Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Structure and Content of Abstracts: Focused on Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management

초록의 구조와 내용에 관한 연구: 정보관리학회지를 중심으로

  • Received : 2016.05.20
  • Accepted : 2016.07.31
  • Published : 2016.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aims to identify the characteristics of abstracts by analyzing the status of abstracts published in 'Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management.' To this end, the study analyzed the components of and the types of abstracts. Target abstracts were those published in the journal from 1984 to 2015. The journal published 1,168 articles with indicative abstracts accounting for 96.6%, informative abstracts 3.4%, and abstracts written in both English and Korean 99.5%. As for research methods, case study through literature review was 52.8%, surveys 21.1%, and experimentation 26.1%. The percentage of abstracts consisting of one paragraph was 92.1%, more than two paragraphs were 7.9%, fewer than 5 sentences were 79%, and 6 sentences or more were 21%. The use of the first person was 90.5%. In terms of topic areas, library and information center management was 19.4%, information services 17.3%, information technology 16.2%, information retrieval 15.1%, and informetrics 9.6%, etc.

이 연구는 정보관리학회지의 초록의 현황에 대한 조사와 분석을 통해 초록의 특징을 진단하고자 한다. 이를 위해 학회지의 저자초록을 중심으로 초록의 구성요소, 초록의 유형 등을 분석하였다. 대상초록은 1984년부터 2015년까지 간행된 학회지 논문이다. 그 결과 수록논문은 1,168편, 지시적 초록은 96.6%, 통보적 초록은 3.4%, 국어와 영어 병기 초록은 99.5%였다. 연구방법에서 문헌사례 52.8%, 설문조사 21.1%, 실험이 26.1%였다. 문단과 문장에서 1문단이 92.1%, 2문단 이상이 7.9%, 5문장 이하가 79%, 6문장 이상이 21%, 1인칭 사용이 90.5%로 나타났다. 주제영역은 도서관/정보센터경영 19.4%, 정보서비스 17.3%, 정보공학 16.4%, 정보검색 15.1%, 계량정보 9.6% 등의 순으로 나타났다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 전남대학교

