Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회지)

Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture (한국전통조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Coexistance of Ganghak(講學) and Yusik(遊息) space of Oksan Confucian Academy, Gyeongju: Directed Attention Restoration Theory Perspectives

주의집중 피로회복이론의 장으로 본 경주 옥산서원 강학 및 유식공간의 일원적 공간성

  • Tak, Young-Ran (College of Nursing, Hanyang University/Interdisciplinary Program in Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sung, Jeong-Sang (Graduate School of Environmental Studies, Seoul National University) ;
  • Choi, Jong-Hee (Division of Horticulture & Landscape Architecture, PaiChai University) ;
  • Kim, Soon-Ae (Seoul Women's College of Nursing) ;
  • Rho, Jae-Hyun (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Woosuk University)
  • 탁영란 (한양대학교 간호학부/서울대학교 대학원 협동과정 조경학) ;
  • 성종상 (서울대학교 환경대학원) ;
  • 최종희 (배재대학교 원예조경학부) ;
  • 김순애 (서울여자간호대학) ;
  • 노재현 (우석대학교 조경학과)
  • Received : 2016.05.16
  • Accepted : 2016.09.20
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study attempts to understand and explain how "Directed Attention Restorative Environment (DARE)" is managed and fostered in "Gang-Hak (講學)" and "Yu-Sik (遊息)" spaces both inside and outside of Oksan Seowon Confucian Academy, Gyeongju. Directed Attention is a pivotal element in human information processing so that its restoration is crucial for effective thinking and learning. According to Kaplan & Kaplan's Attention Restoration Theory, an environment, in order to be restorative, should have four elements: 'Being Away,' 'Extent,' 'Fascination,' and 'Compatibility.' We could confirm OkSan Seowon Confucian Academy has an inner logic that integrates two basically different spacial concepts of "Jangsu" and "Yusik" and thus fosters the Attention Restorative Environment. Particularly, the Four Mountains and Five Platforms (四山五臺) surrounding the premises provides an excellent learning environment, and is in itself educational in terms of the Neo-Confucian epistemology with "Attaining Knowledge by way of Positioning Things (格物致知)" as its principle precept, and of its aesthetics with "Connectedness with Nature" as its central tenet. This study attempts to recapture the value of Korea's cultural heritage concerning the Human/Nature relationship; and it may provide useful insights and practical guidelines/grounds in designing today's schools and campuses, where the young people's needs for the Directed Attention- and Attention Restorative- Servicescapes seem to be greater than ever.

