy.
  7. Leeman, W. R., K. J. Van Den Berg and G. F. Houben (2007) Transfer of chemicals from feed to animal products: The use of transfer factors in risk assessment. Food Addit. Contam. 24(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030600815512
  8. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) (2015 A) Major Statistics of Agriculture. Food and Rural Affairs, pp. 358.
  9. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2015 B), Standard analytical methods of animal feeds, Annex 25.
  10. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2015 C) The range of hazardous substances and limits of animal feeds. Standards and Specifications of Animal Feeds, Annex 16.
  11. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (2016) Animal Feed Inspection Standards Article 10, MAFRA notification 2016-59.
  12. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (MFDS) (2013) Practical handbook of pesticide residue analytical methods of food code. 4th edition.
  13. Ministry of Food and Drug Safety (2016) Information of residue materials, https://www.foodnara.go.kr/residue/search/list.do?searchType=&searchValue=%ED%94%BC%EB%A6%AC%EB%AF%B8%ED%8F%AC%EC%8A%A4%EB%A9%94%ED%8B%B8&searchFlag=ALL. Accessed 26 May 2016.
  14. USA EPA (2016) Web search of maximum residue limits. http://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/ECFR?page=browseprevious&pitd=00000000&SID=f4a02a513f5f6ecf81e635eb1ed54f7a. Accessed 26 May 2016.
  15. USA FDA (2015) Pesticide Monitoring Program Fiscal Year 2012 Pesticide Report. www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaninants/Pesticides/default.htm. Accessed 26 May 2016.

Cited by

  1. Determination of 113 pesticides in hot pepper powder in Korea vol.46, pp.2, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.d20-063
  2. Simultaneous Analysis of Fenpropimorph and Fenpropimorph Acid in Six Different Livestock Products Using a Single-Sample Preparation Method Followed by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry vol.26, pp.19, 2016, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules26195791