References

  1. 국회예산정책처 (2014). 2015년도 예산안 분야별 분석 I. 서울: 국회예산정책처. (National Assembly Budget Office (2014). 2015 the Budget for Sector Analysis I. Seoul: National Assembly Budget Office.)
  2. 김재수, 남영준 (1992). 표제와 초록의 색인성과 정보량 분석. 정보관리연구, 23(2), 1-13. (Kim, Jae-Soo, & Nam, Young-Joon (1992). Index ability and information quantity analysis in title and abstract. Journal of Information Management, 23(2), 1-13.)
  3. 김홍렬 (2015). 국내 문헌정보학분야 학술지의 상호인용관계 분석. 정보관리학회지, 32(4), 7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.4.007 (Kim, Hong-Ryul (2015). Citation analysis of scholarly journals of library & information science field in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 32(4), 7-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2015.32.4.007)
  4. 김현희 (2008). 영상 초록 구현을 위한 키프레임 추출 알고리즘의 설계와 성능 평가. 정보관리학회지, 25(4), 131-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2008.25.4.131 (Kim, Hyun-Hee (2008). Design and evaluation of the key-frame extraction algorithm for constructing the virtual storyboard surrogates. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 25(4), 131-148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2008.25.4.131)
  5. 노진영 (2003). 색인초록작성법. 공주: 공주대학교 출판부. (Ro, Jin-Young (2003). Derivative indexing Information. Kongju: Kongju National University Press.)
  6. 문헌정보학용어사전 편찬위원회 (2010). 문헌정보학 용어사전 (개정판). 서울: 한국도서관협회. (The Glossary of Library and Information Science Compilation Committee (2010). The glossary of library and information science (Rev. ed.). Seoul: The Korean Library Association.)
  7. 産業技術情報院 (1992). 抄錄 및 索引論. 서울: 産業技術情報院. (Korea Institute of Industry & Technology Information (1992). Abstracting and indexing. Korea Institute of Industry & Technology Information. Seoul: Korea Institute of Industry & Technology Information.)
  8. 윤구호 (2001). 색인.초록 (개정증보판). 서울: 한국도서관협회. (Yoon, Koo-Ho (2001). Indexing and abstracting (Rev. ed.). Seoul: The Korean Library Association.)
  9. 이수상 (2011). 정보검색의 세계. 서울: 한국도서관협회. (Lee, Soo-Sang (2011). Information retrieval. Seoul: The Korean Library Association.)
  10. 이준호, 안정수, 박현주, 김명호 (1996). 한글 문서의 효과적인 검색을 위한 n-Gram 기반의 색인방법. 정보관리학회지, 13(1), 47-63. (Lee, Joon-Ho, Ahn, Jeong-Soo, Park, Hyun-Joo, & Kim, Myoung-Ho (1996). An n-gram-based indexing method for effective retrieval of Hangul texts. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 13(1), 47-63.)
  11. 이태영 (1990). 한국어 초록문의 문장과 내용에 대한 연구. 정보관리연구, 21(1), 1-33. (Lee, Tae-Young (1990). A study on the contents and sentences of Korean abstract. Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 1-33.)
  12. 이태영 (1992). 한국어 초록작성의 자동화에 관한 연구: 미생물학분야 학술지의 논문을 대상으로. 박사학위논문, 연세대학교 대학원, 문헌정보학과. (Lee, Tae-Young (1992). A study on an automatic abstracting system for journal articles in Korean in the field of microbiology. Ph.D. dissertation, Graduate School of Yonsei University, Department of Library and Information Science.)
  13. 日本科學技術情報流通技術基準委員會 (1987). 科學技術情報流通技術基準 SIST 01-1980 抄 錄作 成. 東京: 日本科學技術情報 Center.
  14. 장우권 (2015). 초록의 구조와 속성에 관한 연구. 제22회 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 83-86. (Chang, Woo-Kwon (2015). A study on the structure and quality of abstracts. Proceedings of the 22th Conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 83-86.)
  15. 장혜란 (1996). 한글초록의 현황과 내용분석- 사회과학분야 저자초록을 중심으로. 한국문헌정보학회지, 30(1), 35-48. (Chang, Hye-Rhan (1996). An analysis of current states and information content of author abstracts in the field of social sciences. Journal of the Korean Library and Information Science Society, 30(1), 35-48.)
  16. 최상희, 이재윤 (2012). 문서 클러스터링을 위한 학술지 논문의 구조적 초록 활용성 연구. 정보관리학회지, 29(1), 331-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2012.29.1.331 (Choi, Sang-Hee, & Lee, Jae-Yun (2012). Usability analysis of structured abstracts in journal articles for document clustering. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Management, 29(1), 331-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2012.29.1.331)
  17. American National Standards Institute (1979). ANSI Z39.14 Writing abstracts. New York: ANSI.
  18. Borko, H., & Bernier, C. L. (1975). Abstracting concepts and methods. New York: Academic Press.
  19. Borko, H., & Chatman, S. (1963). Criteria for acceptable abstracts: A survey of abstracter's instructions. American Documentation, 14(2), 149-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140211
  20. Critical Abstract (1929). British Journal of Medical Psychology, 9(3), 263-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1929.tb01406.x
  21. Chu, Heting (2010). Information representation and retrieval in the digital age. (2nd ed.). 장혜란 역. (2011). 디지털시대의 정보 표현과 검색. 서울: 한국도서관협회.
  22. Cleveland, D. B., & Cleveland, A. D. (1983). Introduction to indexing and abstracting. 김두홍, 서혜란 공역. (1990). 색인 및 초록작성법. 서울: 구미무역.
  23. Dronberger, G. B., & Kowitz, G. T. (1975). Abstract readability as a factor of information system. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 26(2), 108-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260206
  24. Fidel, R. (1986a). The possible effect of abstracting guidelines on retrieval performance of freetext searching. Information Processing & Management, 22(4), 309-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0306-4573(86)90029-4
  25. Fidel, R. (1986b). Writing abstracts for free-text searching. Journal of Documentation, 42(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026785
  26. Hahs-Vaughn, D. L., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2010). Quality of abstracts in articles submitted to a scholarly journal: A mixed methods case study of the journal research in the schools. Library & Information Science Research, 32(1), 53-61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2009.08.004
  27. Hartley, J. (1997). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in social science journals? Learned Publishing, 10(4), 313-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.1087/09531519750146789
  28. Hartley, J. (1998). Is it appropriate to use structured abstracts in non-medical science journals? Journal of Information Science, 24(5), 359-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016555159802400508
  29. Hartley, J. (2000). Clarifying the abstracts of systematic reviews. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(4), 332-337.
  30. Hartley, J. (2003). Improving the clarity of journal of abstracts in psychology: The case for structure. Science Communication, 24(3), 366-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1075547002250301
  31. ISO (1976). ISO 214: Abstracts for publications and documentation. Geneva: ISO.
  32. King, R. A. (1976). A comparison of the readability of abstracts with their source documentations. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 27(2), 118-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630270207
  33. Lancaster, F. W. (1991). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice. London: The Library Association.
  34. Lancaster, F. W. (1998). Indexing and abstracting in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Champaign, Ill: University of Illinois.
  35. Nakayma, T., Hirai, N., Yamajaki, S., & Naito, M. (2005). Adoption of structured abstracts by general medical journals and format for a structured abstract. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 93(2), 237-242.
  36. Rowley, J. E. (1982). Abstracting and indexing. London: Clive Bingley.
  37. Rowley, J. E. (1988). Abstracting and indexing (2nd ed.). London: Clive Bingley.
  38. Sharma, S., & Harrison, J. E. (2006). Structured abstracts: Do they improve the quality of information in abstracts? American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 130(4), 523-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.023
  39. Slutkin, N. A. et al. (1987). Analysis of information content of patent abstracts. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 14(6), 84-88.
  40. Stevenson, H. A., & Harrison, J. E. (2009). Structured abstracts: Do they improve citation retrieval from dental journals? Journal of Orthodontics, 36(1), 52-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1179/14653120722932
  41. Tenopir, C., & Jacso, P. (1993). Quality of abstracts. Online, 17(3), 44-55.
  42. Tibbo, H. R. (1992). Abstracting across the disciplines. Library and Information Science Research, 14, 31-56.
  43. Wagers, R. (1983). Effective searching in database abstracts. Online, 7(5), 60-77.
  44. Weil, B. H. (1970). Standards for writing abstracts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21(5), 351-357. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630210507