DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of door handling task in people with mild and moderate stroke

  • Lee, Jung Ah (Department of Clinical Research on Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center) ;
  • Kim, Eun Joo (Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center) ;
  • Hwang, Pil Woo (Balance Brain Goyang Center) ;
  • Park, Han Ram (Department of Clinical Research on Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center) ;
  • Bae, Jae Hyuk (Department of Clinical Research on Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center) ;
  • Kim, Jae Nam (Department of Clinical Research on Rehabilitation, National Rehabilitation Center)
  • Received : 2016.08.09
  • Accepted : 2016.09.05
  • Published : 2016.09.30

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to quantify one of the useful upper extremity movements to evaluate motor control abilities between the groups of people with mild and moderate arm impairments performing a door handling task. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Twenty-one healthy participants and twenty-one persons with chronic stroke (9 mild stroke and 12 moderate stroke) were recruited for this study. Stroke participants were divided into 2 groups based on Fugle-Meyer Assessment scores of 58-65 (mild arm) and 38-57 (moderate arm). All they performed door handling task including the pronation and supination phases 3 times. We measured some movement factors which were reaction time, movement time, hand of peak velocity, hand of movement units to perform door handling task using the three-dimensional motion analysis. Results: The majority of kinematic variables showed significant differences among study groups (p<0.05). The reaction time, total and phase of movement time, hand of peak velocity, the number of movement units discriminated between healthy participants and persons with moderate upper limb stroke (p<0.05). In addition, reaction time, total and phase of movement time, the number of movement units discriminated between those with moderate and mild upper limbs of stroke patients (p<0.05). Conclusions: Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis in this study was a useful tool for assessing the upper extremity function in different subgroups of people with stroke during the door handling task. These kinematic variables may help clinicians understand the arm movements in door handling task and consist of discriminative therapeutic interventions for stroke patients on upper extremity rehabilitation.