조선 중기 대표적 서원중의 하나인 옥산서원을 사례대상으로, Kaplan의 "주의집중회복이론 틀"을 적용시켜, 서원의 기호학적 의미체계로서의 강학과 유식공간 상호 간의 보완적 특성을 파악함으로써 전통조경의 함축적 의미 도출과 경관해석의 지평을 넓히고, 현대적 학교 공간계획과 조경설계에 일조할 수 있는 논거를 구축하고자 한 본 연구의 결론은 다음과 같다. 옥산서원의 강학과 유식공간의 공간과 경관의 일원성을 통해 주의집중과 회복, 자연과의 합일 그리고 심성론과 수양론을 관통하는 성리미학적 속성이 확인되었다. 이는 정보처리과정을 위한 주의집중을 효과적으로 재개하는 회복적 공간특질로 설명할 수 있다. 옥산서원과 그 주변 환경은 입지와 공간구성, 공간포치 그리고 당호 등을 통한 기호체계의 일부로서, 강학과 유식공간의 일원성을 설명하는 유기체적 환경이며 이는 주의집중으로 부터의 네 가지 회복적 환경요소과 결부되어 나타난다. 즉 자연완상은 강학의 연장인 유식을 통해 강학의 궁구함을 가져오는 체험을 넓히게 한다. 요컨대 '공부'와 '쉼'의 과정은 완물적정을 통해 존재의 의미를 발견하고 인간의 심성을 수양하며 도덕을 체득하게 유도되고 있다. 옥산서원은 입지적으로 읍치로 부터 일정 거리를 두고 떨어진 '벗어남'과 서원의 조망경관과 공간 포치를 이용한 영역 간의 일체감을 통한 '확장감'이 부상되며, 폐쇄성 강한 서원내부에서 자연 우월적 외부공간으로 이르는 다양한 출구 또한 자연으로의 확장을 돕고 있다. 뿐만 아니라 옥산서원에서는 강학과 유식의 호환 및 양립성을 통해 본 '부합성' 등에 기반한 서비스스케이프가 잘 드러난다. 회복관경의 극점은 학문적 존양자인 회재의 자연 유상공간인 사산오대 및 옥산구곡과 관련된 경물 체험을 통해 환기되는 '매혹감'에서 더욱 여실히 나타난다. 이는 강학과 유식이라는 서로 다른 기능공간을 일원적으로 통합하는 내적 질서이자 중요한 회복환경의 가치임을 일깨운다. 특히 옥산서원 주변에 펼쳐져, 회재로부터 정의되고 의미를 부여 받은 사산오대는 성리학적 인식론의 관점에서 자연의 숭고미와 격물치지를 이해하는 매우 유효한 학습환경일 뿐 아니라 주의집중능력을 강화시킬 수 있는 서비스스케이프로써, 최적화한 회복환경이 되고 있음을 실증적으로 보여주었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee, S. H.(1998). Seowon, Seoul, Yeolhwadang.
  2. Jung, G. C.(2000). Meaning of Nam-kye Auditorium in History of Architecture. The Korean Society of Oriental Art Studies. 1: 393-425.
  3. Kim, D. H. and Lee, S. H.(2013). An Interpretation on Location and Inner Part organization of Korean Seowons: Focused on Four Soewons Designated by Korea as National Historic Site. Journal of Cultural and Historical Geography, 25(2): 15-36.
  4. Mitchell, D., Breiback, C., Agnew, J. A., and Duncan, J. S. (eds)(2011). Human Geography, John Wiley & Sons. pp.209-211.
  5. Kaplan, S. and Kaplan, R.(1981). Cognition and Environment: Functioning in an Uncertain World. Michigan, Ulrich's.
  6. Kim S. H. and Choi K. R.(2009). A Study on "YuSik" Space of Jung-ja Architecture in Choson Dynasty. Journal of the Architectural institute of Korea: Planning & design. 25(9): 197-204.
  7. Wu, X.(2005). Yuelu Academy: Landscape and Gardens of Neo-Confucian Pedagogy. Studies in the History of Gardens and Designed Landscapes. pp.156-190.
  8. Kaplan, S.(1995). The Restorative Benefits of Nature: Toward an Integrative Framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 15: 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
  9. Kaplan, R., Kaplan, S., and Ryan, R.(1998). With People in Mind: Design and Management of Everyday Nature, Washington DC: Island Press.
  10. Kaplan, S.(2001). Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue. Environment and Behavior. 33: 480-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106
  11. Berto, R.(2005). Exposure to Restorative Environments Helps Restore Attentional Capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 25: 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
  12. Kaplan, R.(2001). The Nature of the View from Home: Psychological benefits. Envrionment and Behavior. 33(4): 507-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115
  13. Wilke, S. and Stavridou, A.(2013). Influence of Environmental Preference and Environment Type Congruence on judgements of Restoration Potential. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 12(2): 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2013.01.004
  14. Ward Thompson, C. and Aspinal, P.(2011). Natural Environments and Their Impacts on Activity, Health, and Quality of Life, Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being. 3(3): 230-260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-0854.2011.01053.x
  15. Velarde, M. and Tveit, M.(2007). Health Effects of Viewing Landscapes-landscape Types in Environmental Psychology, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening. 6(4): 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
  16. Nightingale, F.(1996)(1860). Notes of Nursing: What it is and what it is not (Revised with additions). London: Balliere Tindall.
  17. White, S., Humphryes, P., and Depledge, S.(2010). Blue space: The importance of water for preference, affect, and restorativeness ratings of natural and built scences. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 30: 482-493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.004
  18. Sato, I. and Conner, T.(2013). The quality of time in nature: How fascination Explain and Enhances the Relationship between Natural Experiences and Daily Affect. Ecopsychology. 5(3): 197-204. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2013.0026
  19. Kaplan, R.(2001). The Nature of the view from Home: Psychological benefits, Environment and Behavior. 33(4): 507-542. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973115
  20. Keniger, L. E., Gaston, K. J., Irvine, K. N., and Fuller, R. A.(2013), What are the benefits of interacting with nature?. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 10(3): 913-935. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10030913
  21. Volker, K.(2011). The Impact of Blue Space on Human Health and Well-being-Salutogenetic Health Effects of Inland Surface Waters: A review. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health. pp.449-460.
  22. Kim, E. J, and Joo, N. C.(1991). A Study on Site plan type and it's Transition of Seowon Architecture. Journal of the Architectural institute of Korea. 7(6): 123-131.
  23. Song, Y. I.(2001). A Study on the Building Layout of Oksan-Seowon Chosun dynasty, Confucianism adopted as a new ruling ideology had strongly influenced on, Kumho National University of Technology. Unpublished Thesis.
  24. http://kyujanggak.snu.ac.kr
  25. Lee, S. H.(2014). An Interpretative Study on Location and Landscape of Korean Seowons-Focused on Seowons with Pavilion. Kyeongsang University. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis.
  26. Chung, Y. Y., Sung, J. S, and Pae, J. H.(2011). A Study on Managing the Landscape in Dok-Rak-Dang Garden. Journal of Korean institute of Landscape Architecture. 39(1): 96-105. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.1.096
  27. Yeoju Lee SsiSebo(驪州李氏世譜). Vol.1.
  28. National Geographic Information Institute(2011). The Oigin of Korean Geographic Names: Gyeungsangdo.
  29. Choi, M. K.(2010). Architectural planning of SeoWon Lu in YoungNam province. Dissertation Sungkyunkwan University.
  30. http://blog.naver.com/lacomi1/220641931151
  31. Yang, S. Y.(1980). A study on the landscape of Seowon-Seoak and Oksan Seowon. Jinju Argricultural College Research. 18: 101-111.
  32. http://www.seowonheritage.org
  33. Yoo, I. H. and Ha, H. J.(2012). A Study on the Building Layout of Oksan-Seowon, Residential Environment. 10(2): 145-157.
  34. http://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1727032&cid=49277&categoryId=49277
  35. Rho, J. H., Huh, J., and Choi, J. H.(2014). Landscape configuration Reading of 'Jangseong Pilmaseowon' through the Recomposition of Landscape. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 32(2): 42-54. https://doi.org/10.14700/KITLA.2014.32.2.042
  36. Rho, J. H. and Shin, B. C.(2012). The Landscape Organization of the Dodong-Seowon in the Aesthetics of Moderation. Journal of the Korean Institute of Traditional Landscape Architecture. 30(4): 44-55.