DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Statistically estimated storage potential of organic carbon by its association with clay content for Korean upland subsoil

  • Han, Kyung-Hwa (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Zhang, Yong-Seon (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Jung, Kang-Ho (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Cho, Hee-Rae (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Seo, Mi-Jin (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA) ;
  • Sonn, Yeon-Kyu (Soil and Fertilizer Management Division, National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, RDA)
  • Received : 2016.07.06
  • Accepted : 2016.08.16
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) retention has gradually gotten attention due to the need for mitigation of increased atmospheric carbon dioxide and the simultaneous increase in crop productivity. We estimated the statistical maximum value of soil organic carbon (SOC) fixed by clay content using the Korean detailed soil map database. Clay content is a major factor determining SOC of subsoil because it influences the vertical mobility and adsorption capacity of dissolved organic matter. We selected 1,912 soil data of B and C horizons from 13 soil series, Sangju, Jigog, Jungdong, Bonryang, Anryong, Banho, Baegsan, Daegog, Yeongog, Bugog, Weongog, Gopyeong, and Bancheon, mainly distributed in Korean upland. The ranges of SOC and clay content were $0-40g\;kg^{-1}$ and 0 - 60%, respectively. Soils having more than 25% clay content had much lower SOC in subsoil than topsoil, probably due to low vertical mobility of dissolved organic carbon. The statistical analysis of SOC storage potential of upland subsoil, performed using 90%, 95%, and 99% maximum values in cumulative SOC frequency distribution in a range of clay content, revealed that these results could be applicable to soils with 1% - 25% of clay content. The 90% SOC maximum values, closest to the inflection point, at 5%, 10%, 15%, and 25% of clay contents were $7g\;kg^{-1}$, $10g\;kg^{-1}$, $12g\;kg^{-1}$, and $13g\;kg^{-1}$, respectively. We expect that the statistical analysis of SOC maximum values for different clay contents could contribute to quantifying the soil carbon sink capacity of Korean upland soils.

Keywords

References

  1. Baker JM, Oschsner TE, Venterea RT, Griffis TJ. 2007. Tillage and soil carbon sequestration - What do we really know? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118:1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.014
  2. Bolan NS, Adriano DC, de-la-Luz M. 2004. Dynamics and environmental significance of dissolved organic matter in soil in supersoil 2004: 3rd Australian New Zealand Soils Conference, 5-published on CDROM. Accessed in http://www.regional.org.au/au/asssi/.
  3. Carter MR. 1996. Analysis of soil organic matter storage in agroecosystem. In M.R. Carter and B.A. Stewart(ed.) Structure and organic matter storage in agricultural soils. pp. 3-11. Lewis Publ., CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL.
  4. Carter MR. 2002. Soil quality sustainable land management: organic matter and aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions. Agronomy Journal 94:38-47. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2002.0038
  5. Follett RF. 2001. Soil management concepts and carbon sequestration in cropland soils. Soil & Tillage Research 61:77-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(01)00180-5
  6. Han KH, Cho HJ, Lee HS, Oh DS, Kim LY. 2007. Stable macro-aggregate in wet sieving and soil properties. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 40: 255-261.
  7. Han KH, Cho HJ, Lee HS, Hur SO, Ha SK. 2009. Relationship between water stable aggregate and macroporosity in upland soils calculated by fragmentation fractal dimension. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 48:58-64
  8. Hassink J. 1997. The capacity of soils to preserve organic C and N by their association with clay and silt particles. Plant and Soil 191:77-87. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004213929699
  9. Ingram JSI, Fernandes ECM. 2001. Managing carbon sequestration in soils: concepts and terminology. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 87:111-117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(01)00145-1
  10. Institute of Agricultural Science. 1964-1979. Detailed soil map. Institute of Agricultural Science. Office of Rural Development, Suwon, Korea. [In Korean].
  11. IPCC. 2000. Land-use, land-use change, and forestry. In: Watson, R.T., I.R. Noble, B.R. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verado, and D.J. Dokken. (Eds.) Land-use, Land-use Change, and Forestry. A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). pp. 1-51. Cambridge University Press, UK.
  12. Jenkinson DS, Rayner JH. 1977. The turnover of soil organic matter in some of the Rothamsted classical experiments. Soil Science 123:298-305. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-197705000-00005
  13. Lal R. 2004. Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623-1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396
  14. Lassaletta L, Aguilera E. 2015. Soil carbon sequestration is a climate stabilization wedge: Comments on Sommer and Bossio (2014). Journal of Environmental Management 153:48-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.038
  15. Lorenz K, Lal R. 2005. The depth distribution of soil organic carbon in relation to land use and management and the potential of carbon sequestration in sub-soil horizons. Advanced Agronomy 88:36-66.
  16. Microsoft Excel. 2010. v. 14.0. Part of Microsoft Office Professional Plus 2010. Microsoft Corporation. US.
  17. NIAST. 1992. The general interpretation of Korean soils. National Institute of Agricultural Science and Technology, Rural Development Administration. Suwon, Korea. [In Korean]
  18. Pacala S, Socolow R. 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science 305:968-972. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100103
  19. Smith P. 2012. Agricultural greenhouse gas mitigation potential globally, in Europe and in the UK: what have we learnt in the last 20 years? Global Change Biology 18:35-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02517.x
  20. Rim SK, Hur BK, Jumg SJ, Hyeon GS. 1997. Physico-chemical properties on the management groups of upland soils in Korea. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer 30:67-71. [In Korean]
  21. Sommer R, Bossio D. 2014. Dynamics and climate change mitigation potential of soil organic carbon sequestration. Journal of Environmental Management 144:83-87 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.05.017
  22. Torn MS, Trumbore SE, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Hendricks DM. 1997. Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389:170-173. https://doi.org/10.1038/38260
  23. Zhao L, Sun Y, Zhang X, Yang X, Drury CF. 2006. Soil organic carbon in clay and silt sized particles in Chinese mollisols: Relationship to the predicted capacity. Geoderma 132:315-323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.026

Cited by

  1. Effect of biochar application on growth of Chinese cabbage (Brassica chinensis) vol.44, pp.3, 2016, https://doi.org/10.7744/kjoas.20170039