Keywords

References

  1. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, Landsman PB, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1181-8. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.25.6.1181
  2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72:473-9.
  3. Broeks JG, Lankhorst GJ, Rumping K, Prevo AJ. The long-term outcome of arm function after stroke: results of a follow-up study. Disabil Rehabil 1999;21:357-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/096382899297459
  4. Alt Murphy M, Sunnerhagen KS, Johnels B, Willen C. Three-dimensional kinematic motion analysis of a daily activity drinking from a glass: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006;3:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-3-18
  5. Riccio I, Iolascon G, Barillari MR, Gimigliano R, Gimigliano F. Mental practice is effective in upper limb recovery after stroke: a randomized single-blind cross-over study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2010;46:19-25.
  6. Caliandro P, Celletti C, Padua L, Minciotti I, Russo G, Granata G, et al. Focal muscle vibration in the treatment of upper limb spasticity: a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2012;93:1656-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.002
  7. Tavernese E, Paoloni M, Mangone M, Mandic V, Sale P, Franceschini M, et al. Segmental muscle vibration improves reaching movement in patients with chronic stroke. A randomized controlled trial. NeuroRehabilitation 2013;32:591-9.
  8. Finch E, Brooks D, Stratford PW, Mayo NE. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enhanced clinical decision making. 2nd ed. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker; 2002.
  9. McCrea PH, Eng JJ, Hodgson AJ. Biomechanics of reaching: clinical implications for individuals with acquired brain injury. Disabil Rehabil 2002;24:534-41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280110115393
  10. Wade DT. Measurement in neurological rehabilitation. Curr Opin Neurol Neurosurg 1992;5:682-6.
  11. de los Reyes-Guzman A, Dimbwadyo-Terrer I, Trincado-Alonso F, Monasterio-Huelin F, Torricelli D, Gil-Agudo A. Quantitative assessment based on kinematic measures of functional impairments during upper extremity movements: a review. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014;29:719-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2014.06.013
  12. Cacho EW, de Oliveira R, Ortolan RL, Varoto R, Cliquet A Jr. Upper limb assessment in tetraplegia: clinical, functional and kinematic correlations. Int J Rehabil Res 2011;34:65-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/MRR.0b013e32833d6cf3
  13. Kamper DG, McKenna-Cole AN, Kahn LE, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Alterations in reaching after stroke and their relation to movement direction and impairment severity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002;83:702-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/apmr.2002.32446
  14. Trombly CA. Deficits of reaching in subjects with left hemiparesis: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 1992;46:887-97. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.46.10.887
  15. Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Gangitano M, Grimaldi S. Grasp with hand and mouth: a kinematic study on healthy subjects. J Neurophysiol 2001;86:1685-99. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1685
  16. Paulignan Y, MacKenzie C, Marteniuk R, Jeannerod M. The coupling of arm and finger movements during prehension. Exp Brain Res 1990;79:431-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00608255
  17. Maitra KK, Junkins MD. Upper extremity movement pattern of a common drinking task in well elderly women: a pilot study. Occup Ther Int 2004;11:67-81. https://doi.org/10.1002/oti.198
  18. Murgia A, Kyberd PJ, Chappell PH, Light CM. Marker placement to describe the wrist movements during activities of daily living in cyclical tasks. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2004;19:248-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.012
  19. Weiss PH, Jeannerod M, Paulignan Y, Freund HJ. Is the organisation of goal-directed action modality specific? A common temporal structure. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1136-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00029-4
  20. Cirstea MC, Mitnitski AB, Feldman AG, Levin MF. Interjoint coordination dynamics during reaching in stroke. Exp Brain Res 2003;151:289-300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-003-1438-0
  21. Levin MF. Interjoint coordination during pointing movements is disrupted in spastic hemiparesis. Brain 1996;119:281-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/119.1.281
  22. Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS. Kinematic variables quantifying upper-extremity performance after stroke during reaching and drinking from a glass. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310370748
  23. Shumway-Cook A, Woollacott MH. Motor control: theory and practical applications. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1995.
  24. Trombly CA, Wu CY. Effect of rehabilitation tasks on organization of movement after stroke. Am J Occup Ther 1999;53:333-44. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.53.4.333
  25. Aprile I, Rabuffetti M, Padua L, Di Sipio E, Simbolotti C, Ferrarin M. Kinematic analysis of the upper limb motor strategies in stroke patients as a tool towards advanced neurorehabilitation strategies: a preliminary study. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:636123.
  26. Kim K, Song WK, Lee J, Lee HY, Park DS, Ko BW, et al. Kinematic analysis of upper extremity movement during drinking in hemiplegic subjects. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2014;29:248-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2013.12.013
  27. Alt Murphy M, Willen C, Sunnerhagen KS. Movement kinematics during a drinking task are associated with the activity capacity level after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26:1106-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968312448234
  28. Wu CY, Wong MK, Lin KC, Chen HC. Effects of task goal and personal preference on seated reaching kinematics after stroke. Stroke 2001;32:70-6. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.STR.32.1.70
  29. Lough S, Wing AM, Fraser C, Jenner JR. Measurement of recovery of function in the hemiparetic upper limb following stroke: a preliminary report. Human Mov Sci 1984:3:247-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(84)90019-8
  30. Trombly CA. Observations of improvement of reaching in five subjects with left hemiparesis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:40-5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.56.1.40
  31. Chae J, Yang G, Park BK, Labatia I. Delay in initiation and termination of muscle contraction, motor impairment, and physical disability in upper limb hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve 2002;25:568-75. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.10061
  32. De Weerdt WJG, Harrison MA. Measuring recovery of arm-hand function in stroke patients: a comparison of the Brunnstrom-Fugl-Meyer test and the action research arm test. Physiother Canada 1985:37:65-70. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.37.2.065
  33. Lambercy O, Dovat L, Yun H, Wee SK, Kuah CW, Chua KS, et al. Effects of a robot-assisted training of grasp and pronation/ supination in chronic stroke: a pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:63.

Cited by

  1. Human Hand Motion Analysis during Different Eating Activities vol.2018, pp.1754-2103, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8567648
  2. 3D 모션입력장치를 이용한 거울치료가 뇌졸중 환자의 상지 운동 기능, 삶의 질, 우울감에 미치는 영향 vol.4, pp.4, 2016, https://doi.org/10.15268/ksim.2016.4.4.041